similar to: Multihomed AC DC Server and subnets

Hello: Recently I have tried Samba AD DC (Samba4), because I want migrate our Samba 3 installation to Samba AD DC (Samba4). My tests were successfully, I could migrate a copy o f my samba 3 installation. Now I want to migrate my real installation to Samba4 but my question is about packaging. For now there is not a v4.0 stable Samba package in Debian Wheezy, and I don't want install a rc

I am not sure if anyone has done this but I am assuming it has been done before. Setting up a multihomed DHCP server accross multiple network blocks to issue PXE/BOOTP setup actions? Some background, I have successfully setup PXE to work with a cross over cable (first setup and testing env.), moved cient/server to switch and configured boot menu, images etc. and now after setting up the

We are having a problem getting a NetApp filer to re-join a samba domain after a move to a new network. The filer worked fine with samba before the move. Apologies in advance for the long missive. I've tried the following: - re-running the CIFS setup program on the filer - removing the problem filer's samba account, replacing it, and re-running the setup program on the filer

Hi there, I just got a new machine with Redhat Enterprise Workstation and samba 3.0.0-14 pre-installed. I am trying to connect it to my existing network which has a redhat v8 samba v2 PDC controlling 16 or so win2k and winxp machines. In the nmbd log I get this error 3 times every 5 seconds or so: nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_nmb_request(1448) process_nmb_request: Multihomed registration

Chris, Perhaps you need to perform some write_conf like command. I''m not sure if this is needed in 1.6 or not. Shane ----- Original Message ----- From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> To: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org> Sent: Fri Mar 07 12:03:17 2008 Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Multihomed

Hello List, I have a problem with the CA on my Puppetmaster. This Puppetmaster is connected to different Networks with different sub domainnames. The Puppet clients connecting via different Interfaces. There is no routing between subnets. Only one subnet can connect successfully. This is because the subject in the Certificate is the name of this subnet. All other clients get: Could not

Hi! We have the following scenario: Subnet 1 ======= Contains PDC for domain DOM1 all clients in this subnet belong to DOM1 Subnet 2 ======= contains PDC for domain DOM2 all clients in this subnet belong to DOM2 These two subnets are connected via a multihomed linux box set up as a router between these subnets. IP routing definately works ok. What we want to achive is, to have full NetBIOS

You can see by the subject I've got an ugly problem. Even though I don't have a Samba server anywhere near the network in question, nobody understands browsing as well as the folks on the Samba team. :-) Here's the situation: I've got two workgroups, FLINTSTONE and RUBBLE which are on physically separate networks. FLINTSTONE has a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928 Summary: Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication does not work with multihomed hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=108008882620573 OS/Version: All

(was: "Re: Pending OpenSSH release, call for testing", topic drift at its finest :-) Markus Moeller wrote: > Douglas, > > OK three possible settings(hostname,connection IP,GSS_C_NO_NAME) are fine for me too. Does GSS_C_NO_NAME relate to this bug (addressless tickets)? http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 BTW, I opened a bug the the multihomed thing a couple of

That is what I thought, but just to clarify: I am using static dhcp hosts in the dhcpd.conf and our network config. is similar to this: 3 subnets 192.168.15.0/24 192.168.16.0/24 192.168.17.0/24 dhcpd.conf ### Global Settings for DHCP Services ### option domain-name="dom.com"; default-lease-time 900; max-lease-time 1800; ddns-update-style none; authoritative; allow bootp; allow

>From: "Eddie Irvine" <eirvine@tpgi.com.au> >To: <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> >Subject: Logging on to the network - one samba, two subnets. >I have Samba set up to serve W95 PCs. Kids "log in to the >network" using their Unix password. Students get their >Unix home dir mounted as network drive X: when login is >successful.> >This all happens

Hi folks - I'm having an issue here. I have my samba server sitting on one subnet, and the rest of the clients sitting on another (due to IP administration reasons). I assign both my clients and the server to the same workgroup, but the winboxen clients can't browse to the samba server. The win clients all have WINS resolution turned on, and I specified all of my WINS servers in

Hello, I'm getting these errors on a samba 2.2.8a wins server in a NT4 network: [2003/11/25 09:41:00, 0] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request (1022) wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request: group name registration request received for name DOMAIN<00> from IP 192.168.10.5 on subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET. Errror - group names should not be

Hi, This is another attempt to get my gssapi for multi homed systems into openssh. Please find attach a small change so that gssapi authentication works on multihomed systems. Regards Markus -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssh-3.8p1-mm.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3599 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Hi all, i''m new at LARTC, and after reading the docs I found no solution to my problem ... On one side I have eth0 conected to the LAN, on the other side I have eth1 conected to a switch and to 3 DSL routers with 3 diferent providers, and also eth2 conected to a cisco 2600 conected to a LDMS line. I have readed the larct docs about multihomed conections to internet, but I''m

Hi all! This is a repost to this list, hoping to draw some extra attention because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies as described below is best. I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are

Hi Im a little perplexed by this situation I have centos 4.5 installed on 2 pcs - each with 2 network cards machine 1 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:2A:6B:C8:CC inet addr:10.54.7.2 Bcast:10.54.7.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:50:9B:A2:90 inet addr:10.54.0.2 Bcast:10.54.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 machine 2 eth0

Hi We have two subnets with routing tables correctly set up so they can both ping to our Sun Solaris Box. 193.71.221 191.9.211 The Sun Solaris box lives on 193.71.221.1 and all PCs on that subnet can map to the Sun box without any problems. All PCs on the 191.9.211 cannot connect to the samba drives giving the error "Network not Found". Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks

I would like to know how to view a samba server on a different subnet than the client workstation resides. For example, I have a Samba 1.9.18p3 server in subnet 'a' and a NT 4.0 client in subnet 'b'. The Samba server does not show up when the NT client double-clicks on the Network Neighborhood. However, if the client does a Find:computer it will find the server, and shares can be