similar to: Ubuntu 14.04 as an Active Directory Domain Controller

I'm setting up a bind server as well as a samba domain on a machine (timcserv03). I initially set the local domain up in bind as thisismycompany.local (already owning the name thisismycompany.com), however I started to see that there could be issues with using .local, so wanted to go in a safer direction. It seems the best logical internal domain name would be local.thisismycompany.com. Note

Timo Altun schrieb am 19.03.2015 10:30: > As I wrote in my first mail, Kerberos does work. I can successfully request > and list a ticket on the AC DC. OK, then next things, which come to my mind are: is the keytab, you set in named.conf.options readable for the user, under which bind is run. Then, is the /etc/bind/namedb writable for bind. And in the end, it might be a screwed up

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Peter Serbe <peter at serbe.ch> wrote: > If the domain is set up as > [global] > workgroup = LOCAL > realm = local.thisismycompany.com > then the domain users would log in as local\flast. > I am not sure, whether LOCAL makes up a good domain name... Thanks for adding clarity Peter. I'm having trouble framing my questions so

zone "local.thisismycompany.com" { type slave; masters { *your DCs go here* }; file "/etc/bind/namedb/bak.local.thisismycompany.com"; forwarders{}; }; If you are setting up bind on the DC like that, you have a problem, you are not using DLZ. Rowland

I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a name server and use all the others from the list provided by dhcp. But it was too nice to be true, because NetworkManager was there, ready to mess up anything I try to do, including the

Can Samba 4.1.x be compiled fully static? On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Peter Serbe <peter at serbe.ch> wrote: > Jed Evnull schrieb am 17.02.2015 23:14: > > [Static cross-compile of Samba] > > The static 3.2.15 works fine on the pi, but fails under android since it > > can't find user root or guest. But that's another issue, I don't expect > any >

Thank you Louis for that answer! Actually I did get kinit and samba_dnsupdate working, though I am unsure how. I tried some changes to krb5.conf in the [realms] and [domain_realm] sections, als well as setting dns_lookup_realm = false to true, but reverted it all back to the initial file: [libdefaults] default_realm = INTRANET.MAYWEG.NET dns_lookup_realm = false dns_lookup_kdc = true After a

NetworkManager used to work fine for me but during the last few installations its a big hurdle in the wireless connectivity. I'm using Madwifi and its interface is correctly listed and working but I cannot connect to any wifi AP without NetworkManager. I've two interfaces: eth0 and wifi0. Starting NetworkManager doesn't show any notification icon in the top right in gnome and I believe

On 29/07/16 15:12, Rowland penny wrote: > > Does the DC have a fixed ip and if not, why not. > If it does have a fixed ip, what is it > > Once you answer these, I will advise you how to fix your set up > > Rowland > > OK, this is what I would change on your setup, but I would also make backups before changing anything. smb.conf: [global] workgroup =

Hey Peter, many thanks for your reply. --- regarding .local domains I know this is regarded by some as bad form, is actively being discouraged by the samba wiki and can cause problems with bonjour/zerobla configuration. I can say for certain that no apple devices will ever come anywhere near that network and the other drawbacks of .local like getting signed certs... should never be an issue

Le 17/03/2015 12:40, Peter Serbe a ?crit : >> "is it feasible/are there any caveat" > Baseline is: not feasible. > The baseline is: only one samba per box. > You need to different IPs, which operate > independently from each other, as You can't > move the ports, where Your daemons are listening. > You would also need different daemons listening > on these

Oliver Rath schrieb am 07.03.2015 12:52: > which linux do you run on raspberry? Ive installed Debian 8 (Jessi) and > compiled samb42 on it, runs fine. Well, he is on a Raspi 2, which is - if I did understand this right - a different architecture. Maybe I did not understand him enough. But anyway, I would presume, that there is hardly any information out on the new Raspi 2... It's

> > > From: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:29:18 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Samba] ps aux | grep smbd > On 17/02/15 05:14, Jed Evnull wrote: > >> I recently compiled samba-3.2.15 for a Raspberry Pi V2 and while it seems >> to be working fine, when I ps aux | grep smbd I'm

I'm struggling with getting this to work smoothly, meaning 1) from the host system I can resolve the names of the VM's and 2) from the VM's I can properly resolve the host name (I get 127.0.0.1, presumably because dnsmasq parsed /etc/hosts on the host). There was some encouraging discussion of this in 2010 (http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-March/msg00005.html) but no

Hi, My local server is running CentOS 7. The machine has two NICs and is acting as a gateway. For DHCP and DNS, I'm using Dnsmasq. I have a strange little problem with local hostname resolution. Before going into more details, here's my configuration. [root at nestor:~] # ifconfig enp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.2 netmask

hi: my company has two dns servers, but samba4 internal dns forward can only forward to 1 server. to workarround it i run dnsmasq as dns cache at 127.0.0.1 and let samba4 dns forward to 127.0.0.1. my smb.conf looks like: dns forwarder = 127.0.0.1 interfaces = 10.1.1.1 bind interfaces only = Yes with the setting samba won't bind to 127.0.0.1, so dnsmasq can use 127.0.0.1 to do the work.

Hallo, thanks but this doesn t work here allthough most tips and hints are using this parameter. Any idea how to debug ? Thanks Ralf Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 29.01.2019 um 18:08 schrieb Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: > >> On 2019-01-29, Ralf Prengel <ralf.prengel at rprengel.de> wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> I try to configure my

Hi guys, thanks again for the quick answers. First, the smb.conf on the linux fileserver. It is quite long, as I took the old file (working version from samba3 configuration) and only made adjustments, like adding the realm. /etc/samba/smb.conf: [global] ### Browsing/Identification ### workgroup = MAYWEG.NET realm = INTRANET.MAYWEG.NET netbios name = server13 smb ports = 139, 445

On 22/01/15 14:25, Peter Serbe wrote: > Sorry, I seemed to express that very misleading. > The snippet below aimed at an additional Bind server, > that is slave to the one on the DC(s). > I would be configured to pull the public DNS information > from an external forwarder (as 8.8.8.8 from Google) and > the internal information from *your DCs go here*. > Then the line

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : 1. simple local server 2. public facing server 3. router/gateway/firewall I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based on NetworkManager. Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some headache. Let me