similar to: Creating two groups of random numbers

I would suggest to post this to the (recently created) R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list. See: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis Best, Wolfgang >-----Original Message----- >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Naike Wang >Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 08:32 >To: R-help at r-project.org >Subject: [R] Classic fail-safe N >

Hi all, I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the number of missing studies that would bring p-value to the alpha, to be exact)was different than that I got in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0. I wonder why R and CMA got different results. *Below is

Hello, I am having a problem with wine 0.9.45 through 1.1.3. I have an application that worked fine using wine 0.9.45 until I was forced to do a reinstall due to a bad hard drive. Now I always get Error / Unable to allocate enough memory when I run the application. Here is the command I am running: MDCrack-sse.exe --charset=tesTES --algorithm=NTLM1 --minsize=8 --maxsize=8

Hi all, I want to create two groups of random numbers to calculate proportions. The first group is to represent the number of cases in a study. The second group is to represent the sample size of the study. Apparently, the sample size is going to have to be bigger or equal to the number of cases, but the sample size of a study is not necessarily greater than the number of cases of another study.

> On Aug 20, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Steve King <steve at metrokings.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> >> Isn’t the problem the fact that the patch makes it harder for a target to >> get the generic code to reach its custom hook? >> Now the "cheap pow2 sdiv” is merged with the generic

Right now we have a healthy mixture of two ways to respond to -Oz and -Os in LLVM: 1) Pass this info to the PassManagerBuilder and then toggle some flag to the pass to change thresholds. 2) When running over IR, inspect it for the minsize or optsize attribute. Regardless of the particulars of what these mean and/or how they relate to -O2 vs -O3 for example, I'd really like to at least get to

Hi, On 08/07/2015 10:30 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: [...] > Depends. What is the exact declaration of format_long? > > > In the input .ll file it is: > > ; Function Attrs: minsize optsize > define internal i16 @format_long(i16* %res.8.par, i16 %base.9.par, > i32 %x.10.par) #3 { > > which is later changed somewhere in opt to: > > ;

On 08/07/2015 01:53 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] >> On Behalf Of Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev >> Subject: [llvm-dev] load instruction erroneously removed by GVN > >> But between the load and the alloca there is also >> call fastcc void @format_long(i16* %_tmp30, i16 10, i32 10), !dbg !22 >>

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > This has been an idea floating around in my head for a while and after > several discussions with others it continues to hold up so I thought I > would mail it out.

Hai, Rowland did mean, post it without the -v.. Since its an AD server. Run : samba-tool testparm Can you post that that gives a better insight. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > bar???? tombul via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 11:37 > Aan: Rowland Penny > CC: samba >

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 3:48 PM, escha via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> On Aug 19, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Steve King via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> In the targets I know, shifts are >> cheaper than divides in both speed and size. > > From what I remember, udiv by

Sent from my iPad On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > This has been an idea floating

Hi Eli, > I just tried some tests, and I'm seeing a bunch of failures on SPEC at -O3; looks like mostly crashes at runtime. I can try to reduce a testcase if you need it. If you could do that, that would be great. Our testing has been primarily for -Oz and -O2, so I haven’t looked at -O3 at all. > I don't think this is really the right approach. With LTO, you can have a mix of

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:23 PM Wenlei He via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think calling PGSO size opt is probably a bit misleading though. It’s > more of an adaptive opt strategy, and it can improve performance too due to > better locality. We have something similar internally for selecting opt > level based on profile hotness too under AutoFDO. > >

I am trying to use tree to partition a data set. The data set has 3924 observations. Partitioning seems to work for small subsets of the data, but when I use the entire data set, no partitioning occurs. The variables are: RESP respondent to a survey (0 = not a respondent, 1 = respondent) AGE_P Age (continuous) ORIGIN_I Hispanic Ethnicity (1 = Hispanic, 2 = non-Hispanic) RACRECI2 Race

This has been an idea floating around in my head for a while and after several discussions with others it continues to hold up so I thought I would mail it out. Sorry for cross posting to both lists, but this is an issue that would significantly impact both LLVM and Clang. Essentially, LLVM provides canned optimization "levels" for frontends to re-use. This is nothing new. However, we

On 4/20/2018 7:06 PM, Jessica Paquette via llvm-dev wrote: > We perform regular testing to ensure the outliner produces correct > AArch64 code at -Oz. Tests include the LLVM test suite and standard > external test suites such as SPEC. All tests compile and > execute. We've also been making sure that the outliner produces > debuggable code. Users are still guaranteed to have

> On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:22 AM, escha <escha at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 20, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 20, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Steve King <steve at metrokings.com <mailto:steve at metrokings.com>> wrote: >>>

Hi Joan, On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 18:01, Joan Lluch <joan.lluch at icloud.com> wrote: > After looking at it a bit further, I think this is a Clang thing. Clang issues “align 2” if the struct has at least one int (2 bytes), but also if the entire struct size is multiple of 2. For example a struct with 4 char members. In these cases the LLVM backend correctly creates word sized load/stores

Here is something I wrote years ago. I expect you can adjust it for your needs # cat remove_blank_vmail #!/bin/bash # remove_blank_vmail takes arguments as voicemail boxes and removes messages with audio files shorter then MINSIZE (in bytes) #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Description: # Author: John Harragin Monroe-Woodbury CSD # Created at: Thu Nov 6