similar to: Solution to communicating with UDP and other interfaces (under Linux) using R

Thanks for the advice I've received. FYI - It turns out that the problem was connected to the way R handles pipes and FIFOs, compared to the way the socat command does. (I don't know exactly what, but trying different things solved it!) I found that if you use FIFO() in R AND set up a FIFO connection in a terminal and then use SOCAT to communicate, it becomes reliable (at least for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm running stock FreeBSD with services running: samba (connections allowed only from local network), lpd (same), bind (all interfaces), apache (all), zope (local) This machine is home gateway/http/printserver. Recently some strange things happened as my printer all of sudden started to print stuff when nobody prints... luckily (or

Hello, Not strictly a CentOS question, but I hope someone can hint me in the right direction ... I have an incoming udp data stream to public interface that I want to duplicate and multipy to three or more destinations on the internal interface. Currently I've managed to put together netcat listener with output to pipe and socat reading from that pipe to a single destination. I hoped I

Yeah, this is a bit lengthy, but it's a vexing problem. First, I'm working on learning R, mainly by using it and coming more from a programming aspect (I have the books and have gone through them, but learn best by doing). I have multiple projects going where R is almost necessary. I learned C a few years ago, but am very rusty with it (and other languages back in the 70s). I also

Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or close enough. FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2. I have the domain provisioned as rfc2307 I have joined a Win7-virtual machine to the domain I have created a new user with ADUC I have assigned 10000 to

On 11/07/15 10:16, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 11/07/15 04:06, Lee Brown wrote: >> Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. >> >> Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar >> issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or >> close >> enough. >> >> FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2.

Recently we have been having a lot of trouble with time synchronisation between our samba DC and the domain clients. We are not sure what started this issue since the Samba domain went live on October 11, 2016 and the issues only began to surface this past January but at some point the time on the clients and the DC diverged enough that we began to get strange network errors. Once we figured out

hi, i've been running Exim & Dovecot together on the same box. Exim's been sharing Dovecot/SASL auth info over a local unix socket. works great. i'm now splitting Exim & Dovecot onto two different boxes. iiuc, Dovecot ONLY provides a UNIX (local) socket; *not* a TCP socket for over-the-network access. SUre, I could mount the Dovecot socket's volume over NFS ... but

>>> > Considering any editing/buffering benefits are only marginal (AFAIK) there are not benefits with the current approach.On the other hand the list of potential problems includes: > 1) We cannot use the ubiquitous EFI PXEbc protocol forcing us to rely on the (not always present) EFI Binding Services. > Best,Patrick Speaking utterly ignorantly here... could this switch help

Hello, I have successfully (hopefully) configured samba to run in Kubernetes pods, basically I have a pod (i.e. container) that run winbindd and join the Windows AD, and a pod (i.e. container) that run smbd. I have used socat to allow the unix socket communication between winbindd and smbd pods: *** winbindd pod *** UID??????? PID? PPID? C STIME TTY????????? TIME CMD root???????? 1???? 0? 0

Hi Everyone! I''m having problems to redirect an UDP port to an external server. My firewall have 4 interfaces: NET, LOC (192.168.0.0/24), DMZ(192.168.1.0/24), CMTC(10.0.0.0/24). On CMTC interface I have a direct connection to another network using a VPN link. I need to redirect an UDP port to on server (10.1.0.2) on CMTC zone using my local IP (192.168.0.1) for gateway. I will use

I?m trying to follow the instructions on the wiki to move from antispam to IMAPSieve, but it?s not working at all. A bit of a background: dovecot-core 2:2.3.8-4~buster dovecot-imapd 2:2.3.8-4~buster dovecot-lmtpd 2:2.3.8-4~buster dovecot-managesieved 2:2.3.8-4~buster dovecot-pgsql 2:2.3.8-4~buster dovecot-pop3d 2:2.3.8-4~buster

Hi Arnaud, On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Arnaud Quette wrote: > The technique is very general and is to send SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to the upsd daemon.? SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are events just like ONBATT and ONLINE. > The patch runs successfully on my opensuse 13.2 box, and solves my problem. In upssched.conf I now have declarations such as > > ? ?AT SIGUSR1 * CANCEL-TIMER

Hello, We upgraded one of our dovecot servers to debian stretch with dovecot 2.2.27 and since then one of our users has been experiencing random IMAP failures. We enabled raw logging at the server side and it shows normal IMAP commands/responses: 1507292522.222427 * 6 FETCH (FLAGS () BODYSTRUCTURE ("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL

I compiled the 3.0.21a samba software with the following configure options: configure --prefix=/opt/samba --exec-prefix=/opt/samba --with-krb=/usr/krb5 --with-smbwrapper --with-syslog --with-mandir=/usr/man --with-winbind Everything compiled fine; however, I am unable to see the server on the microsoft network. My smb.conf file looks like the this: [global] workgroup = CAREMARKRX

> Actually you are not correct. > > > 1st: I didn't quote the wikipedia article,? someone sent that as an > answer to my previous post. > > ?? (similar mindset probably, as in your response) > > 2: You are wrong,? broadcast packets, like for example DHCP, and also > WOL (if UDP), can be routed, by > > the means of ip helper addresses and directed broadcasts

We're copying a large number of 256MiB-files from one AIX-5.3 machine to anoter, using rsync-2.6.8 (with ssh). In the morning, the rsync process stopped to copy any more files (it is still hanging as I write this, and we can leave it alone for a couple of days). There is another machine in between that forwards all tcp packets to the target machine: SOURCE (rsync -z --rsh=ssh

Am I crazy for thinking about forwarding the DBUS session over an ssh connection much like the X session is forwarded? I've proven the concept with socat (to use the unix socket that dbus normally listens on rather than reconfiguring dbus to use a tcp socket) and it works just as expected. Any reason we wouldn't want openssh doing this natively? b.

daggs <daggs@gmx.com> writes: > I'd assume that saying vm running you mean that the os is up and > running too. I have similar need, I was able to get something as such > to work using virsh console when the guest was a linux with serial > console support enabled. I wasn't able to get this to work in a > script as I was never able to terminate the console seesion as

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.