Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "elo v1.0.0: Elo Ratings"
2017 Aug 15
0
arsenal v0.5.0: An Arsenal of 'R' Functions for Large-Scale Statistical Summaries
I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v0.5.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal). There are 4 items I want to mention:
1. arsenal is now on github: https://github.com/eheinzen/arsenal
2. ~10 bugs have been fixed in the latest release.
3. Tired of subsetting data.frames and losing your labels? Try the new keep.labels
2017 Aug 15
0
arsenal v0.5.0: An Arsenal of 'R' Functions for Large-Scale Statistical Summaries
I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v0.5.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal). There are 4 items I want to mention:
1. arsenal is now on github: https://github.com/eheinzen/arsenal
2. ~10 bugs have been fixed in the latest release.
3. Tired of subsetting data.frames and losing your labels? Try the new keep.labels
2019 Mar 26
0
arsenal v3.0.0: An Arsenal of 'R' Functions for Large-Scale Statistical Summaries
I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v3.0.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal)!
"arsenal" has experienced some major growth in the last few months, starting with the release of v2.0.0 in January. We tried to maintain backwards compatibility wherever possible, but had to eliminate it in some places. With that said, here's the
2019 Mar 26
0
arsenal v3.0.0: An Arsenal of 'R' Functions for Large-Scale Statistical Summaries
I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v3.0.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal)!
"arsenal" has experienced some major growth in the last few months, starting with the release of v2.0.0 in January. We tried to maintain backwards compatibility wherever possible, but had to eliminate it in some places. With that said, here's the
2006 Jun 14
0
testing table associations
First, thanks to everyone who replied to my pluralization question
from before! Today I''m confused by associations. I''ve set up a bunch
of associations in my models to describe these relationships:
- each user can have many bookmarks and tags
- each bookmark can have many users and tags
- each tag can have many bookmarks and users
(Part of what is confusing is that I can
2011 May 19
1
update_attributes updates data from second instance of nested form but not the first
Got a weird situation with an update put to a controller with a form with
nested attributes.
On the data below, I am updating data for both items (''0'' and ''1'') in
rosters_attributes (in the example below I am updating the ''name'' attribute
to a new value in both cases. What I am stuck on is that ''1'' gets its data
updated,
2011 Dec 01
1
Hlink node data for 570645 already has path ...
When syncing one backup system (running dirvish, but that's not really
relevant) to a second long-term backup system which uses btrfs
snapshots, I get the following output:
rsync: link "/parasite.oob.telegraaf.net/vservers-var-www/tree/elo/var/www/lokaalx/openx-htdocs/etc/xmlcache/.svn/prop-base/cache_etc-changes_schema-tables-core-12934.bin.svn-base" (in backup-aquagirl) =>
2007 Mar 19
0
Any chess players here?
The Internet Chess Club, launched a new chess interface in August.
Besides being a terrific client for connecting and playing chess
on ICC, it has a built-in chess engine with 14 personalities from
beginner to GM's that you can play off-line. You can also add-in
other chess engines.
If you try it, I'm sure you'll agree it is one of the best chess
clients available. It is now at
2013 Sep 24
1
error when create database mysql with puppetlabs-mysql (v1.0.0)
Good evening, folks.
Using the module''s puppet forge to create a database I get an error below.
Could you help me?
*puppetlabs-mysql (v1.0.0) *
*class mysql_default {*
*
*
* mysql::db { ''mydb'':*
* user => ''root'',*
* password => ''123456'',*
* host => ''localhost'',*
* grant
2015 May 26
0
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
----- Original Message -----
> From: "G?bor Cs?rdi" <csardi.gabor at gmail.com>
> To: "Gabriel Becker" <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu>
> Cc: "Simon Urbanek" <simon.urbanek at r-project.org>, "Rainer M Krug" <Rainer at krugs.de>, r-devel at r-project.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:55:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] MetaCran
2007 Apr 14
2
minor public folder problem still in v1.0.0
This minor problem still exists in the current version.
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-December/018251.html
It's my own fault, I kept meaning to test one of the latest versions before the 1.0
release and never got around to it. Oh well, just mentioning it so it stays on the
list of things to do.
1.0.0 update from RC15 went smoothly here.
Thanks,
Mark Nienberg
2015 May 24
0
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> writes:
> Dear All,
>
> [ I was wondering if this should have gone to the new mailing list. Maybe. ]
>
> As some of you maybe know from my earlier posts, I am building a simple
> search engine for R packages. Now the search engine has a proper web site,
> where you can also browse CRAN packages.
>
> http://www.r-pkg.org/
2015 May 26
0
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
That's true, but issues, checkouts, comments, credit, etc should all be
going to the original repo. Anything else seems grossly unfair to the
package author(s). This issue is exacerbated even further when the the
author isn't developing the package on github at all, and github users may
unintentionally begin to view the forks as the actual canonical sources for
the package.
Also, the
2015 May 26
0
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> That's true, but issues, checkouts, comments, credit, etc should all be
>> going to the original repo.
>
>
> You mean the links? They are, aren't they?
>
Sort of, the link
2015 May 26
0
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org>
wrote:
> One issue I have with this is that it doesn't point to the original GitHub
> repositories of the packages, so you end up with additional repositories on
> Github in Gabor's name that have nothing to do with the actual Github
> repositories of the packages. I understand that it's
2012 Sep 02
3
Loading Chess Data
All,
What would be the most efficient way to load the data at the following
address into a dataframe?
http://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=men
Thanks,
David
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Loading-Chess-Data-tp4642006.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2008 Jun 09
3
Prototype + Chess !?
Not sure how many of you saw this article =>
http://www.prototypejs.org/2008/5/28/an-interview-with-piotr-dachtera
but Chess.com is looking for 1 more JavaScript guru to help build out
Chess.com Live Chess! We need help optimizing the javascript libraries
we are using, etc. Please email chessdev=>gmail if you are interested.
Thanks!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You
2015 May 25
0
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
> wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know about the new website. Some comments:
- Download statistics: Where are they from? CRAN does not monitor downloads
> generally, maybe some selected mirrors do.
>
It's the RStudio mirror only. It is mentioned on the Services page and on
the page of the
2015 May 26
2
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
I cannot speak for other package authors, but for all my own packages,
I have provided the BugReports field in DESCRIPTION that points to the
Github issues page. You can probably use this field to check if a
package is on Github or not. If it is, you may just fork the original
repo instead of creating a new one from the CRAN package. I'm not sure
how technically difficult it would be for you.
2015 May 26
2
MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu>
wrote:
[...]
>
> Well, sort of. I mean if the package is being actively developed not on
> github, forking your archive repo and developing a patch/etc against it
> won't necessarily be particularly effective, as there is no way to have the
> right starting point (state of trunk), right?
>
Well,