similar to: Find maxima of a function

Please keep the list in cc. Sorry, it didn't work as expected. Maybe someone else have an appropriate solution. Best, Ulrik On Sa., 26. Aug. 2017, 12:57 niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for you mail, > I really appreciate your time on my problem > > I have posted this problem on > > >

Hi, Thanks for your mail, and time It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. case mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. 1134463,0.2074027) rv <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(486.4255, 53.24133), Norm(664.0713, 3.674773), Norm(669.0484, 4.101381),

Hello, I am facing a problem with optimization in R from 2-3 weeks. I have some Gaussian mixtures parameters and I want to find the maximum in that *Parameters are in the form * mean1 mean2 mean3 sigma1 sigma2 sigma3 c1 c2 c3 506.8644 672.8448 829.902 61.02859 9.149168 74.84682 0.1241933 0.6329082 0.2428986 I have used optima and optimx to find the

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Find maxima of a function To: "David Winsemius [via R]" <ml+s789695n4745009h56 at n4.nabble.com>, "Ismail SEZEN [via R]" <ml+s789695n4744993h60 at n4.nabble.com>, Ulrik Stervbo <ulrik.stervbo at gmail.com>

Dear Niharika, As I said before, the problem is basically an optimization issue. You should isolate the problematic part from the rest of your study. Sometimes, more information does not help to solution. All the answers from us (Ulrik, David, me) are more or less are correct to find a maximum point. Newton?s method is also correct. But after answers, you only say, it didn?t find the right

I have not followed the history of this thread, but I am quite flummoxed as to why the OP is rewriting code to estimate parameters from an univariate Gaussian mixture model when alternatives such as EMCluster (which generally appears to handle initialization better than MClust) exist. Or perhaps there is more to it in which case I apologize. But I thought that I would make the OP aware of the

> On 26 Aug 2017, at 16:39, niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your mail, and time > > It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. > > > case > > mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. > 1134463,0.2074027) > > rv

Hello I have a vector v=c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0.1134463,0.2074027) when i do sum(v) or 0.08844446+0.1744455+0.1379778+0.1209769+0.1573065+0.1134463+0.2074027 i am getting output as 1 But if i add them manually i get 1.00000026 I do not want to round of my value since it effect my code further Can anyone suggest how can i avoid this. Thanks & Regards Niharika

Hello, I have initial parameters for HMM model and I want to use depmixS4 package. The parameters are in the form intial_prob_matrix=matrix(c(0.07614213, 0.45177665, 0.47208122), nrow=1, ncol=3, byrow = TRUE) transition_matrix=matrix(c(0.46666667,0.46666667,0.06666667, 0.06741573,0.5617978,0.37078652, 0.02173913,0.3478261,0.63043478), nrow = 3, ncol =

Hello, I am trying to implement a formula aij= transition from state S_i to S_j/no of transition at state S_i Code I have written is working with three state {1,2,3 }, but if the number of states become={1,2,3,4,......n} then the code will not work, so can some help me with this. For and some rows of my data frame look like

On 2017-08-22 9:26 AM, niharika singhal wrote: > Hello I have a vector > v=c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0.1134463,0.2074027) > when i do > sum(v) > or > 0.08844446+0.1744455+0.1379778+0.1209769+0.1573065+0.1134463+0.2074027 > i am getting output as 1 No:? That's only the display: > sum(v)-1 [1] 1.6e-07 ????? hope this helps.? Spencer

... and following up on Spencer's answer, see the "digits" argument of ?options and ?print.default. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Spencer Graves <spencer.graves

Hi, I think you overthought this one a little bit, I don't know if this is the kind of code you are expecting but I came up with something like that: generate_transition_matrix <- function(data, n_states) { #To be sure I imagine you should check n_states is right at this point transitions <- matrix(0, n_states, n_states) #we could improve a little bit here because at

Hello, I need some help in plotting time series. I have dataframe Data with two column and thousands of row, I want wherever the sequence corresponding to Energy column is changed the color change should be reflected in Time Series plot, some rows of dataframe are below Energy sequence 13536 3 14335 3 14638 3 25363 3 18511 2 18371 2 14555 3 I am able

Hello, I have some parameters from Mclust function. The parameters are in the form *parametersDf * * mu_1 mu_2 var_mc1 var_mc2 c1 c2 * *2 1.357283 2.962736 0.466154 0.1320129 0.5258975 0.4741025 * *21 8.357283 9.962736 0.466154 0.1320129 0.5258975 0.4741025 * Each row in the above data frame

Chuck (Is it fine to call you Chuck?) has far more R jutsu than I do obviously. I don't know much about pmin and factor but it might worth looking into if you want to manipulate states by names (I assume this is why one might want to use it?) generate_transition_matrix <- function(data, states) prop.table(table(head(data, -1), tail(data, -1)), 1)[states,]

Dear all, I wonder which R algorithm could perform a search of local maxima in an spatial grid, in other words, having the coordinates of a map (x,y,z... up to 6 coordinates) and then the altitude/height at each point (h) (in total 7 numerical variables) I would like to localise the peaks (local maxima) of that topological surface. Which R algorithm can perform this? Thanks a lot, Josep Maria,

Hi there, I use the surf.gls() function to fit a variable measured over a surface. When I plot the predicted surface, there are local minima/maxima in almost every coordinate where data were measured, which seems aberrant. For instance: ?? x <- c(343,293,343,243,293,343,443,543,593,243,293,343,393,443,493,543,593,143,193,243,293,343,393,443,

Hi I have a large dataset which follows a multimodal distribution. And I would like to identify the maxima. As the data is obtained from a stochastic simulation, not all maxima in the data are "real maxima of the dirstribution" but rather small random fluctuations. Unfortunately, it is not possible for me to run more simulations to smooth the obtained distribution. What I am doing

?dv?z?lj?k az Egyperces olvas?inak t?bor?ban!