similar to: Error in `[[<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, alt.name, value = integer(0)) with mlogit

Hello, There's a typo in your call to mlogit.data, it should be alt.var="nbChev", not alt.var="noChev". Then the error is different. You should check the call arguments to see if they make sense. Hope this helps, Rui Barradas Em 28-07-2017 13:14, sandoz at free.fr escreveu: > I re post my question with the csv problem fixed. > > Can someone explain the

I don't know either. Perhaps someone else on the list who uses that _contributed_ package will know. Please be aware that it is both possible and preferred that you make reproducible examples so others can troubleshoot. See any of [1][2][3] [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example [2] http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html [3]

Looks like you need to pay attention to how you read in your data. In general, you should always execute one statement at a time until you know your script is working. All the errors after the first one are unhelpful to you or us. If you actually pay attention to what is in your horse.data data frame after you have read it in, the columns did not get separated out. The "csv" in in

Hello, Inline. Em 27-07-2017 20:36, peter dalgaard escreveu: > >> On 27 Jul 2017, at 18:03 , Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: >> >> Looks like you need to pay attention to how you read in your data. In general, you should always execute one statement at a time until you know your script is working. All the errors after the first one are unhelpful

Hi, Please help about the error I am getting after the h1.dat<- line : this line worked with much more independant variables and bigger data. This time I want to work with just 2 variables cteD & cteTh. What is wrong ? > setwd("C:/Rstudio/Trot") > library(mlogit) > horse1.data<-read.csv("cte2.csv") >

> On 27 Jul 2017, at 18:03 , Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > Looks like you need to pay attention to how you read in your data. In general, you should always execute one statement at a time until you know your script is working. All the errors after the first one are unhelpful to you or us. > > If you actually pay attention to what is in your

Hi, Can someone explain this error below, I don't understand why the 2 int columns are associated to make a row name > horse1.data<-read.csv("cte2.csv", header=TRUE, sep=";") > h1.dat<-mlogit.data(data=horse1.data,choice="win",chid.var="raceid",alt.var="nbChev",shape="long") Error in `row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`,

Hi I did not notice any answer to your question so I try. After studying docs and other responses to similar question I deduct that chid.var and alt.var are mixed together and new data frame is being build with chid.var and alt.var combination as new row names. As the combination is not unique this operation results to error. But I may be completely wrong. Cheers Petr > -----Original

To back up Ber's please have a look at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example and/or http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html John Kane Kingston ON Canada > -----Original Message----- > From: jose.ferraro at logiteng.com > Sent: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:18:35 +0000 > To: cdesjard at umn.edu > Subject: Re: [R] reduced set of

I am learning five mlogits as follows v1.model<-mlogit(v1~1|v2+v3+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v1.data, reflevel="1") v2.model<-mlogit(v2~1|v1+v3+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v2.data, reflevel="1") v3.model<-mlogit(v3~1|v1+v2+v4+v5, data=mlogit.v3.data, reflevel="1") v4.model<-mlogit(v4~1|v1+v2+v3+v5, data=mlogit.v4.data, reflevel="1")

I am trying to follow this example for multinomial logistic regression http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/mlogit.htm However, I cannot get it to work properly. This is the output I get, and I get an error when I try to use the mlogit function. Any ideas as to why this happens? > mydata <- read.csv(url("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/mlogit.csv")) > attach(mydata) >

Hello: Has anyone tried to model-based recursive partition (using mob from package party; thanks Achim and colleagues) a data set based on a multinomial logit model (using mlogit from package mlogit; thanks Yves)? I attempted to do so, but there are at least two reasons why I could not. First, in mob I am not quite sure that a model of class StatModel exists for mlogit models. Second, as

I've been working on a multinomial logit model, trying to predict vegetation types as a function of total phosphorus. Previous responses to my postings have pointed me to the mlogit package. I'm now trying to work examples and my data using this package. data("Fishing", package = "mlogit") Fish <- mlogit.data(Fishing, varying = c(4:11), shape = "wide",

I am new to R but I have managed to use mlogit to run multivariate logit models successfully. My data violates the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives assumption and now I would like to run a mixed logit model. It is a "wide" data set with 9 independent (individual) variables and three choices (variable Y). The database is in a cvs file called CAU. This is the code I have run

Hi: When I call str() on an mlogit object, I seem to get warnings. This code is from an example provided in the mlogit documentation: library(mlogit) data("Train", package="mlogit") tr<-mlogit.data(Train, shape="wide", choice="choice", varying=4:11, sep="", alt.levels=c(1,2), id="id")

Hello, I've been getting the following error when using the mlogit function from the mlogit package This is one of the examples provided in the Package "mlogit" January 27, 2010 description data("Fishing", package="mlogit") Fish <- mlogit.data(Fishing, varying = c(4:11), shape="wide", choice="mode") summary(mlogit(mode ~ pr + ca - 1,

Hello, I'm trying to run a mlogit regression on my data, and have been unsuccessful so far. The data I am working with consist of many observations of how people react when given a certain number. I have just 2 data points per observation: a number (there are ~300 different possible numbers) and then a reaction (either 0, 1, or 2). The reactions are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. I am

Dear all, I am trying to run a mixed multinomial logit model in R since my response variable has 4 non-ordinal categories. I am using the package mlogit that estimates the parameters by maximum likelihood methods. First of all, I prepared my data using the mlogit.data command. In the mlogit command, one can introduce alternative-specific (fixed factors??) and individual-specific (random

Hello, I can't figure out why using and not using weights in mlogit yields identical results. My motivation is for the case when an "observation" or "individual" represents a number of individuals. For example, library(mlogit) library(AER) data("TravelMode", package = "AER") TM <- mlogit.data(TravelMode, choice = "choice", shape =

Dear all, ? I am implementing a stochastic utility model that will eventually make use of multinomial logit. I found that there is a package in R called mlogit. I am not sure whether I have already found the correct package or software. May I ask am I correct? ? Basically, let's say ? I have observations of n outcomes, for each outcome 1<=i<=n, they were selected by a choice from a set