similar to: Memory leak in nleqslv()

Hi Sacha, On second thought, perhaps this is more the direction that you want ... X2 = cbind(X_train,y_train) colnames(X2)[3] = "y" regr2<-randomForest(y~x1+x2, data=X2,maxnodes=10, ntree=10) regr regr2 #Make prediction predictions= predict(regr, X_test) predictions2= predict(regr2, X_test) HTH, Eric On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:40?AM Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com>

In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44486643/nleqslv-memory-use-in-r Andrew Leach has raised a question about the memory usage of my package nleqslv. In a model with a loop within a function he has experienced continuously increasing memory usage by package nleqslv

Dear R-users, I use the "nleqslv" function to get parameter estimates by solving a system of non-linear equations. But I also need standard error for each of estimates. I checked the nleqslv manual but it didn't mention about SE. Is there any way to get the SE for each estimate? Thank you very much. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, This is really more a stats question than a R one, but.... Does anyone have any familiarity with using the mean prediction squared error scaled by the variance of the response, as a 'scale free' criterion for evaluating different regression algorithms. E.g. Generate X_train, Y_train, X_test, Y_test from true f. X_test/Y_test are generated without noise, maybe? Use X_train, Y_train

Dear R-experts, Here below a toy example with some error messages, especially at the end of the code (Tuning the parameters). Your help to correct my R code would be highly appreciated. ####################################### #libraries library(lattice) library(ggplot2) library(caret) library(randomForest) ?? #Data

Just to set things straight: The error message "Error in nleqslv(xstart, fun) : Length of fn result <> length of x!" is issued by the underlying nleqslv C function. <fn> refers to the second argument of function nleqslv which is named fn. It is not issued by R itself. Other have already pointed out how to resolve the error. Berend Hasselman

I'm solving 4 complex equations simultaneously. Code is below. The code returns only zero's for the solution though there should also be a non-zero result. I'm pretty confident that the equations are correct because they are straight from a published paper and I checked them pretty thoroughly. The parameter values I used are from the published paper as well. Any suggestions for how

Thanks. This should be resolved in R-devel(r72788) and R-patched (r72789) Best, luke On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Berend Hasselman wrote: > > > In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html > and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44486643/nleqslv-memory-use-in-r > > Andrew Leach has raised a question

Santi, In the second line of your function you have the following: f <- numeric(length(x)) This sets the length of this numeric vector (i.e., "f") to the length of the vector "x". Later, inside the function you assign to values to 4 elements of the vector "f". This assumes that "f" is at least 4 element in length. However, you define

Dear all, I am relatively new to R and have had some difficulty in understanding an error i get when running a code to solve a system of non-linear equations, with four equations and two variables. This is my code: ALPHA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4) BETA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4) GAMMA <- c(0.3940672148378, 0.1, 0.15,

Dear List Members,I am trying to set up a large system of equations and I am trying to find a simple way to set up the list command under the package system fit. Here is the example from system fit and what I am trying to do: EQ1 <- Y1 ~ X1 + X2 + X4EQ2 <- Y2 ~ X2 + X3EQ3 <- Y3 ~ X2 + X3 + X4EQ4 <- Y4 ~ X1 + X3 + X4eqSystem <-list(form1 = EQ1, form2 = EQ2, form3 = EQ3, form4 = EQ4)

Is there a way to apply paste to?list(form1 = EQ1, form2 = EQ2, form3 = EQ3, form4 = EQ4)?such that I don't have to write form1=EQ1 for all my models?(I might have a list of 20 or more)? I also need the EQs to read the formulas associated with them. For example, below, I was able to automate the name assignment but I could not figure out how to?to set up the list using?paste or other

Dear list members, Is there a package somewhere for jointly estimating two poisson processes? I think the closest I've come is using the "SUR" option in the Zelig package (see below), but when I try the "poisson" option instead of the "SUR" optioin I get an error (error given below, and indeed, reading the documentation of the Zelig package, I get the impression

Hello to everyone, I have 2 problems and would be very pleased if anyone can help me: 1) When I use the package "systemfit" for SUR regressions, I get two different variance-covariance matrices when I firstly do the SUR regression ("The covariance matrix of the residuals used for estimation") and secondly do the OLS regressions. In the manual for "systemfit" on page

Hi  I want to fit two equations simultaneously EQ1<-Y1~X1+X2 EQ2<-Y2~X1+X2 eqsystem<-list(Y1HAT=EQ1,Y2HAT=EQ2) fitols<-systemfit(eqsystem, method="OLS", data=BB) How do I get coefficients for the first equation? R code How do I restrict coefficient of X2 in the first equation (say , restrict it to less than  zero). R code Your help is appreciated. Dereje [[alternative

I found this link the other day, re: how to stub out Net::HTTP::get and just about flipped it was so cool: http://habtm.com/articles/2006/01/12/mocking-net-http-get. This is exactly what I needed and allowed me to right even more happy model tests. I made an http.rb in my test/mocks/test directory and added the suggested require line in my model_test.rb file. Now, he didn''t give

Hi guys I have been using R for a few months now and have come across an error that I have been trying to fix for a week or so now.I am trying to build a classifer that will classify the wine dataset using Naive Bayes. My code is as follows library (e1071) wine<- read.csv("C:\\Rproject\\Wine\\wine.csv") split<-sample(nrow(wine), floor(nrow(wine) * 0.5)) wine_training <-

Hello, I want to solve a nonlinear 3SLS problem with "nlsystemfit()". The equations are of the form y_it = f_i(x,t,theta) The functions f_i(.) have to be formulated as R-functions. When invoking "nlsystemfit()" I get the error Error in deriv.formula(eqns[[i]], names(parmnames)) : Function 'f1' is not in the derivatives table

Hi everybody, I'm a newbye with lots of problems :). I'm trying to use nlsystemfit, but I recieve two error messages whose origin that I don't understand. 1) When I try to reproduce the example reported in the systemfit package manual, that is library( systemfit ) data( ppine ) hg.formula <- hg ~ exp( h0 + h1*log(tht) + h2*tht^2 + h3*elev + h4*cr) dg.formula <- dg ~ exp( d0

Dear all, I initially ran into this problem while rebuilding a package dependent on nleqslv. I got the following error: Error in match.arg(global) : 'arg' must be of length 1 This didn't occur in previous versions of nleqslv, but did in the current one (2.4). I think I pinned the problem down to the following example: Take two functions: test <-