similar to: Samba Upgrade-iad

I'm considering switching my incoming phones lines from standard analog to a T-1 service from XO communications. They propose to bring in an "IAD" which has 12 lines of voice and 768k of internet bandwidth as part of a package deal. Since I want to keep the voice traffic in the digital domain the equipment they're proposing is a "Lucent Digital Vina Integrator" IAD

As a follow-up to my previous post where I stated the IAD would be a Vina model, after some more prodding to XO, they have told me it will either be an Adtran TA-600 or a CAC Adit 600. These products are covered pretty well on the web and I have manuals on both. So, if those knowledgeable folks had to use one of these to attach to an Asterisk box, what interface would be best or at least

I repost a message I put a week ago: I have a Cisco IAD 2431 which has MGCP protocol; I cannot make it to work againts Asterisk; at least there is some MGCP conversation between them but when I offhook a phone attached to IAD I get no tone at all. As anybody managed to get working Asterisk against an MGCP Cisco gateway ? Which MGCP version should I use ? Also I recently

Hello, I have a cisco ATA 188 registering both of its lines to * I can place calls between then an to kphone an MSN messenger (both registering with * too), a few days ago a friend lend me a Cisco IAD 2430 and I was willing to do the same thing with it, since it has 24 ports I was willing to to use 24 analog phones with it however something really weird happens I can place calls from my ata,

I've recently connected a Samba server to our domain (ourdomain.dom) and configured it to send authentication requests to AD. I can successfully authenticate ourdomain.com users from the Samba server. ourdomain.com has a trust with a sister company (theirdomain.com). With this trust we can assign NTFS permissions to users within theirdomain.com to, for example, file servers on ourdomain.com.

I've been following the forums on this subject. I am still having problems implimenting this at my site. I am trying to replace a Novell 5 file server doing single server signon(workstation manager) with a linux/samba server and a W2K ADS server. I tried this with slackware 10.0, samba 3.0.10, MIT krb5 v 3.1 5, openldap-2.1.22 and got it pretty close (could login wihtout password) but had

I've set up the following and can open a home share for me (sylveg). I've created a group on W2KADS and on OURSAMBALINUX called oadmin and added me as a member in both. I created a samba share called o_drive (see smb.conf below) w/ the linux dir /home/o_drive and valid users = %D+oadmnin. The /home dir is: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2004-09-03 15:16 ftp/ drwx------ 2 root root

I've got three 7960s running v6 SIP firmware. My Asterisk setup has worked fine with grandstream devices, and basically, we're just upgrading to use nicer phones. Whilst I can make/receive calls from the 7960 to/from gossiptel). When I try to place a call, I get the following Jan 21 11:09:23 NOTICE[19688]: chan_sip.c:7271 handle_request: Failed to authenticate user "30"

>>>> Set >>>> >>>> ssl_client_ca_file=/path/to/cacert.pem to validate the certificate >>> >>> Can this be the Lets Encrypt cert that we already have? In other words we have: >>> ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem >>> ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem >>> >>> Can those be

Am still having problems getting Samba/W2K ADS to work w/MIT-KRB5. Fresh install of following: Slackware 10.1 Openldap 2.2.23 MIT krb5 1.4 Samba 3.0.11 (with clitar patch) Following "http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#ads-member" I get to: kinit administrator@OURORG.OURDOMAIN.ORG (comes back to prompt after password, no error. klist -e gives:

Hello, Sometime when we receive a spam or virus that is detected as it, mailer daemon send a reply to the sender to inform that the message is a spam or content viruses. The problem is that the sender of the spam as something like voicemail at ourdomain.fr ( the user voicemail doesn't exist in our database ) And sometimes dovecot create the directory and store the reply 's mail...

We have an urgent problem that we've been spending hours on to no avail. We have a RHEL 5.2 server that is running Samba 3.2.8 and was set up for domain authentication against our PDC. It was running fine until I decided to try and change it to "ads" authentication. I then realized that we needed to keep it on "domain" because of the version of Clearcase we have on the

I am not sure if this first post made it to the list, but I wanted to post the resolution, which was very simple and something I had documented but buried and I had forgotten about it. All these problems went away when I joined the domain using Samba's version of "net", not Redhat's. If you use Redhat's version, it looks like it joins the domain but it really doesn't

On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 15:02 -0800, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 09:19 -0800, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 12:00 -0500, James Atwell via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> On

Hi Louis, answers are inline ... On 03/24/2015 03:48 PM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Realm is advices to use UPPERCASE.. not obligated. ( but very advices yes ) I changed the config to uppercase and rebooted, no change in the logfiles. > > check the following outputs and post them back in the list ( if needed anonymized ) > > hostname -i 192.168.1.235 > hostname -s the-ad-hostname

Dear Samba community, We run two Samba server in a CTDB cluster in a small group withing a bigger company. We use Winbind to authenicate and authorize against a company-wide active directory (using `security = ads` and `idmap config OURDOMAIN : backend = ad`, resp., among others). So, if I understand this correctly authentication is done via Kerberos and authorization via LDAP. Unfortunately (but

Hello, I've been trying to figure this out for some time and can't quite nail it down, despite searching the internet, and a couple of samba books. Here goes: I'm running "Version 3.4.3-3.3.1-2341-SUSE-SL11.2" of Samba on OpenSUSE 11.2. Here are some relevant excerpts from my smb.conf file: [global] ... security = ADS ... winbind separator = + ... log level = 2 ...

Hello, I've been trying to figure this out for some time and can't quite nail it down, despite searching the internet, and a couple of samba books. Here goes: I'm running "Version 3.4.3-3.3.1-2341-SUSE-SL11.2" of Samba on OpenSUSE 11.2. Here are some relevant excerpts from my smb.conf file: [global] ... security = ADS ... winbind separator = + ... log level = 2 ...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:09:00 +0000 Howard Coles <hcoles at dollargeneral.com> wrote: > Here is the smb.conf made generic to pass on. The share I’m > concerned with at the moment is the "appprt" share, it's simple > enough but it's not recognizing that primary local group.: > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # Date: 2007/09/26 11:03:44 >

Hello. I'm facing an seemingly unsolvable problem on the Samba servers I administer (on Debian stable). Those servers are registered on a AD domain. They only serve files and are not registered as domain controllers. For some idendified users (always the same), Winbind periodically (but unpredicably) becomes unable to resolve their names, making their shares unavailable. A "net cache