similar to: Secondary DC's

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Secondary DC's"

2017 Mar 24
3
4 DC's to downgrade
Okay I didn't read that. surprised that it should work with the databases as is. The dbcheck function was quite involved when it was run on the 4.5.5. update. On Thursday, 23 March 2017, 20:21, Ray Klassen <julius_ahenobarbus at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: After upgrade massive slowdown network wide. Does not make sense that it's the samba, but I've nothing left. Question
2016 Apr 30
0
Samba 4.4.2 AD DC demote fails
On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 20:50 +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote: > Demotion of a AD DC fails with the following errors: > > If I explicitly select a partner server with the "--server=" option > the > error is: > > Deactivating inbound replication > Asking partner server [selectedDC] to synchronize from us > Error while demoting, re-enabling inbound replication >
2016 Apr 29
4
Samba 4.4.2 AD DC demote fails
Demotion of a AD DC fails with the following errors: If I explicitly select a partner server with the "--server=" option the error is: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server [selectedDC] to synchronize from us Error while demoting, re-enabling inbound replication ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnboundLocalError'>): uncaught exception - local variable
2014 Mar 24
1
Domain demote fails
Hi together, Demoting from a Win-Server-Based Active Directory fails root at srvf01:~# samba-tool domain demote --server windc-server -UAdministrator Using srv15.lan.compumaster.de as partner server for the demotion Password for [COMPUMASTER\Administrator]: Desactivating inbound replication Asking partner server windc-server to synchronize from us Error while demoting, re-enabling inbound
2017 Jan 03
1
AD Replication issues due to lingering objects
Do you tnink I can simply apt-get install from that repo to upgrade the current samba? Going down the demote/re-join route, I'm encountering problems demoting the DC: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server DC1.mydomain.local to synchronize from us Error while demoting, re-enabling inbound replication ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): Error while
2016 Mar 22
2
Unable to demote DC
I'm trying to remove a DC from a Samba4 based AD network, but run into an error that I can't fathom. Can anyone point me in the right direction? # samba-tool domain demote -Uadministrator GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5_sasl' registered GENSEC backend 'spnego' registered GENSEC
2013 Dec 08
0
2 Samba 4.1 DCs: demote fails with Python traceback
Hi, I have set up two AD DCs (both running Samba 4.1). This is my setup: dc1.mydomain.lan: The first DC (used for domain provision) dc2.mydomain.lan: Promoted to AD DC after domain setup I promoted dc2 using this command: samba-tool domain join mydomain.lan DC -Uadministrator --realm=mydomain.lan While the promotion worked without any issues I now want to demote dc2 again. This is what I did:
2016 Mar 23
0
Unable to demote DC
Hi Chris, Le 22/03/2016 22:07, Chris Hastie a écrit : > I'm trying to remove a DC from a Samba4 based AD network, but run into > an error that I can't fathom. Can anyone point me in the right direction? > > # samba-tool domain demote -Uadministrator which version of samba are you using? 4.4 or below? is the sogo3.ad.oak-wood.co.uk server still running ok or do you have
2017 May 26
1
Error while demoting Samba 4 DC
Hi, I have 2 DC Samba 4 in my network. My new DC is Samba 4.6.3 My Old DC is Samba 4.2.1 I want demote my DC (old) with Samba 4.2.1, but the following message appears: ~# samba-tool domain demote -Uadministrator Using dc1.empresa.com.br as partner server for the demotion Password for [EMPRESA\administrator]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server dc1.empresa.com.br to
2013 Aug 27
1
Replication issue
I have a server that is not replicating correctly, but passes all the tests listed here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC In particular running # host -t CNAME 976c9c86-288d-483e-baec-7043a9c4a6cd._msdcs.ncs.k12.de.us 976c9c86-288d-483e-baec-7043a9c4a6cd._msdcs.ncs.k12.de.us is an alias for ncssamba2.ncs.k12.de.us. returns correct information on all DCs.
2014 Aug 12
2
Four DCs, No Replication
I added three DCs to a single DC Samba4 AD domain. They initially replicated and came up - but replication does not appear to be ongoing. A change made to a user via MMC connected to one DC does not appear on another DC. It the logs I see bursts of the following message: [2014/08/12 15:08:08.026270, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:660(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid
2015 Feb 25
2
replication problems in samba4 ad domain
I started with one dc, 'dc1', running samba v4.0.21, in subnet1. I successfully added two more dc's, 'dc2' and 'dc3', both running samba v4.0.24, both in subnet2. There are several firewalls between subnets 1 & 2. I continued to make firewall holes on behalf of msad after I added dc's 2 & 3. I.e. when they were added, there were patterns of communication
2010 Apr 16
2
Any pitfalls updating straight from 3.0.34 to 3.5.2?
Okay, so I've just put the sernet repo file in my yum.repos.d directory and a yum update will elevate my samba server to the latest version. Is there any pitfall that is out there that I can avoid before yum updating. Centos 5.3 samba3-3.0.34-37 & related packages openldap-2.3.43-3.el5 & related packages I still have my samba3-3.0.34 packages squirreled away so I can force downgrade
2018 Jul 31
3
Winbind Craziness
Failed to find cifs/madmain at LAND.SUPERORG.COM(kvno 5) in keytab MEMORY:cifs_srv_keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)] so far nothing works forever. the above error happens when the pc's are unable to connect to shares net leave/join fixes the problem temporarily. seems to relate to [Samba] Failed to find cifs/foo.bar in keytab MEMORY:cifs_srv_keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)] On Monday, 30
2018 Sep 12
2
eventlog functionality
'right structure' is a bit above my level of knowledge.  microsoft documentation on NetSessionEnum level 10 has some sample code but I'm not sure how to implement it... On Wednesday, 12 September 2018, 07:59:50 GMT-7, Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 14:33 +0000, ray klassen via samba wrote: >  Are you saying that
2018 Nov 22
1
Index Corruption xBase database
from the man page. I've never tried veto oplocks. But it looks like something that might be useful... > veto oplock files (S) > > This parameter is only valid when the oplocks parameter is turned > on for a share. It allows the Samba administrator to selectively > turn off the granting of oplocks on selected files that match a >
2018 Nov 22
5
Index Corruption xBase database
Hello, I've been working with a xBase database (similar to dBase) in a multiuser application. There are like 40 users working on the database on the same time reading and like 10 writing information. Sometimes the CDX files (Index Files) get corrupted and is it's necessary to pack the tables (rebuild the indexes). I have notice using the smbstatus -B command the following Pid
2016 Aug 14
0
Horrible BIND9_DLZ DNS breakage after DC replaced and samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server
On 14/08/16 19:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:18:41 +0100 > Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>> Ok, lets just run through this: >>> You have an NT4-style PDC >> Correct. >>> You classicupgrade this to a DC >> Yes, with BIND9_DLZ DNS backend. >> >>> You join another computer as
2017 Jan 04
1
AD Replication issues due to lingering objects
Hai Tom, Sure, you can apt-get install from that repo. You have 3 options. 1) http://apt.van-belle.nl/ the apt repo. Use it like any apt repo. Info on the site. 2) http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/samba-4.5.3/ and use the installer This is when you want to get packages localy in you network and when you want to keep one version, and/or distribute this internaly. The installer script
2018 Jul 28
3
Winbind Craziness
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:25:04 +0000 (UTC) ray klassen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > so I had some time to follow this bunny trailand found that even > though all the other servers had no problems this one continued > to.Every so often a new computer couldn't connect and then it would > be all better after a net leave/net join. Net join would not work >