Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Changing Color of Selected Column Names in Corrplot"
2018 Mar 17
0
length of 'dimnames' [2] not equal to array extent- For Correlation Plot
That does clarify for me that you're missing a step: I didn't clearly
follow your description at first.
corrplot expects a correlation matrix, not your original data. You need to
use cor() first.
That's pretty clear in the documentation. See for instance the examples:
data(mtcars)
M <- cor(mtcars)
corrplot(M)
Sarah
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 12:00 PM Shivi Bhatia <shivipmp82 at
2018 Mar 17
3
length of 'dimnames' [2] not equal to array extent- For Correlation Plot
Hi Sarah,
Thank you for your help.
I tried using CR1<-as.matrix(CR1) but gives error Error in corrplot(CR1,
method = "circle") : The matrix is not in [-1, 1]!. I am using a corrplot
library.
Please find the reproducible example:
dput(head(CR1,10))
structure(c(26L, 46L, 39L, 38L, 47L, 59L, 56L, 61L, 43L, 60L,
78L, 63L, 2L, 58L, 8L, 1L, 1L, 9L, 11L, 2L, 1037500L, 46747L,
346300L,
2007 Oct 01
4
how to plot a graph with different pch
I am trying to plot a graph but the points on the graph should be
different symbols and colors. It should represent what is in the legend.
I tried using the points command but this does not work. Is there
another command in R that would allow me to use different symbols and
colors for the points?
Thank you kindly.
data(mtcars)
plot(mtcars$wt,mtcars$mpg,xlab= "Weight(lbs/1000)",
2020 Apr 16
2
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
I'm sure this exists elsewhere, but, as a trade-off, could you achieve
what you want with a separate helper function F(expr) that constructs
the function you want to pass to [lsv]apply()? Something that would
allow you to write:
sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), F(summary(lm(mpg ~ wt,.))$r.squared))
Such an F() function would apply elsewhere too.
/Henrik
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM
2013 Apr 12
3
Why copying columns of a data.frame becomes numeric?
Dear list,
I want the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 6th columns of mtcars. After copying them,
the columns become numeric class rather than data frame.
But, when I copy rows, they data frame retains its class. Why is this? I
don't see why copying rows vs columns is so different.
> class(mtcars)
[1] "data.frame"
> head(mtcars)
mpg cyl disp hp drat wt qsec vs
2020 Apr 16
6
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Hi,
I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of
FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to
allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to
surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred
as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call
2017 Mar 26
1
Documentation of model.frame() and get_all_vars()
Hi everyone,
This is about documentation for the model.frame() page. The
get_all_vars() function (added in R 2.5.0) is a great addition, but
the behavior of its '...' argument is different from that of
model.frame() with which it is documented and this creates ambiguity.
The current docs read:
\item{\dots}{further arguments such as \code{data}, \code{na.action},
\code{subset}. Any
2017 Jun 01
3
odfWeave - A loop of the "same" data
Before I go and do this another way - can I check if anyone has a way of looping through data in odfWeave (or possibly sweave) to do a repeating analysis on subsets of data?
For simplicity lets use mtcars dataset in R to explain. Dataset looks like this:
> mtcars
mpg cyl disp hp drat wt ...
Mazda RX4 21.0 6 160 110 3.90 2.62 ...
Mazda RX4 Wag 21.0 6 160 110 3.90
2012 Nov 04
1
Apply same linear model to subset of dataframe
I have applied the same linear model to several different subsets of a
dataset. I recently read that in R, code should never be repeated. I feel my
code as it currently stands has a lot of repetition, which could be
condensed into fewer lines. I will use the mtcars dataset to replicate what
I have done. My question is: how can I use fewer lines of code (for example
using a for loop, a function or
2020 Apr 16
2
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Simon,
Thanks for replying. In what follows I won't try to argue (I understood
that you find this a bad idea) but I would like to make clearer some of
your point for me (and may be for others).
Le 16/04/2020 ? 16:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?:
> Serguei,
>> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr>
>> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a
2010 Nov 30
3
pca analysis: extract rotated scores?
