similar to: Are there any news on zfs snapshots support?

Yes. It is in the review phase . Actually Sriram implemented zfs snapshot and Mark implemented the brtfs and Mark merged these two patches [1]. Adding them in cc . Reviews are most welcome. [1] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17865/ Regards Rafi KC On 08/17/2017 05:22 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Hi, > Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. > are there any

Interesting table Karan!, Could you please tell us how you did the benchmark? fio or iozone orsimilar? thanks Arman. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Collin, > > During our arbiter latency testing for completion of ops we found the > below results:- an arbiter node in another data centre and both the data > bricks in the

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:40:08AM +0200, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Interesting problem... > Did you considered an insider job?( comes to mind http://verelox.com > <https://t.co/dt1c78VRxA> recent troubles) I would be really really surprised, we are only 5 / 6 with access and as far as I know no one has a problem with the company. The last person to leave did so last year, and we

Interesting problem... Did you considered an insider job?( comes to mind http://verelox.com <https://t.co/dt1c78VRxA> recent troubles) On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:30 AM, W Kern <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > > > On 8/6/2017 4:57 PM, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: > > > Gluster already uses a vlan, the problem is that there is no easy way > that I know of to tell

It was simple emulation of network packets on the port of the server node using tc tool tc qdisc add dev <port> root netem delay <time>ms. The files were created using dd tool (in-built in linux) and mkdir. Post the IO's we verified with no pending heals. Thanks & Regards On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Arman Khalatyan <arm2arm at gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting

Apologies for the late reply. Further to this, if my Linux clients are connecting uing glusterfs-fuse and I have my volumes defined like this: dc1srv1:/gv_fileshare dc2srv1:/gv_fileshare dc1srv2:/gv_fileshare dc2srv2:/gv_fileshare (replica 2) How do I ensure that clients in dc1 prefer dc1srv1 and dc1srv2 while clients in dc2 prefer the dc2 servers? Is it simply a matter of ordering in

Hi all, Can anyone in this mailing list answer a few theoretical question which r confusing me. Here is the scenario I have a total Bandwidth of 2Mbps for a private LAN I am managing. I am using cbq standard script available online and for controlling bandwidth, squid and iptables. I have diff. packages for client. One: server own services access (unlimited bandwidth means no delays or

Hi, Is there any tested good HTB script for traffic shaping available like as that of CBQ available at. http://freshmeat.net/projects/cbq.init I am n new bie and need to work on htb. -- Regards, M Arman _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi all, I have a similar question like many asked before I know but Please help as i cant figure out where the problem is and how should I tackle. I have 2 ISP connections. I want to share the bandwidth from both. I have copied the script from many places and created my own after changes. Problem is that only one connection is utilized at a time. Not both working. ratio of consuming

brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM, <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > >>Just a completely different question...is there any plans

Hi, I have setup about a year ago a BTRFS RAID 1 filesystem on two 2TB Western Digital WD20EARS hard drives and I have created subvolumes that I mount regularly as I need them. I put mostly music, videos and various files on them as well as some Git bare repositories for my work files but for the last couple of weeks, there seems to be some activity happening on the drives for a few minutes and

Hello, I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a production environment the same functionality as they would have on a Netapp NFS share. The O/S I will be using is CentOS 5 or 6 (max flex on which one) and the hardware is a disk array directly (12 SAS disks 7TB un-configured brand new) attached to a HP 580 G 7. I've done some reading on ZFS on Linux ,fuse-ZFS,

On 18/05/2019 10:22, Hendrik Friedel via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I a bit surprised to get no replies at all... > How come? Lack of information? Lack of clarity? > > Greetings, > Hendrik > No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs and quotas. Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf etc. Why are you using a filesystem that your

On 18/05/2019 14:19, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello > >> No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs >> and quotas. > I would have thought that btrfs is becoming more mainstream now. And > then, Samba and Quotas should be rather common... >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > >> Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf

I have 4 partitions on my hard drive 1 = /boot on ext2 2 = Swap 3 = / on brtfs 4 = /home on btrfs The uuid on partition 3 on my last boot was cloned to partition 4, so when I try to mount either 3 or 4 they both mount the / partition. We tried 7182011 git, and the current version in the ARCH 1062010, and neither had an option for resetting the UUID that we could find.  Both partitions were

Thanks Rafi, that's understood now :) I'm considering to deploy gluster on a 4 x 40 TB? bricks, do you think it would better to make 1 LVM partition for each Volume I need or to make one Big LVM partition and start multiple volumes on it ? We'll store mostly big files (videos) on this environement. Le 11/10/2017 ? 09:34, Mohammed Rafi K C a ?crit?: > > On 10/11/2017 12:20

All, We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS 1.0.13-1. The list of changes are listed below. For the UnitedLinux/SuSe release, the i686 and IA64 rpms have been built with the latest kernel, SP3-241. For the Redhat AS2.1 IA64 release, the rpms have been built with the e.43 kernel. The module will not load on AS2.1 IA64 kernels < e.43. For Redhat i686 kernels, Redhat's kernel ABI

Hi All, I'm attending both DevConf (25-28) and Fosdem (3-4). If any of you are attending the conferences and would like to talk about gluster, please feel free to ping me through irc nick rafi on freenode or message me on +436649795838 Regards Rafi KC

Hello, I've problem with xapian or sth. Ubuntu 8.04, ruby 1.9.3 with rvm, when Im trying to initialize database, Im getting this error: irb > require 'xapian' ==> true irb > database = Xapian::WritableDatabase.new('/full_path/db/xapian_db/development', Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN) ArgumentError: Wrong arguments for overloaded method

I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are there any how to's on how to do that?