similar to: Polling is REALLY slow

I''ve been using backgroundrb since back in March 2007 or so. It''s been working mostly OK for me, but since the old version doesn''t seem to work out of the box with rails 2.0 for me, I decided to test out the latest version. So, I''m looking at the scheduling, and trying to figure out the best option for what I want to do. What I have is a set of workers that

I''ve got some workers that I want to have running all the time. Right now I''m just launching them manually, by requesting a special page in my rails app that includes lines like: MiddleMan.new_worker(:class=> :receiver, :job_key=>:r, :args=>{:sleep_time=>10}) This strikes me as a really weak way to fire up my workers. I basically want to automate things so

Wait loop can be interrupted by signal, so if signals are raised periodically (e.g. SIGALRM) this loop may never finish. Use emission time as a base for fence timeout. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 5 ++++- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c

I''m not sure how the numbering is supposed to work now that we''ve split everything out so I''m just going with the next number in the directory. This is a regression test for btrfs send, we had a problem where we''d try to send a file that had been deleted in the source snapshot. This is just to make sure we don''t have the same problem in the future.

Hi, Due to some performance issues, I want to use a custom query for a find method: def find_in_state(state) State.find :all, :limit => 10, :conditions => [''s.id = ? AND '' + ''s.id = c.state_id AND c.state_id = ? AND '' + ''c.id = col.county_id AND

This series depends on the previously posted reservation api patches. 2 of them are not yet in for-next-fences branch of git://git.linaro.org/people/sumit.semwal/linux-3.x.git The missing patches are still in my vmwgfx_wip branch at git://people.freedesktop.org/~mlankhorst/linux All ttm drivers are converted to the fence api, fence_lock is removed and rcu is used in its place. qxl is the first

Hi to all, I am mounting a simple cluster for use mail/virtualbox/samba in two servers, in active/active mode (not for virtualbox). In my testings some times the drbd system needs wait some time for start (sync protocols), or because some times the node are down many days. I create a script for wait for a sync, and check that the "ip of interconect cluster" are up an running. and go up

fence_is_signaled callback should support being run in atomic context, but not in irq context. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- include/linux/fence.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h index d174585b874b..c1a4519ba2f5 100644 ---

From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/event.c | 4 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 4 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++---------

I''m starting to play with Slantwise.com''s Fetcher to process emails via a Ruby script. Here''s the basic code lifted from their plugin: [code] class MailFetcherDaemon < Daemon::Base @config = YAML.load_file("#{RAILS_ROOT}/config/mail.yml") @config = @config[RAILS_ENV].to_options @sleep_time = @config.delete(:sleep_time) || 10 def self.start

This series applies on top of the driver-core-next branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git Before converting ttm to the new fence interface I had to fix some drivers to require a reservation before poking with fence_obj. After flipping the switch RCU becomes available instead, and the extra reservations can be dropped again. :-) I've done at least basic

On 2018?08?03? 12:04, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:43 AM Jason Wang<jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 2018?08?03? 11:24, Tonghao Zhang wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:07 AM Jason Wang<jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On 2018?08?03? 10:51, Tonghao Zhang wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 5:23 PM

Hi, I have made a patch which improves scp utility. It adds two new features: rate limit and resume support. With rate limit it's possible to limit transfer speed. Resume allows to continue file transfer where it was last interrupted. Also the progress meter was improved. Here is my patch, please send comments about it and what I can do better if there is something to fix. ---

Overall idea: Detect lockups by watching for timeouts (vm flush / fence), return -EIOs, handle them at ioctl level, reset the GPU and repeat last ioctl. GPU reset is done by doing suspend / resume cycle with few tweaks: - CPU-only bo eviction - ignoring vm flush / fence timeouts - shortening waits Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> ---

Hi Jason, On 3/18/19 3:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/3/15 ??8:41, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:50:11 +0800 >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Or something like I proposed several years ago? >>> https://do-db2.lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/25/169 >>> >>> Btw, for virtio-net, I think we actually

Hi Jason, On 3/18/19 3:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/3/15 ??8:41, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:50:11 +0800 >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Or something like I proposed several years ago? >>> https://do-db2.lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/25/169 >>> >>> Btw, for virtio-net, I think we actually

Hi gang, Thanks to other help I''ve gotten on this list, I''ve got backgroundrb up and running using postgres alongside my rails app. I''ve designed the system to have several eternally-running workers that periodically poll the database to see if there''s any work for them to do, and set things up in the config file to make them restart quickly if any of them

On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) >>> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I observed that there is one msix vector for