similar to: what is the limit max. characters of group names?

Hello, I want to prevent users to change file/directory rights and haven't found any possible solution. Setup: --------- * Samba 3.6.3 * using LDAP for users an groups Config: ---------- workgroup = Samba security = user ldap admin dn = uid=samba_user,cn=admin,o=company,c=net passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap01.company.net ldap suffix =

Hello dear list, I have running a Samba 3 server (under SLES11) connected to an LDAP-Server and it is running well. But now, I like to migrate to Samba 4 and I've made a few tests before. The whole time I with Samba 3, I was surprised about the many ldap requests so that I thought about an additional local OpenLDAP proxy cache. But now with Samba 4 (with the same configuration like Samba 3,

Hello, I've a problem on my system with inotify. In the smbd logfile are shown a lot messages like this: [2015/06/10 11:15:21.644453, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup) Failed to init inotify - Too many open files [2015/06/10 11:15:23.968497, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup)

Hello dear list, I need help with authentication configuration on samba. It is a little bit special ... We have a Linux-Server with all users/groups local configured. (nsswitch.conf points to passwd and groups) We have ONE share configured and under this shared folder are located separated project folders. On each project folder are set posix ACLs with two groups for read only and write

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:34:03 +0200 Meike Stone via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello dear list, > > can someone help me? > > The manual page clearly states: > "The idmap backend provides a plugin interface for *Winbind* to use > varying backends to store SID/uid/gid mapping tables." and > "ID mapping in Samba is the mapping between

Hello dear list, can someone help me? The manual page clearly states: "The idmap backend provides a plugin interface for *Winbind* to use varying backends to store SID/uid/gid mapping tables." and "ID mapping in Samba is the mapping between Windows SIDs and Unix user and group IDs. This is performed by *Winbindd* with a configurable plugin interface." So, that's the

Hi Meike, As far as I understood you are using ldapsam only when Samba is running as AD domain controller. And when Samba is running as AD DC, all user stuffs go to AD and so ldapsam. In the configuration you described I expect your users are existing twice: once in /etc/passwd as Linux users and once in Samba TDB as Samba users. As there is work to do to the change you speak about, why not

dovecot-2.2.21 ????? fts_autoindex - index-worker problem Hello List, I installed dovecot-2.2.21 on CentOS 6.7. I use ldap for userdb to separate an e-mail address and the user. Index to apache solr failed in fts_authindex when I received an email after setting. The error message is "indexer-worker: Error: User 0029 at 09.jp lookup failed: Unknown user" Is there any solution? This

Hello, we use samba with ldap backend. All is working well. Now the user count should grow to about 3000 users in a mixed environment with PCs and terminal servers. So the most of the users typically have (more than one) sessions to different terminal servers. The smb version is (tragically) still v1 and a lot of the clients comes over a NAT gateway. To reduce the traffic to the remote ldap

Hello, I'm trying to configure a CIFS-Proxy. My configuration is: [global] workgroup = MYDOM server role = member server realm = MYDOM.NET netbios name = FS01 server services = +smb +s3fs dcerpc endpoint servers = +winreg +srvsvc [test] ntvfs handler = cifs cifs:server = 192.168.1.10 cifs:share = projects$ but in

Hello, I run samba 3.6 and I need to track problems for dedicated users. So I thought, I load at the end via include special configurations for the user separately. My question is, how does the smbd configure itself. Does smbd 1) reads the config completely and then it set the parameters in the process or 2) does smbd reads and set each parameter instantly? So can I use the following example?

Hi all, I'm sure this has been discussed here before but at the time, it didn't apply to me ... until now. I'm trying to configure a public print share on a VAX/VMS system that doesn't require any password to connect to. Anything I've tried always asks the users for a password to make the connection. I don't much care about who connects to this system and its shares as

Hello Rowland, thanks for answering so fast. > > > > we have migrated our Samba server from version 3.6 to Samba 4.6. > > > > Everyting is working fine, but I have seen one difference in the > > output from "smbstatus -b". > > > > The hostname in the output is no longer displayed (see examples below) > > 1) The hostname must come from

David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about

FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects. Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?). On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to > the whole community so sending an FYI

Hello dear group, we have migrated our Samba server from version 3.6 to Samba 4.6. Everyting is working fine, but I have seen one difference in the output from "smbstatus -b". The hostname in the output is no longer displayed (see examples below) 1) The hostname must come from Session setup or similar, because we don't have any name resolution for clients. 2) The hostname from

The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels > such > as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here) > for > informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is

Hello, > As far as I understood you are using ldapsam only when Samba is running as > AD domain controller. it is only a standalone server, no sid/gid (mapping) needed. All users and groups are local (passwd/groups) maintained. We only want to authenticate the users against the ldap server (openDJ). No Active Directory is used. But if I configure, there are a lot (to much) ldap

> > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, > and often intimidating for newcomers > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use > multiple avenues of communication, it’s **really** hard to imagine email > as a **mechanism** being unfamiliar/difficult/intimidating. Moving to a > new mechanism wouldn’t alter the