similar to: Sites And Services Setup

On 9/18/2016 6:23 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > For the unsorted attributeID values errors, can you first try: > > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' > > There's too much going on, and it does look like it might be bailing > out. Running it with 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' should fix those > first

On 9/21/2016 11:32 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > I would have assumed that deleting all the NTDS connections for all the > DCs would have remedied this issue. I'll write a patch to try to avoid > this error in any case. > > Ignoring this error and answering your earlier question, it's often hard > to tell if the KCC is doing what is expected or not. To figure that out, >

On 9/28/2016 1:25 AM, garming at catalyst.net.nz wrote: >> >> Wasn't aware of this. Thank you for the info. If I was to delete the >> incorrect respsFrom/repsTo attributes, wouldn't the KCC just >> regenerate them over time once the KCC check and ISTG check kicked in? > > As long as the topology doesn't change or DCs which are not > bridgeheads do not

Another old thread I’m resurrecting; apologies, but I have also been experiencing this issue. I have 10 international remote sites over very lossy WAN links. Getting traffic to them from HQ is a challenge; them trying to talk directly each other over umpteen paths is even worse. They are able to accomplish this (somewhat) because we have a mesh VPN setup with direct site-to-site connectivity, but

On 9/22/2016 6:31 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> For clarification I'll add a few things. >> >> I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed >> the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe >> correctly. By that I mean it defined what appeared to be a bridgehead

Hi, James, yes, I set up sites through the sites and services tool. It's not that it's fully connected replication, but that the RepsTo attribute, under equal conditions with windows, is not filled on the samba side, which in turn entails that the outbound neighbors are not displayed on the samba side . But let me clarify that I even made each server (there is only one in each site) a

Hello, Updated samba from 4.4.5 to 4.5.0. All DC's are Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. I install samba from source(./configure,make,make install). Looking at the release notes I see the section on "replPropertyMetaData Chnages". I run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes' and see the errors and samba attempts to fix. ERROR: unsorted attributeID values in

Hi everybody, I'm playing with the new Improved KCC of samba 4.3.X Here is my network's topology : - DC : smb4dc located on Default-First-site-Name - DC : dc110 located on PetitQuevilly - DC : dc113 located on SaintEtienne - DC : dc120 located on Barentin - Etc.... (total of 15 DC) I want smb4dc acting as a bridge head for all others

Hi Adam, I reviewed your images but those don?t appear to be from the Microsoft tool Active Directory Sites and Services. Have you used this tool specifically to configure your sites? Can you attach images from this tool on how you configured your sites? Specifically, the NTDS settings and subnets? -James From: Adam Abramson <abramsona30 at gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 11,

Adam, When you have one DC in a site, the sole DC automatically considers itself a bridgehead server to other DC?s once the site links have been setup. Should be no need to manually configure this. I see you have NTDS connections for WIN2019-2 and Samba on each DC. In theory you shouldn?t be having an issue with no outbound neighbors. What I would do is delete the automatically generated

Adam, While you?re confirming your sites and services setup. See the link for how I have my sites setup. I have sanitized some if it and it?s from a Samba only environment but should still be setup similarly for Samba or mixed environments. https://ibb.co/hZPJkxw I have 2 DC?s per site. The Site ?D? and Server ?D5? has outbound neighbors of ?D4? and S6? of site ?S?. Site ?S? if I

in my case, there is exactly one controller in the site and therefore the attribute is not filled in. in your case, it seems to me that your repsFrom repsTo attributes are filled because there are 2 controllers in the site , but on the windows side, even when 1 controller is filled, both attributes are filled On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 4:44?PM James Atwell via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>

OK, I'm sending a screenshot specifically from win2019-2 . Looking at all the connections, they are of course displayed https://ibb.co/Qbz3PZz On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 5:36?PM James Atwell via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks for the images, however I need to see your NTDS settings for server > WIN2019-2. If you open this, you should see automatically generated

Thanks for the images, however I need to see your NTDS settings for server WIN2019-2. If you open this, you should see automatically generated connections to servers in Default-First-Site-Name and Test-Samba sites. This assumes you have servers in Default-First-Site-Name. Otherwise you should just see the Samba server. -James From: Adam Abramson <abramsona30 at gmail.com> Sent:

On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > For clarification I'll add a few things. > > I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed > the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe > correctly. By that I mean it defined what appeared to be a bridgehead > server at each site. So I disabled the new KCC >

Hello list, I run 2 Samba 4.7.1 RODCs. One in my Default-First-Site-Name and in additional Site where only Samba RODC exists. When I start samba_kcc on first RODC it run’s without errors. If I start samba_kcc on RODC in additional Site it fails with: /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_kcc: Traceback (most recent call last): /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_kcc: File

On 9/24/2016 7:32 AM, Denis Cardon wrote: > > the job of the samba_kcc script is to create the ntdsConnection > objects. Afterward the repsFrom/repsTo attribute are created in > accordance with the ntdsConnection objects (you can force the creation > using samba-tool drs replicate although). You can check that the > process is asynchronous when you join a new DC, the INBOUND

Hi, Do you have some link to explain what are the difference between new and old KCC? Is it the old one do not respect "NTDS Settings" links in "Active Directory Sites and Services" console and force replication between every DC? If yes new KCC would rely on what is defined into each server's "NTDS Settings", is it? 2016-11-18 17:01 GMT+01:00 lingpanda101 via

Hi! In Option "Inter-Site Transports", i have only  one the name "DEFAULTIPSITELINK" , in properties Sites in this link: Matriz Filial Matriz -> site with DC1 and DC2 Filail ->  site With DC3 Regards; On 17-05-2018 13:12, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> But, i allowed

On 10/29/2015 9:56 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 14:37 schrieb James: >> On 10/29/2015 9:15 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 13:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >>>> Thank you for hint to this VBS script. In fact I alraedy saw it but >>>> I'm not >>>> too confident in my VB knowledge, so