similar to: Only 5 tests out of 376 currently failing!

Hi, I am writing some help about post formatting. I am using redcloth to format the text, and in a FAQ, also formatted with redcloth, I explain what to type to what to obtain. So, how could I escape ''*'', ''#'' & Co, to have an output like <redcloth> Type *word* to obtain <strong>word</strong> </redcloth> I tried "Type

Hi, all. I haven''t felt at liberty to go axing test cases, but some of the 33 that are failing now are ones I don''t think we want to pass? cruft coming from Markdown or made up to fill a gap some years ago. I''d like to float the proposition that we make Super (and thus RedCloth 4) behave as identically as possible to Textile2 as working on

New gems (source and win32): gem install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net Use it like: SuperRedCloth.new("_huh?_").to_html Okay, getting close! A lot more tests are passing. There are still about 50 tests failing. Most of these are due to ol/ul list problems. Here''s what''s still broken: * Options (:hard_breaks, :filter_html, etc.) *

For a community project I aim to combine RedCloth and Coderay and on doing this, I might have found an issue with RedCloth. I pushed a demo to Github: https://github.com/markusproske/redcloth_coderay_demo The index (http://localhost:3000/) demonstrates the issue. In brief: A page consist of textile. The textile contains @@@ruby somecode @@@ The textile is first feed into Coderay via a helper

I see that the well-defined order for transforming a page to HTML is: - Transform the content using the content converter ... - Replace tags I think it should be the other way around. I wrote this plugin that transform {flickr: <url of the photo>} into something like: <div> Foto, caption, etc. </div> Now, because of the order of transformations, the

> $ rake test > /usr/local/bin/ruby -Ilib:test "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ > rake-0.7.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/test_formatters.rb" > "test/test_parser.rb" > Loaded suite /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake/ > rake_test_loader > Started >

Hi, Thanks for all the help so far. I''ve almost got my site upgraded. A few more problems, which I''ll address in separate threads. So, I had <pre> tags in several places which contained code - yaml, ERB, etc. Previously, these were all ignored - passed through verbatim and not parsed by webgen. Now, they appear to be parsed. First, How should I do the equivalent of a

Hi Jason ! Hmmm, this is good and bad news: Good: ruby hooks means I could use a single pass to parse textile customizations in zena instead of running two parsers: nice. Bad: I have just switched to ragel for QueryBuilder to parse pseudo sql and I fear your shortcomings (if that''s an english phrase). Could you describe more precisely what you are missing with ragel ? I''m

Hey, and thanks for a great RedCloth! I have however stumbled upon a very weird bug. Have a look at this Textile file: https://gist.github.com/c75681ce99f8c2515ee6. I have two <notextile>-tags inside, but it still escapes single-quote to &#8216; in the first <notextile>-block, but not the last... Any reason why this would happen? //Magnus Holm -------------- next part

Hello nut-upsdev ! It's me again ! Since my last email about the new formalism for NUT configuration files, no objection was drawn. I propose then to make official this new formalism. Here can be find the grammar of the formalism : http://opensource.mgeups.com/projects/nut-config/grammar.od I made a parser for the new formalism and put sample files and a test program on my branch (JD-NewConf

Okay, update: gem install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net Or: http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/dist/superredcloth-1.160.tgz This one has better list, table and <notextile> support. I am close to releasing a SuperRedCloth on Rubyforge, so PLEASE! help me test this out by trying it on your personal wikis and blogs. Still to be done: * support for

1.) What is everyone''s preference on NCRs or character entities? Textile 2 uses decimal NCRs, so a less-than character becomes &#60; whereas RedCloth (3.04 and prior) used &lt;. What is your preference? It gets tough because &#39; (a straight single quote) doesn''t have a character entity equivalent. 2.) How do you feel about encoding characters like quotes