similar to: Active Directory Sites

Hello, Reading about, specifically in the wiki <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites> link, says the following about subnets. "Create a subnet entry for all subnets in your network and assign them to a site:" The subnet on which our DCs are configured is a public IP block, but the client machines are in a subnet with a private address block. Do I need to

Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to the closet > site to a DC Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/27/2018 11:44 AM, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Reading about, specifically in the wiki

We had a samba 4.1.9 AD DC running since July. We have 3 campuses and brought up a secondary AD at another campus. This setup seemed to be running as expected. We could see our primary AD DC authenticating requests fine. We could see the secondary AD authenticating requests as well at our second campus. Then we started experiencing bandwidth issues between our campuses. Our metro-etherlink

On 6/28/2018 9:20 AM, Elias Pereira wrote: > Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! > > For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to > the closet site to a DC > > > Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>> wrote: >

Hi, Existing Samba setup has no sites, two servers (one AD and one DC) are all in Default-First-Site-Name site. Inter-Site Transport: IP Site Link: DEFAULTIPSITELINK Sites: Default-First-Site-Name (already existing): Domain Controller(s): AD, HKDC Subnets: 192.168.1.0/24 SZOffice (new created): Domain Controller:

Greetings, I'm not sure what else to add. If you need more info please let me know. Any input is greatly appreciated. Eric On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 2:58?PM Eric <rvwbug at gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > This is my first attempt at multi-site with unique subnets (actually > first attempt at more than on DC). > > I had the existing "defaultFirstSite"

Hi all, Is there a command line to add DC to some site? The idea is to have a domain with several sites. If the whole AD database get corrupt I would restore some backup to recreate the first DC (the one with FSMO) then I'll join all others DC to that domain to force them to rebuild their database according to the one restored. Doing that I'll get all DC with the right DB but also in

hello folks, About ad sites, would work on an infrastructure as shown in the link image below? https://i.imgur.com/tYoxaYi.png The subnets (public IP) for communication is different on each others, of course. :D -- Elias Pereira

Am 09.01.2015 um 14:58 schrieb jacek burghardt: > Samba 4 functions at level of server 2008 as domain controller. Default forest and domain functional level is 2003 native during the provisioning. Supported is 2000 up to including 2008 R2. > I found it imposible to join samba 4 as secondary domain > controller to server 2012. Right. Samba doesn't support all features of the 2012

On 12/30/2014 10:55 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello David, > > Am 30.12.2014 um 00:26 schrieb David Bear: >> The big question is could the sites and services tool have triggered some >> bug in samba ? So much time has elapse I don't see that it is possible to >> go back and trouble shoot that way we should. >> >> I'm just wondering if there are any

Thanks for this answer. As I understood, for example if parameter bind interfaces only = yes is and interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped (in other words) ? Am I right ? And other thing. Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ? May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving broadcasts

In Samba/NT i was used to share mapping done in netlogon script, so users move around between sites, get home and profile from remote location but still have share mapped from local servers. In Samba/AD, using GPO, share mapping is in ''user policy'', and so user roam between sites and get different policies? I'm googling around but i'm a bit confused... i can still use

Hai Marco, > It is still true that 'samba-tool sites' is 'not recommended' and it i > better to manage sites and subnets with ADSS? Or that page have to/can > be updated? When i look at the page modify date, i say use the RSAT tools. I dont (hardly) use samba-tool here.. I do everything through RSAT tools. > Only a little note: You can target the ip range in the GPO

On 1/12/2015 10:47 PM, avinesh saini wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> > wrote: > >> Samba DCs > > Hi, > > Thank you for your responses. > In our setup samba version is 3.6. Can you please let me know if samba 3.6 > supports domain/forest functional levels or if there is any impact, when > samba acts as

ok =( Guess I should repeat all the work from scratch. So just to check if I got it right: 1) Create a new container. Provision a ad dc on it. Can I join some machine to apply some gpo's and to create users at this point? I'll delete it afterwards 2) Power down the container from 1) and use it as a template for every other dc I need just by changing ip/dns 3) Create another template for

Hello David, Am 30.12.2014 um 00:26 schrieb David Bear: > The big question is could the sites and services tool have triggered some > bug in samba ? So much time has elapse I don't see that it is possible to > go back and trouble shoot that way we should. > > I'm just wondering if there are any known issues with sites and services -- > or possible issues that could have

Hi list, I recently realized that using multiple DC has a major drawback when using Samba In my understanding, in a classical AD environment, sysvol share is supposed to be a DFS share. This means that proximity rules are applied when accessing to it. When using samba it seems that we face a classical round-robin DNS, which can lead to the situation where a machine on site A tries to fetch

Hello Pierre, Am 09.04.2015 um 10:27 schrieb BRIEC, Pierre: > The current samba3 domains doesn't have the same name, is it a > problem? Do you know when this functionnality will be implemented? It doesn't matter, because in my suggestion, one domain would die and you re-create all users in the other and join all machines to the new one. > I'm not really aware with AD

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add

On Thu, 17 May 2018 23:20:58 -0300 Elias Pereira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > hello folks, > > About ad sites, would work on an infrastructure as shown in the link > image below? > > https://i.imgur.com/tYoxaYi.png > > The subnets (public IP) for communication is different on each > others, of course. :D > Try reading this: