similar to: chi-square distribution table

Hi, How do we get the value of a chi square as we usually look up on the table on our text book? i.e. Chi-square(0.01, df=8), the text book table gives 20.090 > dchisq(0.01, df=8) [1] 1.036471e-08 > pchisq(0.01, df=8) [1] 2.593772e-11 > qchisq(0.01, df=8) [1] 1.646497 > nono of them give me 20.090 Thanks, cruz

Dear Rs: outer(1:3, 1:3, function(df1, df2) qf(0.95, df1, df2)) I compare this F distribution results with the table, the answers were perfect. But I need to see for chi-sqaured distribution. When I employed the similar formula outer(1:3, 1:3, function(df1, df2) qchisq(0.95, df1, df2)) , I am getting unexpected results. I need to see the following values: p=0.750 ..... 1 1.323

Full_Name: Jerry W. Lewis Version: 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Professional Submission from: (NULL) (24.147.191.250) pchisq(0,0,ncp=lambda) returns 0 instead of exp(-lambda/2) pchisq(x,0,ncp=lambda) returns NaN instead of exp(-lambda/2)*(1 + SUM_{r=0}^infty ((lambda/2)^r / r!) pchisq(x, df + 2r)) qchisq(.7,0,ncp=1) returns 1.712252 instead of 0.701297103 qchisq(exp(-1/2),0,ncp=1) returns 1.238938

Hi, the chisq value for .05 level of signif. and 3 DF is 7.81 (one-sided). Is there a way to calculated it in R (giving level of signif. and DF)? Marco

Dear R helpers: Thanks for the previous reply. I am using Friedman racing test. According the the book "Pratical Nonprametric Statistic" by WJ Conover, after computing the statistics, he suggested to use chi-squared or F distribution to accept or reject null hypothesis. After looking into the source code, I found that R uses chi-sqaured distribution as below: PVAL <-

Hi there, How accurate is the aproximation R makes to the Chi-Square distribution? For example, if I run: > qchisq(1/1000000,6) [1] 0.03650857 how accurate is 0.0365 compared to the theoretical percentile? What kind of approximations have been made in the software's algorithm? It woudl be useful to know since I am working with tiny percentiles such as one one-millionth and one

Hi, I want to determine the confidence interval on the sum of two sigma's. Is there an easy way to do this in R? I guess I have to use some sort of chisquare convolution algorithm??? Thanx, Roy -- The information contained in this communication and any atta...{{dropped}}

Hi all, I would like to estimate power and necessary sample size for a GLM with a response variable that has a poisson distribution. Do you have any suggestions for how I can do this in R? Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Craig -- Craig A. Faulhaber Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences Utah State University 5230 Old Main Hill Logan, UT 84322 (435)797-3892

Full_Name: Viktor Witkovsky Version: 2.9.2 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (78.98.89.227) Hello, I have found strange behavior of the function qchisq (the non-central qchisq is based on inversion of pchisq, which is further based on pgamma). The function gives wrong results without any warning. For example: qchisq(1e-12,1,8.94^2,lower.tail=FALSE) gives 255.1840972465858 (notice that

Hi, I want to compute the quantiles of Chi^2 distributions with different degrees of freedom like x<-cbind(0.005, 0.010, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9, 0.95, 0.975, 0.99, 0.995) df<-rbind(1:100) m<-qchisq(x,df) and hoped to get back a length(df) times length(x) matrix with the quantiles. Since this does not work, I use x<-c(0.005, 0.010, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9, 0.95, 0.975,

Dear list I have a vector of values that allegedly have a chi-squared distribution. I want to create a plot that shows the values I have obtained, and the chi-squared distribution curve for the specified number of degrees of freedom to show what should have been obtained. At the moment I am plotting the values I have obtained as a histogram and somehow want to put on to this plot the

Craig, Thanks for your follow-up note on using the asypow package. My problem was not only constructing the "constraints" vector but, for my particular situation (Poisson regression, two groups, sample sizes of (1081,3180), I get very different results using asypow package compared to my other (home grown) approaches. library(asypow) pois.mean<-c(0.0065,0.0003) info.pois <-

Full_Name: David Clayton Version: 1.8.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (131.111.126.242) qchisq behaves very strangely when ncp is passed as zero (forcing internal qnchisq to be called) when first argument is small. Eg > qchisq(1-1e-6, 1, ncp=0, lower.tail=TRUE) qchisq(1-1e-6, 1, ncp=0, lower.tail=TRUE) [1] 1024 while, if ncp is unspecified, > qchisq(1-1e-6, 1) qchisq(1-1e-6, 1)

Full_Name: Drouilhet R?my Version: 1.8.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (195.221.43.136) qchisq(1,10) works well but qchisq(1,10,ncp=0) does not work whereas ncp=0 is the default value of the function qchisq(1,10). (of course, 10 will be replaced by any integer value). Let us notice that this bug occurs only when applying probability one. (qchisq(seq(0,.9,.1),10,ncp=0) works very well).

Hi all, I am having a trouble with this function I wrote ################################################### p26=function(x,alpha){ # dummy variable j=1 ci=matrix(ncol=2,nrow=3) while (j<4){ if (j==2) {x=x+c(-1,1)*0.5} ci[j,]= x+qnorm(1-alpha/2)^2/2+ c(-1,1)*qnorm(1-alpha/2)* sqrt(x+qnorm(1-alpha/2)^2/4) j=j+1 if (j==3) { # exact x=x-c(-1,1)*0.5

Hello, I want to use the quantile function so I read the doc but I don't understand with this > qchisq(seq(0.05,0.95,by=0.05),df=(length(don)-1)) [1] 62667.11 62795.62 62882.42 62951.47 63010.74 63064.00 63113.39 63160.27 63205.65 63250.33 63295.04 63340.48 63387.48 63437.03 63490.53 63550.14 63619.68 [18] 63707.24 63837.16 Can you help me please?

Hello all, Here's my query: Running R 1.6.2 on FreeBSD 5.0, and on WinXP, and I find that the following hangs the process: dchisq(alpha=0.01, df=1, ncp=295) but it does work for ncp < 294.92. Is this general? Best wishes to all, Andrew Andrew Robinson Ph: 208 885 7115 Department of Forest Resources Fa: 208 885 6226 University of Idaho E : andrewr at uidaho.edu PO

Greetings! I suspect that there is an error in the code for the function ci.pd() in the Epi package. This function is for computing confidence intervals for a difference of proportions between two independent groups of 0/1 responses, and implements the Newcombe ("Nc") method and the Agrasti-Caffo "AC" method. I think there is an error in the computation for the Newcombe

Hi, Attention chi-squared distribution, unlike F distribution, has only df1 as parameter, not df1 and df2. So correct into: outer(1:3, 1:3, function(df1, df2) qchisq(0.95, df1, df2)) outer(1:3, 1:3, function(df1, df2) qchisq(0.95, df1)) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Regards, Vito you wrote: Dear Rs: outer(1:3, 1:3, function(df1, df2) qf(0.95, df1, df2)) I compare this F

Dear R-help,   Chi Square Test for Goodness of Fit     Problem Faced :   I have got a discrete data as given below (R script)   No_of_Frauds <-c 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,2,2,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,4,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,5,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,3,2,1,1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,3,1,2,1,2,14,2,1,1,38,3,3,2,44,1,4,1,4,1,2,2,1,3)   I am trying to fit