similar to: Interquartile Range

That didn't work Jim! Thanks anyway On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > At a guess, try this: > > iqr<-function(x) { > return(paste(round(quantile(x,0.25),0),round(quantile(x,0.75),0),sep="-") > } > > .col3_Range=iqr(datat$tenure) > > Jim > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at

> That didn't work Jim! It always helps to say how the suggestion did not work. Jim's function had a typo in it - was that the problem? Or did you not change the call to ddply to use that function. Here is something that might "work" for you: library(plyr) data <- data.frame(groupColumn=rep(1:5,1:5), col1=2^(0:14)) myIqr <- function(x) {

If you show us, not just tell us about, a self-contained example someone might show you a non-hacky way of getting the job done. (I don't see an argument to plyr::ddply called 'transform'.) Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Michael Artz <michaeleartz at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh thanks for that clarification Bert! Hope you enjoyed

Hi Michael, At a guess, try this: iqr<-function(x) { return(paste(round(quantile(x,0.25),0),round(quantile(x,0.75),0),sep="-") } .col3_Range=iqr(datat$tenure) Jim On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Michael Artz <michaeleartz at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to show an interquartile range while grouping values using > the function ddply(). So my function

Well, instead of your functions try: Mode <- function(x) { tabx <- table(x) tabx[which.max(tabx)] } and use R's IQR function instead of yours. ... so I still don't get why you want to return a character string instead of a value for the IQR; and the mode of a sample defined as above is generally a bad estimator of the mode of the distribution. To say more than that would

To be precise: paste(round(quantile(x,0.25),0),round(quantile(x,0.75),0),sep="-") is an expression that evaluates to a character string: "round(quantile(x,.25),0) - round(quantile(x,0.75),0)" no matter what the argument of your function, x. Hence return(paste(...)) will return this exact character string and never evaluates x. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The

Hi, Here is what I am doing notGroupedAll <- ddply(data ,~groupColumn ,summarise ,col1_mean=mean(col1) ,col2_mode=Mode(col2) #Function I wrote for getting the mode shown below ,col3_Range=myIqr(col3) ) groupedAll <- ddply(data ,~groupColumn ,summarise

HI that did not work for me either. The value I got returned from that function was "<rounded mean> - <rounded mean>" :(. thanks for the reply through On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:34 AM, William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> wrote: > > That didn't work Jim! > > It always helps to say how the suggestion did not work. Jim's > function had a typo

... and I'm getting another cup of coffee... -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > NO NO -- I am wrong! The paste() expression is

Again, IQR returns two both a .25 and a .75 value and it failed, which is why I didn't use it before. Also, the first function just returns tha same value repeating. Since they are the same, before the second call, using the mode function is just a way to grab one value. I could have used average, min, max, they all would have returned the same thing. Mike On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM,

Are you aware that there *already is* a function that does this? ?IQR (also your "function" iqr" is just a character string and would have to be parsed and evaluated to become a function. But this is a TERRIBLE way to do things in R as it completely circumvents R's central functional programming paradigm). Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind

Hi, Jumping into this thread mainly on the point of the mode of the distribution, while also supporting Bert's comments below on theory. If the vector 'x' that is being passed to this function is an integer vector, then a tabulation of the integers can yield a 'mode', presuming of course that there is only one unique mode. You may have to decide how you want to handle a

NO NO -- I am wrong! The paste() expression is of course evaluated. It's just that a character string is returned of the form "something - something". I apologize for the confusion. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County"

??? IQR returns a single number. > IQR(rnorm(10)) [1] 1.090168 To your 2nd response: "I could have used average, min, max, they all would have returned the same thing., " I can only respond: huh?? Are all your values identical? You really need to provide a small reproducible example as requested by the posting guide -- I certainly don't get it, and I'm done guessing.

Oh thanks for that clarification Bert! Hope you enjoyed your coffee! I ended up just using the transform argument in the ddply function. It worked and it repeated, then I called a mode function in another call to ddply that summarised. Kinda hacky but oh well! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > ... and I'm getting another cup of

Hi, I have two non-normal distributions and use interquartile ranges as a dispersion measure. Now I am looking for a test, which tests whether the interquartile ranges from the two distributions are significantly different. Any idea? Thanks, joerg [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am constructing a nomogram using cph and nomogram commands in Dr. Harrell's Design/RMS package. The HR that I obtain for dichotomous and categorical variables are identical to those that I obtain using STATA stcox. However, the inter-quartile HR I obtain for continuous variables is obviously different, since STATA gives me HR for each unit (year, centimeter, etc) like coxph would

Hi i am doing an environmental research The equation is as follow: gam(y1 ~ x1 + s(x2) + s(x3) + s(x4), family = gaussian, fit = true) I would like to obtain the beta coefficient and 95CI of x4 (or s(x4)), what should I do? Thanks, Lung -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/mgcv-beta-coefficient-and-95-CI-tp3320491p3320491.html Sent from the R help mailing list

Dear R-users For a given matrix of dimension, say (n,p), I'd like to extract for every column those elements that are bigger than twice the interquartile range of the corresponding column. Can I get these elements without using a loop? Thank you for your help Frank [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi, i'm using /"boxplot()"/ to show some data: x <- c(0.99, 0.97, 0.91, 0.72, 1.00, 0.99, 1.02, 0.90, 0.91, 0.90, 1.02, 0.90, 1.35, 1.01, 0.92) boxplot(x) is it correct when i say: /"Boxes represent interquartile ranges (IQRs); bold horizontal lines, medians; whiskers, lowest and highest values still within 1.5 x IQR; open circles, outliers."? /thanks in advance