similar to: through a vpn tunnel?

Could you please send me "info" file which is placed in "/var/lib/glusterd/vols/<vol-name>" directory from all the nodes along with glusterd.logs and command-history. Thanks Gaurav On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:13 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi fellas, > same old same > in log of the probing peer I see: > ... > 2017-08-29

Yes it could as depending on number of bricks there might be too many brick ops involved. This is the reason we introduced --timeout option in CLI which can be used to have a larger time out value. However this fix is available from release-3.9 onwards. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi fellas > > would you know what could be the

Logs from newly added node helped me in RCA of the issue. Info file on node 10.5.6.17 consist of an additional property "tier-enabled" which is not present in info file from other 3 nodes, hence when gluster peer probe call is made, in order to maintain consistency across the cluster cksum is compared. In this case as both files are different leading to different cksum, causing state in

hi fellas, same old same in log of the probing peer I see: ... 2017-08-29 13:36:16.882196] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3020:__glusterd_handle_probe_query] 0-glusterd: Responded to priv.xx.xx.priv.xx.xx.x, op_ret: 0, op_errno: 0, ret: 0 [2017-08-29 13:36:16.904961] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2606:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid:

hi fellas would you know what could be the problem with: vol status detail times out always? After I did above I had to restart glusterd on the peer which had the command issued. I run 3.8.14. Everything seems to work a ok. many thanks L.

Hi all Hi everyone Shorewall 3.2.6 and OpenSWAN 2.4.4-18.2 are on SLES10 machine with public fixed IP address on Internet interface. I am trying to establish IPSEC VPN tunnel to network behind D-Link DI-804HV VPN router who is on dynamic IP address. For this I am using dyndns.org alias on DI804 side. Shorewall is stopping all packets comming from DI804 whey trying to establish tunnel. Log on

... or in other words - can samba break (on Centos 7.3) if one goes with gluster version to high? hi fellas. I wonder because I see: smbd[4088153]: Unknown gluster ACL version: -847736808 smbd[4088153]: [2017/07/27 13:12:54.047332, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c:1365(gluster_to_smb_acl) smbd[4088153]: Unknown gluster ACL version: 0 smbd[4088153]: [2017/07/27 13:12:54.162658, 0]

Hi Guus, I?m using tinc since 1.0pre4 (and still use pre4) - it?s a great thing. Since these day?s a part of my VPN relies on a http-tunnel (because you used a single TCP connection as carrier). With 1.0pre4 that was very easy to setup using the TCPonly setting. But with 1.0pre5 it seems you changed the carrier connection setup, so that my old setup didn?t work anymore. In the meantime you

On 27/07/17 14:13, lejeczek wrote: > ... or in other words - can samba break (on Centos 7.3) if > one goes with gluster version to high? > > hi fellas. > > I wonder because I see: > > smbd[4088153]: Unknown gluster ACL version: -847736808 > smbd[4088153]: [2017/07/27 13:12:54.047332, 0] > ../source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c:1365(gluster_to_smb_acl) >

_____ Hi, I've accidently found "tinc" and very interesting in using it. I 'm finding way to setup vpn to tunnel the link between two machines, one is running Microsoft windows 2000 server and another is Solaris 8. I would like to setup the w2k machine as VPN server, while the Solaris as a client. Can I do that by using "tinc"? Could you please advise which

Thank you for the acknowledgement. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:39 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > yes, I see things got lost in transit, I said before: > > I did from first time and now not rejected. > now I'm restarting fourth(newly added) peer's glusterd > and.. it seems to work. <- HERE! (even though.... > > and then I asked: >

Executing "gluster volume set all cluster.op-version <op-version>"on all the existing nodes will solve this problem. If issue still persists please provide me following logs (working-cluster + newly added peer) 1. glusterd.info file from /var/lib/glusterd from all nodes 2. glusterd.logs from all nodes 3. info file from all the nodes. 4. cmd-history from all the nodes. Thanks

Hi, I have tried the LocalDiscovery feature of tinc. The problem is that it also sends broadcast probes out the CPN interface *and* detects nodes on the VPN. A connection is then established through the tunnel, which effectively breaks connectivity between the two nodes. I do not think that discovering hosts on the VPN makes sense in any way. How can it be disabled? I could easily netfilter

Hi All Could a VPN be used to help with SIP Tunneling and QoS issues. State 1: Two IP Networks Connected via the Public Internet transmitting VoIP Traffic Say a VoIP User and VoIP Termination Provider. Each side can put QoS onto their part, but if QoS does NOT exist between them then call quality will be bad anyhow. State 2: Same as above except a VPN tunnel is setup between each side. Thus

Ravi/Karthick, If one of the self heal process is down, will the statstics heal-count command work? On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:24 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > 1) one peer, out of four, got separated from the network, from the rest of > the cluster. > 2) that unavailable(while it was unavailable) peer got detached with > "gluster peer detach" command

Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > >> Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster volume status >> and gluster peer status. >> >> Apart from above info, please provide glusterd logs,

Hello list, I need to provide internet access through a proxy server on a central office to a remote Lan on a branch office (LAN-B). Also there is an internal server that LAN-B machines should reach. Below there is a simple diagram. Right now I have an IPsec VPN tunnel between offices, and LAN-B can acces LAN-A machines without problems. But LAN-B machines can't access the remote proxy or

Greetings, I''ve got a server with a bunch of vpn (openvpn) tunnels terminating on it. I''m trying to limit the total bandwidth the tunnels can use to 3mbit. So I applied a rule like this: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 90 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 15k # Default rule for

1) one peer, out of four, got separated from the network, from the rest of the cluster. 2) that unavailable(while it was unavailable) peer got detached with "gluster peer detach" command which succeeded, so now cluster comprise of three peers 3) Self-heal daemon (for some reason) does not start(with an attempt to restart glusted) on the peer which probed that fourth peer. 4) fourth

Hi all, This is probably not the right place for this question, but maybe someone can help me out. I am trying to setup a VPN between two private addresses, using iproute2 (which is my only excuse for mailing this list). The setup is as below : eth0 ppp0 Wireless ppp0 eth0