similar to: what is the faster way to search for a pattern in a few million entries data frame ?

Hi Duncan, > Didn't you post the same question yesterday? Perhaps nobody answered > because your question is unanswerable. sorry, I got a email that my message was waiting for approval and when I look at the forum I didn't see my message and this is why I sent it again and this time I did check that the format of my message was text only. Sorry for the noise. > You need to

On 10/04/2016 2:03 PM, Fabien Tarrade wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a data frame DF with 40 millions strings and their frequency. I > am searching for strings with a given pattern and I am trying to speed > up this part of my code. I try many options but so far I am not > satisfied. I tried: > - grepl and subset are equivalent in term of processing time >

Hi Fabien, I was going to send this last night, but I thought it was too simple. Runs in about one millisecond. df<-data.frame(freq=runif(1000), strings=apply(matrix(sample(LETTERS,10000,TRUE),ncol=10), 1,paste,collapse="")) match.ind<-grep("DF",df$strings) match.ind [1] 2 11 91 133 169 444 547 605 734 943 Jim On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Fabien Tarrade

On 04/10/2016 03:27 PM, Fabien Tarrade wrote: > Hi Duncan, >> Didn't you post the same question yesterday? Perhaps nobody answered >> because your question is unanswerable. > sorry, I got a email that my message was waiting for approval and when I > look at the forum I didn't see my message and this is why I sent it > again and this time I did check that the

Hi there, I have a data frame DF with 40 millions strings and their frequency. I am searching for strings with a given pattern and I am trying to speed up this part of my code. I try many options but so far I am not satisfied. I tried: - grepl and subset are equivalent in term of processing time grepl(paste0("^",pattern),df$Strings) subset(df,

I do not follow you Gabriel. Package name must not use digit numbers. Tarbal will use them, taken from the DESCRIPTION file, version field. That's why I consider the weird case name you presented as irrelevant, and not to be considered. Le ven. 9 ao?t 2019 ? 20:41, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> a ?crit : > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:05 AM neonira Arinoem

LinkedIn ------------ J'aimerais vous inviter ? rejoindre mon r?seau professionnel en ligne, sur le site LinkedIn. Fabien Fabien Dupont Architecte Syst?me Unix/Linux chez CEA France Veuillez confirmer que vous connaissez Fabien Dupont?: https://www.linkedin.com/e/h24oga-h02h13s2-1w/isd/6381163954/lTfQQJ_9/?hs=false&tok=2oumAa6oXER581 -- Vous recevez des invitations ? vous connecter

Thanks to Fabien Luciole, there is now a French version of the Shorewall Setup Guide (http://shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide_fr.htm). Thanks Fabien!!! -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Back, After to get all informations i received, i put them in table as follow: see attachment file. Specialists can they tell me if they agree with my conclusions ? Thank's for your good job. Fabien. -- Fabien COMBERNOUS - IT Engineer eProcess - Parc Club du Millénaire Batiment n° 6 1025 rue Henri Becquerel - 34000 Montpellier FRANCE http://www.eprocess.fr - +33 (0)4 67 13 84 50

Won't it be better to have a convention that allows lowercase, dash, underscore and dot as only valid characters for new package names and keep the ancient format validation scheme for older package names? This could be implemented by a single function, taking a strictNaming_b_1 parameter which defaults to true. Easy to use, and compliance results will vary according to the parameter value,

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:43:59 +0100 Fabien Dupont <fdupont@redhat.com> wrote: > We can still find them and run the sysprep, but I have > the feeling that it would be more logical if virt-v2v did the sysprep when > target is oVirt / RHV. This is trickier than you think. For LVM volumes somebody (VDSM) has to lock and prepare the disks for you first and there is no external API to do

Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are really internal/local, this is decided by sending SMTP everytime something is sent, based on MX records). Problem is that Dovecot/Sieve is using wrong SMTP server (one used for receiving e-mails which should NEVER be used for sending [and

Op 28-1-2020 om 19:20 schreef azurit at pobox.sk: > Really no more info? You could do something with the sendmail_path or submission_host settings. Regards, Stephan. > > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be >> anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are

Lo, I'm wanting to set up a samba pdc with win2k stations. Actually when a when to add a station in the domaine i have configurer on my samba server i have this type of answer in client side :" immpossible to enter in this domaine becuase user or passwd is not correct". So but i have in smbd log : this in first : [2003/01/14 19:09:36, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(467)

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Fabien Dupont wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Fabien, sorry I didn't respond to this earlier as I was doing some > work. If you CC me on emails then you can usually get a quicker > response. > > > I've read the virt-v2v OpenStack output code

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:05 AM neonira Arinoem <neonira at gmail.com> wrote: > Won't it be better to have a convention that allows lowercase, dash, > underscore and dot as only valid characters for new package names and keep > the ancient format validation scheme for older package names? > Validation isn't the only thing we need to do wrt package names. we also need to

Hi, I've read the virt-v2v OpenStack output code to understand how it works and I've seen this: > (* The server name or UUID of the conversion appliance where > * virt-v2v is currently running. In future we may be able > * to make this optional and derive it from the OpenStack > * metadata service instead. > *) > server_id : string; Indeed, it can be

Hello, I sent the following message to the Debian folks. They don't think that the Debian packaging could be responsible for the issue described there. > Well, I'm not completely convinced that we will have very useful input > for you. I don't really see any reason for this to be caused by the > Debian packaging. To check this, why not compile samba from sources,

Hello, I got this problem: I want to mount a directory without providing a login/password [indicaf$]. I thought that "guest ok = yes" would be sufficient. But it not works. What option is the right one to open a share to everyone without a login box in windows ? Thanks. This is my smb.conf (samab v3.0.7): tccwebcom# more smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from

Hi, Is there a command or a tool usable to scan and establish a list of samba servers through different subnets ? I would like to propagate datas to them automatically without managing a list of sambva servers. thanks Fabien