similar to: Glustershd error - Cannot assign requested address to port 24007

On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 03:37 -0700, shorewall-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: > Re: How to block forwarding by port 25? (John Morris) Thanks, that helped to find out the infected pc in private network, also to stop sending spam without our knowledge. is there a good tutorial how to block p2p sharing and messengers with shorewall? i read some topics and posts in forums, but

Hello! We have Samba 2.2.2 and we're using security=share. Our clients are windows users (95,98,2000,XP). To permit the logon into the shares we ran the registry modification to enable plain passwords and all works fine until now. My question is if in the new versions (samba 3.0) we still need that change into the registry. That's because our informatic security department doesn't like

Hi Gluster users ! In the process of upgrading a Gluster 3.0.0 platform to 3.3.0, I'm trying to understand how GlusterFS 3.3.0 is working. I can't find any documentation which explains what's the role of glustershd. The only thing I (think I) understand is that the glustershd-server.vol is only generated for replicated volumes. It contains a cluster/replicate volume which replicate

Whenever we do some fop on EC volume on a file, we check the xattr also to see if the file is healthy or not. If not, we trigger heal. lookup is the fop for which we don't take inodelk lock so it is possible that the xattr which we get for lookup fop are different for some bricks. This difference is not reliable but still we are triggering heal and that is why you are seeing these messages.

Ashish, which version has this issue fixed? On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am using 3.10.1 from which version this update is available. > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> Whenever we do some fop on EC volume on a file, we check the xattr also

Based on this BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414287 it has been fixed in glusterfs-3.11.0 --- Ashish ----- Original Message ----- From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83 at gmail.com> To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com> Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:07:16 PM Subject:

Hi , I need some clarification for below error msg in the glustershd.log file. What is this msg? Why is this showing up?. currently using glusterfs 3.10.1 when ever I start write process to volume (volume mounted thru fuse) I am seeing this kind of error and glustershd process consumes some percentage of cpu until write process completes. [2017-08-28 10:01:13.030710] W [MSGID: 122006]

I am using 3.10.1 from which version this update is available. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote: > > Whenever we do some fop on EC volume on a file, we check the xattr also to > see if the file is healthy or not. If not, we trigger heal. > lookup is the fop for which we don't take inodelk lock so it is possible > that the

I have a virtual machine that had been running fine using a RAW disk image (IDE). I am in the process of converting this virtual machine to use a single LVM and virtio. (For LVM backup snapshots and easy resizing purposes (no LVM within the guest)) I create the LVM and copied all the files from the existing RAW image to an ext3 under the LVM. However, I cannot get it to boot. It has to do

Buenas a todos, Tengo que adaptar un proyecto que esta en lenguaje de SQL Server a RStudio. En el transcurso de este procedimiento tengo que realizar algunas consultas bastante complejas seleccionando campos de varias tablas y utilizar algunas clausulas como EXCEPT o UNION ALL. También debo actualizar varios campos de tablas usando la sentencia UPDATE y eliminar tablas bien con usando DROP TABLE o

Greetings, i came accross some comments about hardware ssl accelerator use under *nix in this list , and applied some of this information (which are post approximately 2 months ago) successfully to make apache to use hardware ssl accelerator . To do so i just wrote "SSLCryptoDevice ubsec" option to my httpd.conf and httpd started to use my Broadcom accelerator . But i still have