similar to: Wrong function when import from module using get

On 6/20/16 3:46 PM, Yuxi Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > But I still don't know how a transform pass updates a new analysis > pass after it modifies the IR. Can you explain it clearly? I am not > familiar with pass management and invocation. Passes can have methods that allow their internal state to be updated by other passes (the same way that their state

I''m working on a legacy product and introducing prototype to make my life a little easier and I''m running into some problems with the properties being added to some built in objects like Array. The product has a form validator that''s used all over that adds fields (and some of the fields properties) that need to be checked to an array called fields (edited for

1. I got the tools to build. Yay! 2. I got past all the annoying trouble with not finding header files. Yay! Now I'm having problems with this: llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: <invalid>: path is not valid I'm investigating this with the debugger and so far I've learned that

On Sat, 6 May 2006, Greg Pettyjohn wrote: > Now I'm having problems with this: > > llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> > C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: <invalid>: path is not valid > I've tracked this down in the debugger. It is indeed a bug. The problem is that Path::isValid() will reject a string

Greg, Looks like Jeff Cohen already fixed this in CVS. Please update and give it another shot. Thanks, Reid. On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 16:43 -0400, Greg Pettyjohn wrote: > > On Sat, 6 May 2006, Greg Pettyjohn wrote: > > > Now I'm having problems with this: > > > > llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> > >

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 6 May 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: >> Looks like Jeff Cohen already fixed this in CVS. Please update and give >> it another shot. > > Is this fixing the issue, or just papering over it? Why are we trying > to load an archive member without a path set? We're not. It's just a sentry value. > > -Chris > >> On Sat,

> I'm asking for people (especially those running nightly testers) to give > Dejagnu a try. I will do. But last 2 days (after http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/020279.html ) LLVM broken at FreeBSD: In file included from Path.cpp:27: platform/Path.cpp:26: error: no `bool llvm::sys::Path::isvalid() const' member function declared in class

I finally got a clean compile and link for wxRuby. Now I''m down to deciphering runtime errors. Once again, I''m going to pick up on this tomorrow, but I thought I''d post my console output tonight to see if anyone has any thoughts before I tackle this tomorrow. I''m running the same app "minimal.rb" E:\Dev\RubyDev\wxruby\samples\minimal>ruby

Hi, I think the Win32/Path.cpp - especially method isValid has a bug: ----------------- ... // A file or directory name may not end in a period. if (path[len-1] == '.') return false; if (len >= 2 && path[len-2] == '.' && path[len-1] == '/') return false; ... ----------------- This is valid on windows cmd prompt: 'dir \.' (root dir)

On Sat, 6 May 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > Looks like Jeff Cohen already fixed this in CVS. Please update and give > it another shot. Is this fixing the issue, or just papering over it? Why are we trying to load an archive member without a path set? -Chris > On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 16:43 -0400, Greg Pettyjohn wrote: >> >> On Sat, 6 May 2006, Greg Pettyjohn wrote: >>

Hi I am tryng to mirror a locked away, secure web service for testing purposes and am almost there. Hoever as part of the definition for the structure of the call to the webservice, I have this struct. class MyCall < ActionWebService::Struct member :username, :string member :password, :string member :"remote-ip", :string end However this does not work... Should

On Sat, 6 May 2006, Jeff Cohen wrote: >>> Looks like Jeff Cohen already fixed this in CVS. Please update and give >>> it another shot. >> >> Is this fixing the issue, or just papering over it? Why are we trying to >> load an archive member without a path set? > We're not. It's just a sentry value. Then why does it matter whether the path is

Hi, I would like this patch for Path.inc to be accepted. I cannot tell, why the win32 version of isValid() method fails when issuing a correct path on the mingw platform. This is especially annoying when configuring the cfrontend, because we get this misindicating error: 'checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.' And it has

Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:

The code in collectRanges() does: // Collect ranges for register units. These live ranges are computed on // demand, so just skip any that haven't been computed yet. if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { for (MCRegUnitIterator Units(Reg, &TRI); Units.isValid(); ++Units) if (LiveInterval *LI = LIS.getCachedRegUnit(*Units))

Hi, A bit of explanation of what I''m trying to achieve : We have a bunch of homogeneous nodes that have CPU + RAM + Storage and we want to use that as some generic cluster. The idea is to have Xen on all of these and run Ceph OSD in a domU on each to "export" the local storage space to the entire cluster. And then use RBD to store / access VM images from any of the machines.

On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 00:16, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > > I'm asking for people (especially those running nightly testers) to give > > Dejagnu a try. > > I will do. > > But last 2 days (after > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/020279.html ) > LLVM broken at FreeBSD: > > In file included from Path.cpp:27: >

Hi First off, I apologise if this is covered somewhere and I just don''t get it... I''ve looked far and wide .... As a part of my current project I need to hook up to a particular XMLRPC webservice that won''t be available for me to use until close to launch date... So I am trying to recreate the webservice that mirrors the live one so I can test my application

On Aug 30, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <arnolds at codeaurora.org> wrote: > The code in collectRanges() does: > > // Collect ranges for register units. These live ranges are computed on > // demand, so just skip any that haven't been computed yet. > if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { > for (MCRegUnitIterator Units(Reg,

Lang, I think I am getting closer to understanding this. The findLastUseBefore() should probably look something like this: // Return the last use of reg between NewIdx and OldIdx. SlotIndex findLastUseBefore(unsigned Reg, SlotIndex OldIdx) { SlotIndex LastUse = NewIdx; if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { for (MCRegUnitRootIterator Roots(Reg,