similar to: Clarification on the appropriate idmap settings for a standalone server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Clarification on the appropriate idmap settings for a standalone server"

2018 Dec 21
2
upg. CentOS 7.5 to 7.6: unable to mount smb shares - samba NT domain member using ldap
Originally I posted this question at CentOS forum 20.12.2018. https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=69193 Hi all, I am not able to mount samba shares after upgrading CentOS 7.5 to 7.6. I have been searching and trying to configure samba and winbind but no success. I find a lot of manuals and help pages about setting samba and winbind for machine acting as AD DC member but
2018 Dec 21
0
upg. CentOS 7.5 to 7.6: unable to mount smb shares - samba NT domain member using ldap
I am sorry logs are bad formatted I am trying again and hope it will be better. Otherwise lokk at link bellow or tell me how to send logs correctly. Mirek 21.12.2018 v 13:19 Miroslav Geisselreiter: > Originally I posted this question at CentOS forum 20.12.2018. > https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=69193 > > Hi all, > > I am not able to mount samba shares
2020 Jun 15
2
smb protocol version
I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers, how can I tell what the default protocols are? Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel? Chris On 6/15/2020 2:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote: >> I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the >> main host
2019 Sep 12
8
why windows 10 can't access centos samba
Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew
2021 Jul 15
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc1 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2021 Jul 15
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc1 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2021 Aug 09
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc2 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2021 Aug 09
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc2 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2021 Aug 26
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc3 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2021 Aug 26
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc3 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2014 Jul 16
1
Changing ownership of files on Windows (net rpc rights?)
Hello, I am unable to change ownership of Samba shares on Windows. It makes no difference if Samba is a PDC or if it is a member server in an Active Directory. I am running Samba 4.1.9 on FreeBSD 9.2 with ZFS. I can easily change ownership locally on the FreeBSD box, however, when trying to do it from Windows it errors out with access is denied. I've attempted to use net rpc rights grant
2008 Jun 20
2
SSL + compression?
OK, my interested is piqued now - does anyone have a recipe for how to make openssl compress the traffic before encrypting it? (Or perhaps it does by default?) Ed W
2012 Sep 25
1
appropriate test in glm when the family is Gamma
Dear R users, Which test is most appropriate in glm when the family is Gamma? In the help page of anova.glm, I found the following ?For models with known dispersion (e.g., binomial and Poisson fits) the chi-squared test is most appropriate, and for those with dispersion estimated by moments (e.g., gaussian, quasibinomial and quasipoisson fits) the F test is most appropriate.? My questions :
2009 May 14
0
fxruby 1.6.19 gem fails to find appropriate libpng library under Mac OS X 10.4.11
On May 11, 2009, at 6:07 PM, Ronald D. Mabbitt wrote: > I was curious -- is there a known issue with trying to use fxruby > gems under Mac OS X 10.4.11? After installing fxruby-1.6.19 via gem > under ruby 1.8.6, I''m getting load errors indicating that fxruby is > looking for the libpng library in /usr/X11/lib, when in fact Mac OS > X 10.4.11 doesn''t even
2013 Aug 01
1
[PATCH V3 0/3] networking: Use ETH_ALEN where appropriate
Convert the uses mac addresses to ETH_ALEN so it's easier to find and verify where mac addresses need to be __aligned(2) Change in V2: - Remove include/acpi/actbl2.h conversion It's a file copied from outside ACPI sources Changes in V3: - Don't move the pasemi_mac.h mac address to be aligned(2) Just note that it's unaligned. Joe Perches (3): uapi: Convert some uses of 6 to
2013 Aug 01
1
[PATCH V3 0/3] networking: Use ETH_ALEN where appropriate
Convert the uses mac addresses to ETH_ALEN so it's easier to find and verify where mac addresses need to be __aligned(2) Change in V2: - Remove include/acpi/actbl2.h conversion It's a file copied from outside ACPI sources Changes in V3: - Don't move the pasemi_mac.h mac address to be aligned(2) Just note that it's unaligned. Joe Perches (3): uapi: Convert some uses of 6 to
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] appropriate for run-time compilation of DSL?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:37 PM, edA-qa mort-ora-y <eda-qa at disemia.com> wrote: >> There isn't great support for this in the LLVM JIT, but IIRC some >> clients have managed this by subclassing the JITMemoryManager to copy >> the code when the function has finished being emitted.  I don't know >> if it's possible to ensure that the code will be position
2013 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Appropriate DS for implementing worklist
If you don't care about efficiency you can push (or at least insert) at the front of a(small or otherwise) vector. On Nov 3, 2013 3:32 AM, "Rekha R" <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing an analysis which requires creating worklist of basic blocks. > The worklist should be in FIFO order. I checked SmallVector (and similar > others) and found
1999 Dec 26
0
Looking for an appropriate forum
Sorry to bust in, folks, but I'm having some trouble integrating the OpenSSH RPMs in my Red Hat 6.1 system and was hoping somebody could point me at an appropriate place to ask my newbie questions. (I've been over the docs and they don't seem to apply to the problems I'm having.) -- http://www.pricegrabber.com | The best deals, all the time.
2004 May 28
1
[is this appropriate?] Anyone work for voicepulse or have experience with them
I hope this is appropriate for this list. I'm guessing that responses should probably be sent directly to me? (off-list) We're looking at voicepulse (www.voicepulse.com) because they seem to be offering the exact service we want ... they claim to be asterisk friendly ... but I'm a little concerned because I have questions I'd like to ask, and there's NO way to contact them