similar to: Error - PMML Conversion of a Random-Forest Model using the randomForest Package

Hi, I am having some trouble using R 2.13.1 for generating a pmml object of of class "c('randomForest.formula', 'randomForest')" I see that these methods are available: > methods(pmml) [1] pmml.coxph* pmml.hclust* pmml.itemsets* pmml.kmeans* pmml.ksvm* pmml.lm* pmml.multinom* pmml.nnet* pmml.rpart* [10] pmml.rsf* pmml.rules* pmml.survreg*

Didn't realize the message was cc'ed to R-help. Here's my reply... ________________________________ From: Liaw, Andy Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:35 AM To: 'Li GUO' Subject: RE: Can I estimate strength and correlation of Random Forest in R package " randomForest"? The strength and correlation among trees in a random forest are based on the predictions of

This is a presenation from the R Users Group (Bay Area) Covers building predictive analytic models in R, exporting in PMML and using ADAPA for model deployment and execution. Introduction to the Predictive Model Markup Language (PMML) standard and how it helps to overcome memory and speed limitations of R and makes models available for operational deployment and integration via web services.

Hello! I want to estimate strength and correlation of RandomForest, but in package "randomForest" there is not an interface to get it. I think I must to change the source code. Is there any advise? Thanks, Li [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-users, While making a prediction using the randomForest function (package randomForest) I'm getting the following error message: "Error in predict.randomForest(model, newdata = CV) : No forest component in the object" Here's my complete code. For reproducing this task, please find my 2 data sets attached ( http://www.nabble.com/file/p17855119/data.rar data.rar ).

Version 1.2.0 of pmml has been released and is available from CRAN. The pmml package (http://rattle.togaware.com/pmml.html) is part of the Rattle data mining suite http://rattle.togaware.com. It generates representations of analytic models built in R using the open standard predictive modelling markup language (http://www.dmg.org/). PMML represents analytic models in an application independent

Version 1.2.0 of pmml has been released and is available from CRAN. The pmml package (http://rattle.togaware.com/pmml.html) is part of the Rattle data mining suite http://rattle.togaware.com. It generates representations of analytic models built in R using the open standard predictive modelling markup language (http://www.dmg.org/). PMML represents analytic models in an application independent

Hi, I have been using some code for multivariate random forests. The output from this code is a list object with all the same values as from randomForest, but the model object is, of course, not of the class randomForest. So, I was hoping to modify the code for predict.randomForest to work for predicting the multivariate model to new data. This is my first attempt at modifying code from a

Hi, Can someone please offer me some guidance? I imported some data. One of the columns called "JOBTITLE" when imported was imported as a factor column with 416 levels. I subset the data in such a way that only 4 levels have data in "JOBTITLE" and tried running randomForest but it complained about "JOBTITLE" having more than 32 categories. I know that is the limit

Hi, I'm using package "caret" to rank predictors using random forest model and draw predictors importance plot. I used below commands: rf.fit<-randomForest(x,y,ntree=500,importance=TRUE) ## "x" is matrix whose columns are predictors, "y" is a binary resonse vector ## Then I got the ranked predictors by ranking

Dear All, I am using randomForest to predict the final selling price of some items. As it often happens, I have a lot of (noisy) historical data, but the question is not so much about data cleaning. The dataset for which I need to carry out some predictions are fairly recent sales or even some sales that will took place in the near future. As a consequence, historical data should be somehow

Are the results dramatically different? The result would be expected to be somewhat different, as setting importance=TRUE would make many calls to the random number generator (for permuting OOB data in each variable), making all but the first tree in the forest different than if importance=FALSE. Cheers, Andy > From: Scott Gilpin > > Hi - > > When using the randomForest

Dear All, I want to save the XML representation of a model using PMML. Then I want to read the model and predict using the model and a new dataset. This is described in this blog post : https://www.r-bloggers.com/predictive-modeling-using-r-and-the-openscoring-engine-a-pmml-approach/ I am able to save the PMML representation of the model. I am not able to read this representation convert it

Hi - When using the randomForest function for regression, I get different results for mean-squared error of the predictions depending on whether or not I specify to calculate variable importance. There is an example below. I looked briefly at the source code, but couldn't find anything that would indicate why calculating variable importance would (or should) change predictions. I'm

Hi All, I am looking for a reference that explains how the randomForest function in the randomForest package uses the classwt parameter. Here: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e4/help/08/05/12088.html Andy Liaw suggests not using classwt. And according to: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-help-with-RandomForest-classwt-option-td817149.html it has "not been implemented" as of 2007.

Hi, here are three results of random forest (version 4.0-1). The results seem to be more or less the same which is strange because I changed the classwt. I hoped that for example classwt=c(0.45,0.1,0.45) would result in fewer cases classified as class 2. Did I understand something wrong? Christian x1rf <- randomForest(x=as.data.frame(mfilters[cvtrain,]),

After checking the original data in Excel for blanks and running Summary(cm3) to identify any null values in my data, I'm unable to identify an instances. Yet when I attempted to use the data in Random Forest, I get the following error. Is there something that Random Forest is reading as null which is not actually null? Is there a better way to check for this? > library(randomForest) >

I am trying to run a partialPlot with Random Forest (as I have done many times before). First I run my forest... Cell is a 6 level factor that is the dependent variable - all other variables are predictors, most of these are factors as well. predCell<-randomForest(x=tempdata[-match("Cell",names(tempdata))],y=tempdata$Cell,importance=T) Then I try my partial plot to look at the

Dear R users, I have a question on the confusion matrix generated by function randomForest. I used the entire data set to generate the forest, for example: > print(iris.rf) Call: randomForest(formula = Species ~ ., data = iris, importance = TRUE, keep.forest = TRUE) confusion setosa versicolor virginica class.error setosa 50 0 0 0.00

Hi all, Had struggled in getting "Strata" in randomForest to work on this. Can I get randomForest for each of its TREE, to get ALL sample from some strata to build tree, while leaving some strata TOTALLY untouched as oob? e.g. in below, how I can tell RF to, - for tree 1 in the forest, to use only Site A and B to build the tree, while using the WHOLE Site C data for the oob error