similar to: Sample of a subsample

For personal aesthetic reasons, I changed the name "data" to "dat". Your code, with a slight modification: set.seed (1357) ## for reproducibility dat <- data.frame(var1=seq(1:40), var2=seq(40,1)) dat$sampleNo <- 0 idx <- sample(seq(1,nrow(dat)), size=10, replace=F) dat[idx,"sampleNo"] <-1 ## yielding > dat var1 var2 sampleNo 1 1 40

Hi David, I was about to post a reply when Bert responded. His answer is good and his comment to use the name 'dat' rather than 'data' is instructive. I am providing my suggestion as well because I think it may address what was causing you some confusion (mainly to use "which", but also the missing !) idx2 <- sample( which( (!data$var1%%2) & data$sampleNo==0 ),

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120412/74331e9a/attachment.pl>

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120213/d2a5afa6/attachment.pl>

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120507/f2dfaa17/attachment.pl>

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120422/bb638d28/attachment.pl>

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130513/fe848ce7/attachment.pl>

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130121/317d3f7b/attachment.pl>

Suppose I have a dataframe as follows: dat <- data.frame(id = c(1,1,2,2,2), var1 = c(10,10,20,20,25), var2 = c('foo', 'foo', 'foo', 'foobar', 'foo')) Now, if I were to subset by id, such as: > subset(dat, id==1) id var1 var2 1 1 10 foo 2 1 10 foo I can see that the elements in var1 are exactly the same and the elements in var2 are exactly

Hello, I would like to know if this behaviour in R is as expected. I have a data frame 'dat' with column var1 being character (and not factor). Then I create a new column 'var2' by: > dat[,"var2"] <- dat$var1; Column var2 is now a factor. But if I do: > dat$var2 <- dat$var1; Then column var2 is character (and not factor). I don't want to have

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130304/62581e97/attachment.pl>

Dear all, I have a data set in which the same unit appears 2 or 3 or 4 times. I need to aggregate this data to maintain only one unit by row. But I need to do that based on a comparison between the values of such units. I can't find a function to help me on that. I appreciate any help. Below I provide an example of what I want: This is my data: Units Var1 Var2 Var3 1 B 2

Hello everyone, I am looking at the joint spatial distribution of 2 kinds of organisms (estimated on a grid of points) and want to test for significant association or dissociation. My first question is: do you know a nice technique to do that, considering that I have a limited number of points (36) but that they are repeated (4 times)? I did GLMs to test for correlations between the

Hi, Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless the value idx1 and idx2 is holding. Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? Thanks Shuxin 101 ; CHECK: test6 102 ; CHECK: insertelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, float 1.000000e+00, i32 %idx1 103 ; CHECK:

Greetings R users, My goal is to generate quartile groups of each variable in my data set. I would like each experiment to have its designated group added as a subsequent column. I can accomplish this individually with the following code: brks <- with(data_variables, cut2(var2, g=4)) #I don't want the actual numbers, I need a numbered group data$test1=factor(brks,

Dear R helpers I have a data set sth like this: set.seed(123);dat <- data.frame(ID= c(rep(1,2),rep(2,3), rep(3,3), rep(4,4), rep(5,5)), var1 =rnorm(17, 35,2), var2=runif(17,0,1)) dat ID var1 var2 1 1 33.87905 0.02461368 2 1 34.53965 0.47779597 3 2 38.11742 0.75845954 4 2 35.14102 0.21640794 5 2 35.25858 0.31818101 6 3 38.43013

Hi, I have my data in below format. position var1 var2 2 .1 10 3 .29 89 12 .56 100 425 .34 1234 6546 .12 21 .... ..... ..... .... ..... ......

Hi Shuxin I think i might have written that test. And yeah, no matter what values you get you’ll get a 0.0. Its probably a bad test case, but i can’t remember if it exposed a bug in this form or not. Since writing it Chandler rewrote SROA anyway so the original bug is long gone. Thanks, Pete On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >

# build a sample data frame illustrating the problem ids<-c(rep(1234,5),rep(5436,3),rep(7864,4)) years<-c(seq(1990,1994,by=1),seq(1991,1993,by=1),seq(1990,1993,by=1)) data<-seq(14,25,by=1) data[6]<-NA DF<-data.frame(Id=ids,Year=years,Data=data) DF Id Year Data 1 1234 1990 14 2 1234 1991 15 3 1234 1992 16 4 1234 1993 17 5 1234 1994 18 6 5436 1991 NA 7

Hello all I have a feeling this is very simple......but I am not sure how to do it My boss has two variables, one is an average of 4 numbers, the other is an average of 3 of those numbers i.e var1 = (X1 + X2 + X3 + X4)/4 var2 = (X1 + X2 + X3)/3 all of the X variables are supposed to be measuring similar constructs not surprisingly, these are highly correlated (r = .98), the question is how