similar to: Sites And Services Setup

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Sites And Services Setup"

2016 Sep 21
2
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 9/18/2016 6:23 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > For the unsorted attributeID values errors, can you first try: > > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' > > There's too much going on, and it does look like it might be bailing > out. Running it with 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' should fix those > first
2016 Sep 22
2
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 9/21/2016 11:32 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > I would have assumed that deleting all the NTDS connections for all the > DCs would have remedied this issue. I'll write a patch to try to avoid > this error in any case. > > Ignoring this error and answering your earlier question, it's often hard > to tell if the KCC is doing what is expected or not. To figure that out, >
2016 Sep 28
2
updates of repsFrom/repsTo attributes (was : Re: replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0)
On 9/28/2016 1:25 AM, garming at catalyst.net.nz wrote: >> >> Wasn't aware of this. Thank you for the info. If I was to delete the >> incorrect respsFrom/repsTo attributes, wouldn't the KCC just >> regenerate them over time once the KCC check and ISTG check kicked in? > > As long as the topology doesn't change or DCs which are not > bridgeheads do not
2016 Jun 25
1
Sites And Services Setup
Another old thread I’m resurrecting; apologies, but I have also been experiencing this issue. I have 10 international remote sites over very lossy WAN links. Getting traffic to them from HQ is a challenge; them trying to talk directly each other over umpteen paths is even worse. They are able to accomplish this (somewhat) because we have a mesh VPN setup with direct site-to-site connectivity, but
2016 Sep 23
6
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 9/22/2016 6:31 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> For clarification I'll add a few things. >> >> I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed >> the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe >> correctly. By that I mean it defined what appeared to be a bridgehead
2016 Sep 12
4
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
Hello, Updated samba from 4.4.5 to 4.5.0. All DC's are Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. I install samba from source(./configure,make,make install). Looking at the release notes I see the section on "replPropertyMetaData Chnages". I run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes' and see the errors and samba attempts to fix. ERROR: unsorted attributeID values in
2015 Dec 29
1
Question with new Samba 4.3's Improved KCC
Hi everybody, I'm playing with the new Improved KCC of samba 4.3.X Here is my network's topology : - DC : smb4dc located on Default-First-site-Name - DC : dc110 located on PetitQuevilly - DC : dc113 located on SaintEtienne - DC : dc120 located on Barentin - Etc.... (total of 15 DC) I want smb4dc acting as a bridge head for all others
2016 Sep 22
0
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > For clarification I'll add a few things. > > I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed > the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe > correctly. By that I mean it defined what appeared to be a bridgehead > server at each site. So I disabled the new KCC >
2017 Nov 09
2
samba_kcc RODC failes with NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Hello list, I run 2 Samba 4.7.1 RODCs. One in my Default-First-Site-Name and in additional Site where only Samba RODC exists. When I start samba_kcc on first RODC it run’s without errors. If I start samba_kcc on RODC in additional Site it fails with: /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_kcc: Traceback (most recent call last): /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_kcc: File
2016 Sep 26
4
updates of repsFrom/repsTo attributes (was : Re: replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0)
On 9/24/2016 7:32 AM, Denis Cardon wrote: > > the job of the samba_kcc script is to create the ntdsConnection > objects. Afterward the repsFrom/repsTo attribute are created in > accordance with the ntdsConnection objects (you can force the creation > using samba-tool drs replicate although). You can check that the > process is asynchronous when you join a new DC, the INBOUND
2016 Nov 18
1
4.5.0 as AD, missing replication links
Hi, Do you have some link to explain what are the difference between new and old KCC? Is it the old one do not respect "NTDS Settings" links in "Active Directory Sites and Services" console and force replication between every DC? If yes new KCC would rely on what is defined into each server's "NTDS Settings", is it? 2016-11-18 17:01 GMT+01:00 lingpanda101 via
2018 May 17
3
Dcs Replication
Hi! In Option "Inter-Site Transports", i have only  one the name "DEFAULTIPSITELINK" , in properties Sites in this link: Matriz Filial Matriz -> site with DC1 and DC2 Filail ->  site With DC3 Regards; On 17-05-2018 13:12, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> But, i allowed
2016 Sep 24
0
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 2016-09-24 06:53, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 9/22/2016 6:31 PM, Garming Sam wrote: >> On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>> For clarification I'll add a few things. >>> >>> I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed >>> the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe
2015 Oct 30
2
Demote a dead PDC: residuals in "DNS" console
On 10/29/2015 9:56 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 14:37 schrieb James: >> On 10/29/2015 9:15 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 13:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >>>> Thank you for hint to this VBS script. In fact I alraedy saw it but >>>> I'm not >>>> too confident in my VB knowledge, so
2015 Oct 30
2
Demote a dead PDC: residuals in "DNS" console
On 10/30/2015 9:19 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 30.10.2015 um 13:33 schrieb James: >> On 10/29/2015 9:56 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:37 schrieb James: >>>> On 10/29/2015 9:15 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.10.2015 um 13:54 schrieb mathias dufresne:
2015 Oct 30
2
Demote a dead PDC: residuals in "DNS" console
On 10/30/2015 10:11 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 30.10.2015 um 14:56 schrieb James: >> On 10/30/2015 9:19 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 30.10.2015 um 13:33 schrieb James: >>>> On 10/29/2015 9:56 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:37 schrieb James:
2018 May 17
1
Dcs Replication
On 5/17/2018 3:58 PM, Carlos wrote: > > Hi! > > In "NTDS settings" created new connection for: > > DC2 ->DC3 > > DC3 -> DC2 > > All OK, > > I tested with option > > kccsrv:samba_kcc=No > > is ok too. > > But in my DC2, a received one erro: > > May 17 16:54:44 dc2 samba[10421]: [2018/05/17 16:54:44.543336,  0] >
2018 Mar 16
2
performance problem on bridgehead DC
Hi Louis, Move up to 4.7 is planned soon but I'm little scared to update bridgehead if it actually had performance problem. I would like to fix all problem before updating. My smb.conf is really simple: [global] workgroup = PR realm = pr.educationetformation.fr netbios name = DC000 server role = active directory domain controller bind interfaces only
2018 Mar 16
0
performance problem on bridgehead DC
Jessie also has the problem, even before the meltdown patches. The kernel 3.16.x had ksoftirqd probems, eating up cpu cicles. Make sure you use kernel 4.9.0-6 And i suggest move up to samba 4.7.x or 4.7.4 from debian/buster, Or use my 4.6.12/4.7.6 packages for stretch, or ask if Tranquil.it can make them. The 4.6.14 is still in the make atm for stretch, 4.6.14 for jessie is done. And last,
2018 May 17
2
Dcs Replication
On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:01:48 -0300 Carlos <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > I dont have DC4... > But, i shutdown DC1(manutenção) > i created user in DC2, this user doesn't exist in DC3, never > replication... is not problem? > > Regards... > > On 17-05-2018 17:49, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:37:28 -0300 > > Carlos