Dear all
I'm unable to find an example of extracting the rotated scores of a
principal components analysis. I can do this easily for the un-rotated
version.
data(mtcars)
.PC <- princomp(~am+carb+cyl+disp+drat+gear+hp+mpg, cor=TRUE, data=mtcars)
unclass(loadings(.PC)) # component loadings
summary(.PC) # proportions of variance
mtcars$PC1 <- .PC$scores[,1] # extract un-rotated scores of
2010 Jun 18
1
ggplot2 boxplot: horizontal, univariate
In ggplot2, I would like to make a boxplot that has the following properties:
(1) Contrary to default, the meaningful axis should be the horizontal axis.
Lattice does this, for instance, by
library(lattice);bwplot(~mtcars$mpg)
(2) It is *univariate*, i.e., of a single vector, say mtcars$mpg. I do not wish to make separate plots for the different values of mtcars$cyl.
(3) Nothing on the
2020 Apr 17
2
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Thanks Simon,
Now, I see better your argument.
Le 16/04/2020 ? 22:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?:
> ... I'm not arguing against the principle, I'm arguing about your
> particular proposal as it is inconsistent and not general.
This sounds promising for me. May be in a (new?) future, R core will
come with a correct proposal for this principle?
Meanwhile, to avoid substitute(),
2009 Aug 16
2
bootstrapped correlation confint lower than -1 ?
Dear R users,
Does the results below make any sense? Can the the interval of the
correlation coefficient be between *-1.0185* and -0.8265 at 95%
confidence level?
Liviu
> library(boot)
> data(mtcars)
> with(mtcars, cor.test(mpg, wt, met="spearman"))
Spearman's rank correlation rho
data: mpg and wt
S = 10292, p-value = 1.488e-11
alternative hypothesis: true rho is not
2017 May 09
3
R-3.3.3/R-3.4.0 change in sys.call(sys.parent())
Some formula methods for S3 generic functions use the idiom
returnValue$call <- sys.call(sys.parent())
to show how to recreate the returned object or to use as a label on a
plot. It is often followed by
returnValue$call[[1]] <- quote(myName)
E.g., I see it in packages "latticeExtra" and "leaps", and I suspect it
used in "lattice" as well.
This idiom
2017 May 11
1
R-3.3.3/R-3.4.0 change in sys.call(sys.parent())
Here is a case where the current scheme fails:
> with(datasets::mtcars, xyplot(mpg~wt|gear)$call)
xyplot(substitute(expr), data, enclos = parent.frame())
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:36 AM, William Dunlap via R-devel
> <r-devel at
2017 Jun 01
0
odfWeave - A loop of the "same" data
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, POLWART, Calum (COUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) via R-help wrote:
> Before I go and do this another way - can I check if anyone has a way of
> looping through data in odfWeave (or possibly sweave) to do a repeating
> analysis on subsets of data?
>
> For simplicity lets use mtcars dataset in R to explain. Dataset looks like this:
>
2006 Sep 03
2
lm, weights and ...
> lm2 <- function(...) lm(...)
> lm2(mpg ~ wt, data=mtcars)
Call:
lm(formula = ..1, data = ..2)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) wt
37.285 -5.344
> lm2(mpg ~ wt, weights=cyl, data=mtcars)
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : ..2 used in an incorrect context,
no ... to look in
Can anyone explain why this is happening? (Obviously this is a
manufactured example, but it
2017 Aug 16
1
Bias-corrected percentile confidence intervals
Hi folks,
I'm trying to estimate bias-corrected percentile (BCP) confidence
intervals on a vector from a simple for loop used for resampling. I am
attempting to follow steps in Manly, B. 1998. Randomization, bootstrap
and monte carlo methods in biology. 2nd edition., p. 48. PDF of the
approach/steps should be available here:
https://wyocoopunit.box.com/s/9vm4vgmbx5h7um809bvg6u7wr392v6i9
If
2020 Apr 20
1
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Le 19/04/2020 ? 20:46, Gabor Grothendieck a ?crit?:
> You can get pretty close to that already using fn$ in the gsubfn package:
>> library(gsubfn) fn$sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), x ~
>> summary(lm(mpg ~ wt, x))$r.squared)
> 4 6 8 0.5086326 0.4645102 0.4229655
Right, I thought about similar syntax but this implementation has
similar flaws pointed by Simon, i.e. it reduces