similar to: flatpak installation package?

Of course... R _is_ open source. However, it is unwise to assume that the volunteers scratching itches for their preferred distros will take on additional work... it is more likely that you will need to take on scratching that new itch. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 16, 2018 7:36:45 AM PST, Treutwein Bernhard <Bernhard.Treutwein at Verwaltung.Uni-Muenchen.DE>

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:10:31PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote: > > I think what you're looking for here is Flatpak. > Just a off-topic question (maybe in the future of EL less off-topic); > Does the concept of flatpak make updates in general more complicated > (e.g. security issues in libraries)? The centralized concept of "shared > libraries" does support by

I am using NUT on Linux Mint with no issues. Installed from PPA. However I have tried on 3 occasions to build from source for Solus 3 and have had no luck. Is there a possibility of NUT being built into a Flatpak so all distributions can use it. If it was available on Flathub it would be a simple and foolproof way of installing it. Many thanks for a great application.

I had posted the problem described below about two weeks ago, and I would like to add some odd behaviour even on machines where the zip image is loaded correctly (without divide by zero). If I call DOS fdisk, when booted from the image, fdisks asks if it should enable the large disk support and the returns immediately to the command prompt. regards -- Bernhard Treutwein

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:3303 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:3303 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: d585e981d360cf9e26ceb0e5276a3b859414bfb1a228540caa217d24c3614e71 flatpak-0.8.7-3.el7_4.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2766 Moderate Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2766 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 00ba438aa19e1eb39eb037cf60533fdd3d94f45f7e11d537724c4e44a60053b5 flatpak-0.8.8-4.el7_5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0375 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0375 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 0d91d14ae70aed2ec16d147980f44adf410a9ddf2c05eb5b77c3285e88a22959 flatpak-1.0.2-4.el7_6.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1024 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1024 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 714b71083f3fd508f772cb66372d724a3cb8682f174bd8898e65d3e80d279b54 flatpak-1.0.2-5.el7_6.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3073 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3073 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 6ba3194f1969dab776d71a65d8d1f433a8888cd5b842aae0e77e45d602d485f0 flatpak-1.0.9-8.el7_7.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:0837 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0837 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 23a7dd7134cad5bfe5d0819658281af9cc0b22c5fd2c52ee74ed650605114957 flatpak-1.0.9-9.el7_7.x86_64.rpm

Hi there! I recently installed centos 8 on my laptop. I have the following problems 1. I tried the use the default evolution 3.28. The problem with 3.28 is that when i try to create an event i get the error "Failed to create an event in the calendar ?CalDAV : Calendar?" "Cannot create calendar object: Failed to put data: HTTP error code 400 (Bad Request)" 2.I tried

First of all thanks for your fast reply. Second. The server im trying to use is https://dav.mailbox.org/caldav I dont think its a problem with my configuration (although i can always be wrong). I suspect a bug in evolution because sometimes it works. Sometimes i manage to create an event sometimes i cant. I started evolution from a terminal and i noticed that when i fail to create an event i

>It is a distribution independent package format, where the applications run >in a kind of sandbox. Flatpak is supported by RedHat/Fedora/CentOS/Scientific >Linux as well as Debian/Ubuntu, and Arch. > See also: https://flatpak.org/getting.html -- Bernhard

Le 10/05/2020 ? 01:41, Liam O'Toole a ?crit?: > I recommend installing zoom from flatpak: > > https://flathub.org/apps/details/us.zoom.Zoom > > It will pull in the freedesktop runtime, which contains the required > libraries. No need to fiddle with LD_PRELOAD and the like. +1 on that. I've just installed Skype from Flatpak on my workstation. Not only does it work out

On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote: > Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies > there... :) Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!? I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about it, I still don't understand how it could overcome the dependency problem with the skypeforlinux

Am 21.03.23 um 23:10 schrieb Fred: > that's what I thought at first, but there is no gimp-devel either > installed, or available. > I think you will get more trouble because this plugin uses python2 code and I am not sure if this is supported under EL9. You could try the flatpak version of this plugin ... $ flatpak remote-add --user --if-not-exists flathub

On 2020-05-09 19:41, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Sat, 09 May, 2020 at 16:02:17 -0400, mark wrote: >> Hi, folks, >> >> Updated CentOS 7 the other day. Updated zoom last night. Ancient (15 yr >> old) USB camera, Logitech QuickCam Express. >> >> If I run LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libv4l/v4l2convert.so cheese, I get video. >> Zoom, with or without the

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:25:36PM +0200, hw wrote: > >In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container > >and I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container. > It was only an example. The point of doing that is to use different versions of > xterm and of emacs as come by default. How else would I do that when non-default >

I'm trying to switch from a standard floppy emulation rescue disk (PQ-Magic & Ghost) to a no emulation large floppy using isolinux & memdisk. I finally got the CD booting on two systems (see below) but on a third system I get a divide by zero message and/or other error from DOS, which is starting to boot correctly. It appears to happen during loading the drivers in config.sys. It is an

Hi all, So i wanted to kick off this mailing list by trying to round up a few things which have been discussed recently, at GUADEC, in f2f conversations afterwards, or shot over emails between a few people. It's been discussed for a while that we want to create a tiny base runtime with bst. The upshot is this will homogenize the metadata used in the build process for Flatpak, GNOME