similar to: Optim function returning always initial value for parameter to be optimized

Hello, I'm trying to fminimize the following problem: You have a data frame with 2 columns. data.input= data.frame(state1 = (1:500), state2 = (201:700) ) with data that partially overlap in terms of values. I want to minimize the assessment error of each state by using this function: err.th.scalar <- function(threshold, data){ state1 <- data$state1 state2 <- data$state2

Hi, I want to remove the entire row from the dataset if any of the row contains blank or NA my dataset look like State Year Y X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 State1 1960 27.8 397.5 42.2 50.7 78.3 65.8 State2 1960 29.9 413.3 38.1 52 79.2 66.9 State1 1961 29.8 439.2 40.3 54 79.2 67.8 State2 1961 30.8 459.7 39.5 79.2 69.6 State1 1962 31.2 492.9 37.3 54.7 77.4 68.7 State2 1962 528.6 38.1 80.2 73.6 State1 1963

Hi I have records like like this X1 X2 State 34 72 state1 9 63 state1 49 31 state1 60 34 state1 80 73 state1 60 20 state2 59 87 state2 88 20 state2 71 66 state2 65 56 state2 59 16 state1 60 100 state2 I want to get the summarize value like mean median histogram for X1 and X2 based on state. I'm using FOR loop for this. Is there any method to remove for loop and use apply or any

I'm trying to write a function that takes several objects with many different attributes and then changes their attributes. So what I wanted to happen in the simplified example below is for the function to change the attributes of the objects state1 and state2 that are passed to it. But because stateA and stateB are local, this isn't working. Are there any easy solutions? e.g., if I could

Deare R users I am new to R. What I want to do is explained below;- I have table called States.Prob which is given below Prob of States Changes State1 State2 State3 State4 A Pa1 Pa2 Pa3 Pa4 B Pb1 Pb2 Pb3 Pb4 C Pc1 Pc2 Pc3 Pc4 D Pd1 Pd2 Pd3 Pd4 and I have a dataframe called

Greetings all, I have two sets of data that I would like to investigate. The first is gene/genome related data given different 'cell-states'. The second set of data is relates the genes to a biological pathway. /(I think in pictures so here goes.)/ *dataframe1* gene, cell-state1, cell-state2 gene1, x1, y1 gene2, x2, y2 gene.x, ..., ... *dataframe2* pathway1, gene-x1, gene-x2, ...

Deare R users I am new to R. What I want to do is explained below;- I have table called States.Prob which is given below:- This table gives the probabilities of the changes in the swap curve depending on the state of the swap curve. I want to put these probabilities in my dataframe mydata(given after the prob table). Prob of States Changes State1 State2 State3 State4 a

I'm trying to implement *MUL_LOHI for my processor. My processor has mulxss (e.g.) that gives the 32 high bits of a 64 bit multiply. I tried this in ios2ISelDAGToDAG.cpp: /// Mul/Div with two results case ISD::SMUL_LOHI: case ISD::UMUL_LOHI: { SDValue Op1 = Node->getOperand(0); SDValue Op2 = Node->getOperand(1); AddToISelQueue(Op1);

The instruction mnemonics for the immediate forms of bit-test instructions including bt, btr and bts, btc do not work. llvm-mc barfs with: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix This is highly user-unfriendly, since we can easily infer what the user meant by inspecting $imm and translating the instruction appropriately. Do it exactly as the Intel manual describes. Note that

Dear all, my problem is following. I know Stata, but currently I have to use R. Could You please help in finding the analogy to R. (1) creating of City-Dummy. I know in Stata: g byte city=0 replace city=1 if city==12&year==2000 and (2) Create a Time-Dummy-Variable g byte T2000=0 replace T2000=1 if year==2000 (3) I need the City DUmmy for the following combination: I have the

The langref says for the 'add' instruction: Syntax: <result> = add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ; yields {ty}:result <result> = nuw add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ; yields {ty}:result <result> = nsw add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ; yields {ty}:result <result> = nuw nsw add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ;

Peter Zotov писал 09.01.2013 19:59: > Hello. > > I've managed to create a bitcode file (attached; also available at > [1]) which produces > a series of identical errors when verified: > > | Global variable initializer type does not match global variable > type! > | %i.NilClass* @nil > > When ran through llvm-dis and recompiled, through, it verifies >

hi, i'm new in R and i need some help. Please, ¿do you know a function how can process cross tables for many variables and show the result in one table who look like this?: +----------------------------------------------------+ |------------------ | X variable | |----------------- | Xop1 | Xop2 | Xop3|.....| +----------------------------------------------------+ |Yvar1 |

Hi Petr and thanks for your reply, That's the problem I don't want to modify the labels of my legends but the title of the legend in itself inserting my custom text :) Take for example the 1st graph in this tutorial http://www.sthda.com/english/wiki/ggpubr-r-package-ggplot2-based-publication-ready-plots I want to change the "sex" in "sex subscript 2" or "

On 1 Oct 2010, at 13:35, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>> >>>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>> >>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>>>

Introduction: We would like to add new keyword to 'sdiv'\'udiv' instructions i.e. 'no-overflow'. This is the updated solution devised in the discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118257.html The proposed keywords: "nof" stands for 'no-overflow' Syntax: <result> = sdiv nof <ty> <op1>,

On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: > Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. > > I've defined comparison > > > def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; > > > > > But then I end up having the following bug: > >

Please test if r115571 has fixed it. Evan On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: >> >>> Bill Wendling wrote: >>>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote:

Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. I've defined comparison def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; But then I end up having the following bug: Code %0 = zext i8 %data to i32 %1 = zext i16 %crc to i32 %2 = xor i32 %1, %0 %3 = and i32 %2, 1 %4 =

On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >> >> I've defined comparison >> >> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>;