similar to: Specifying priors in a multi-response MCMCglmm

1. (Mainly) Statistical issues are generally off topic on this list. You might want to try the r-sig-mixed-models list instead. 2. However, I think a better answer is to seek local statistical expertise in order to have an extended discussion about your research intent in order to avoid producing yet more irreproducible psychological research. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with

Hi Bert, That was distinctly unhelpful, and your outward hostility to a field you obviously don't understand reveals a regrettable level of ignorance. By the way, my research is Anthropology despite my job title. Michelle On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > 1. (Mainly) Statistical issues are generally off topic on this list. > You

Hi, Thanks in advance for any help on this question. I'm running multinomial models using the MCMCglmm package. The models have 5 outcome variables (each with count data), and an additional two random effects built into the models. The issue is that when I use the following code, the summary only gives me results for four of the outcome variables. Here is the code for my model: m3.random

> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Michelle Kline <michelle.ann.kline at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks in advance for any help on this question. I'm running multinomial > models using the MCMCglmm package. The models have 5 outcome variables > (each with count data), and an additional two random effects built into the > models. The issue is that when I use

Hi David, Thanks for your comment. I haven't posted the data because they are unpublished and include human subjects so there are issues with sharing on a list serv, but I thought perhaps someone had encountered a similar problem and would already know the answer. I will reconsider whether my University's ethics approval would allow me to post the data and update the question if I think

On 02/05/18 09:53, Michelle Kline wrote: > Hi Bert, > > That was distinctly unhelpful Not if you actually follow Bert's advice. > and your outward hostility to a field you > obviously don't understand reveals a regrettable level of ignorance. I didn't see any hostility to any field. Bert, like many of us, objects to people blithely and arrogantly applying possibly

Hello people, I used primarily mutt and sendmail for many years. (And elm before mutt.) All my mail was saved into ~/Mail. Messages from, say, smith at foo.ber were stored in ~/Mail/smith; all mail from smith was catenated into one file, and if I wanted to find something that smith had written, I would just cd to ~/Mail and grep or egrep on a likely word or phrase. Is there a script

Hi all, I'm hoping I might be able to get some help with some issues specifying priors for MCMCglmm. I'm trying to fit a gaussian glmm using MCMCglmm to a data set with two (correlated) response variables. The response variables are both logit-transformed proportions (there are a few reasons why I've chosen these with gaussian error over binomal glmm, which I won't go into).

I have been trying to preform both a bartlett's test and an arcsine transformation on some average percentage data. I've tried inputting it different ways and I keep getting the same error message: > head(workingdata) DYAD BEFORE AFTER 1 BG-FL 4.606772 5.787520 2 BG-LL 5.467503 7.847395 3 AD-MV 5.333735 11.107380 4 MM-FL 5.578708 12.063500 5 MM-MV 2.037605 6.415303 6 MM-RM

Hi, First, I am new to dovecot. Before my Jan '08 meltdown, sendmail was sufficient. A friend set up dovecot and since things just-worked, I was happy with that. Now I have a new mailserver and what was installed nearly two years ago fails. My pal installed things in dovecot.conf this way: default_mail_env = maildir:~/Maildir but the new mail environment is too different to be

I am writing to inquire about a warning message that I receive when trying to model a random slope and intercept at the second level of a 3-level model. Specifically, I am testing a 3-level model in which time (WEEK) is nested in participants (PARTICIP) and participants are nested in dyads (DYADID). The goal is to examine how an interpersonal style (CORUMTO) one week predicts changes in

I purchased an Intel D945GNT motherboard and it comes in the BIOS with an option to create a RAID 0 or RAID 1 volumes using my existing two SATA disks. However when installing Centos 4.3 x86_64 I see the the installer recognices the two drives and does not "see" the RAID 0. Is that ok? Should I disable the RAID in the BIOS and then go for a LVM+RAID 0 setup in the installer ? Since it

Hello all. This is a question that I should be able to answer, but the old grey cells aren't working. My Google-Fu must not be up to snuff, either. I have a MOXA IP-RS232 converter that I'm going to be using over an RF WAN and I need to confirm the actual data rate that I'll be able to achieve. I have the drivers loaded (/dev/ttyr00) and a loopback plug on the end of the device. I

I have a friend who has been having an intermittent problem with his nice, shiny new IBM x226 server. It's a Xeon processor, 1.5Gb RAM, hardware RAID controller running CentOS 3 The system will will sometimes run for a couple of weeks, then simply lock up -- nothing on the console, no response to pings, no "caps-lock" lights, no kernel panic indicators, nothing in the logs to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am running 1.6.0.15 and am trying to get IMAP storage working. I have had no trouble doing so, except that I wish to create a subfolder in my account for voicemail, such that I have: #voicemail/ INBOX Old Family Friends Work I can set IMAPFOLDER=#voicemail.INBOX in voicemail.conf and successfully get voicemail to work as expected.

Hi. I just installed Centos 4. I''m pretty sure that I chose to have it install postgresql but when the system came up, it wasn''t there. No worries. I installed it from the net with ''yum''. Unfortunately, when I started it up and it tried to init the database, I got a bunch of SELinux errors: Mar 3 13:24:22 dirty kernel: audit(1109874262.006:0): avc:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I remember someone wrote a great document concerning Polycom server provisioning that provided a way to ensure that updates to the firmware did not overwrite customizations. I'll be damned if I can remember where I saw it. It may have been discussed during a VUC session or may have been on this list. Either way, I'm unable to google my way

Well, I have been busy getting child #4 off on her way to college (joining #2). So now it is quite with just the 2 youngest and I can get work done again!. tar stops as follows: /root/.nautilus/metafiles/x-nautilus-desktop:%2F%2F52F.xml tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. I thought perhaps this is some file locked becuase I was running from a terminal session in gnome. So I

I have an application where we receive calls on an inbound PRI. After hours, our Asterisk box dials our answering service on an outbound PRI and then bridges the caller to the answering service. The flow looks like this: (CALLER)INBOUND_PRI --> CONTEXT --> GOSUB(Incoming) --> GOSUB(bridge-to-anssrv) --> DIAL(answering_service) --> OUTBOUND_PRI(service) This has been working

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here's one that may be of interest to any upgraders. If you rely on the behavior of gosub you may want to make note of this change. I have an incoming call context: exten => _XXXX,n,GoSub(incoming,${EXTEN},1(${EXTEN})); that is supposed to gosub into the incoming extension at priority 1. Versions before 1.6.0.6 would drop into the