similar to: Split a data.frame

Hello, Maybe something like the following. splitDF <- function(data, col, s){ n <- nrow(data) inx <- which(data[[col]] %in% s) lapply(seq_along(inx), function(i){ k <- if(inx[i] < n) (inx[i] + 1):(inx[i + 1]) data[k, ] }) } splitDF(DF, "name", split_str) Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, Christofer Bogaso

Hi Joshua, thanks for your prompt reply. However as I said, sum() function I used here just for demonstrating the problem, I have other custom function to implement, not necessarily sum() I am looking for a generic solution for above problem. Any better idea? Thanks, On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Joshua Ulrich <josh.m.ulrich at gmail.com> wrote: > Use a `width` of integer index

Hi again, I am exploring if R can help me to get all possible combinations of members in a group. Let say I have a group with 5 members : A, B, C, D, E Now I want to generate all possible unique combinations with all possible lengths from that group e.g. 1st combination : A 2nd combination : B ..... 5th combination : E 6th combination : A, B 7th combination : B, C .... last combination: A, B,

Replace "sum" with your custom function's name. I don't see any reason why that wouldn't work, and the problem with my solution is not clear in your response. r <- rollapplyr(x, seq_along(x), yourCustomFunctionGoesHere) On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Christofer Bogaso <bogaso.christofer at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joshua, thanks for your prompt reply. However

ummm, Ista, it's 2^n. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Ista Zahn <istazahn at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Christofer Bogaso >

Hi again, I am wondering there is any function for 'zoo' time series, where I can apply a user defined function rolling window basis, wherein window size is ever increasing i.e. not fixed. For example, let say I have below user defined function and a zoo time series : > library(zoo) > UDF = function(x) sum(x) > TS = zoo(rnorm(10), seq(as.Date('2017-01-01'),

Below is my full implementation (tried to make it simple as for demonstration) Lapply_me = function(X = X, FUN = FUN, Apply_MC = FALSE, ...) { if (Apply_MC) { return(mclapply(X, FUN, ...)) } else { if (any(names(list(...)) == 'mc.cores')) { myList = list(...)[!names(list(...)) %in% 'mc.cores'] } return(lapply(X, FUN, myList)) } } Lapply_me(as.list(1:4), function(xx) { if (xx ==

Hi all, please see my code: > library(zoo) > a <- as.yearmon("March-2010", "%B-%Y") > b <- as.yearmon("May-2010", "%B-%Y") > > nn <- (b-a)*12 # number of months in between them > nn [1] 2 > as.integer(nn) [1] 1 What is the correct way to find the number of months between "a" and "b", still

The reason that it works for Apply_MC=TRUE is that in that case you call mclapply(X,FUN,...) and the mclapply() function strips off the mc.cores argument from the "..." list before calling FUN, so FUN is being called with zero arguments, exactly as it is declared. A quick workaround is to change the line Lapply_me(as.list(1:4), function(xx) { to Lapply_me(as.list(1:4),

My modified function looks below : Lapply_me = function(X = X, FUN = FUN, Apply_MC = FALSE, ...) { if (Apply_MC) { return(mclapply(X, FUN, ...)) } else { if (any(names(list(...)) == 'mc.cores')) { myList = list(...)[!names(list(...)) %in% 'mc.cores'] } return(lapply(X, FUN, myList)) } } Here, I am not passing ... anymore rather passing myList On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:37 PM,

Dear all, I would like to ask one question related to statistics, for specifically on defining dummy variables. As of now, I have come across 3 different kind of dummy variables (assuming I am working with Seasonal dummy, and number of season is 4): > dummy1 <- diag(4) > for(i in 1:3) dummy1 <- rbind(dummy1, diag(4)) > dummy1 <- dummy1[,-4] > > dummy2 <- dummy1 >

@Eric - with this approach I am getting below error : Error in FUN(X[[i]], ...) : unused argument (list()) On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Christofer, > You cannot assign to list(...). You can do the following > > myList <- list(...)[!names(list(...)) %in% 'mc.cores'] > > HTH, > Eric > > On Sun, Mar

Dear all, let say I have following list: Dat <- vector("list", length = 26) names(Dat) <- LETTERS My_Function <- function(x) return(rnorm(5)) Dat1 <- lapply(Dat, My_Function) However I want to apply my function 'My_Function' for all elements of 'Dat' except the elements having 'names(Dat) == "P"'. Here I have specified the name

Hi, Following expression returns only the first element ifelse(T, c(1,2,3), c(5,6)) However I am looking for some one-liner expression like above which will return the entire vector. Is there any way to achieve this?

Hi again, I am struggling to extract the number part from below string : "\"cm_ffm\":\"563.77\"" Basically, I need to extract 563.77 from above. The underlying number can be a whole number, and there could be comma separator as well. So far I tried below : > library(stringr) > str_extract("\"cm_ffm\":\"563.77\"",

Dear all, when I start R, I want that the console window should be in the Maximized size automatically. Can somebody help me how to achieve that? Thanks and regards,

Hello again, I want to remove "$" sign and replace with nothing in my text. Therefore I used following code: > gsub("$|,", "", "$232,685.35436") [1] "$232685.35436" However I could not remove '$' sign. Can somebody help me why is it so? Thanks and regards

That's fine. The issue is how you called Lapply_me(). What did you pass as the argument to FUN? And if you did not pass anything that how is FUN declared? You have not shown that in your email. On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Christofer Bogaso < bogaso.christofer at gmail.com> wrote: > My modified function looks below : > > Lapply_me = function(X = X, FUN = FUN, Apply_MC =

Dear all. Let say I have a group of codes which will be used in many places in my overall R-code files. These group of codes will be used within a for-loop (with a big length, like 10000 times) and also many other places outside of that for loop. As this group of codes are being used in many places, I thought to put them within a user-defined function. Here my question is, is there any speed

Dear all, assume I have a matrix with just 1 row. Now suppose I want to fetch 1st few rows from that matrix, however resulting object becomes vector. Here is 1 such example: > matrix(1:5, 1) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 1 2 3 4 5 > > matrix(1:5, 1)[,-1] [1] 2 3 4 5 Can somebody point me how to keep resulting object as matrix with same row? Ofcourse I