similar to: mget timeout

Hi, Currently, OpenSSH only accepts the SOCKS5 command "CONNECT": <https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/tree/channels.c#n1281> The RFC also specifies the commands "BIND" and "UDP ASSOCIATE": <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1928#section-4> As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" cannot proxify UDP packets. Are

Le mardi 17 janvier 2017 ? 9:20 +1100, Darren Tucker a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Romain Vimont <rom at rom1v.com> wrote: > [...] > > As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" > > cannot proxify UDP packets. > > > > Are there deep reasons why OpenSSH does not implement them (security, or > >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 Summary: Undocumented mget and mput in sftp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: sftp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: Maldoror at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 ------- Additional Comments From jason at rndpkt.org 2002-03-28 15:26 ------- mget and mput are just "aliased" commands to get and put, I'm assuming for some kind of compatability. mget and mput expect the get and put parameters and DO NOT function like FTP-based mget and mput (i.e. mget file1 file2.. file#). I'd be happy

This is on FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE, doing an mget with wildcard char on a non-existent file(s) produces a SEGV. Reproduce the bug as follows (Note: "zqw*" is a pattern that does not match): % sftp user at host user at host's password: sftp> mget zqw* Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x804c5db in process_get (conn=0x80520e0, src=0x80540b0 "zwq*",

A couple of notes about mget/mput in SFTP (5.1p1). 1. They aren't documented in the SFTP man page 2 They misbehave -- "mput a.txt b.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput *.txt b.txt" copies the first wildcard match to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt b.txt c.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt

Hi, I'm using smbclient to replicate a samba share from one Linux machine to another one. Unluckily, the amount of data is quite large, thus I'd like to transfer it with a compression, but I didn't find such as asny option in smbclient. Is it possible? Thanks, Luca P.S. I cannot use, in this case, other tools like rsync, just only smb!

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:15:48PM +0200, LPC DPG via samba wrote: > Dear fellows. > > Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V > Version 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient

Dear all. Confirmed: compilation of 4.12.6 produces same result, mput + recurse ignores mask for files. Will you please tell me if you need further details, or which steps I should follow? Should I file a bug? Many thanks. Best regards. El mar., 25 ago. 2020 a las 9:52, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear Andrew. > > You are right, I should have taken a deeper look

Hi all, An interesting discovery: if you want to convert an environment to a list, and you already know the names of the objects in the environment, using mget is about twice as fast as using as.list on the environment. https://gist.github.com/hadley/5434786 Hadley -- Chief Scientist, RStudio http://had.co.nz/

Hi all, not sure if you will call this a bug or something else but the following silly call trigger a low level error: foo <- list(x=1) class(foo) <- "new" print.new <- function(x, ...) print(mget(names(formals()))) foo > Error: C stack usage 7969412 is too close to the limit -- Alexandre Courtiol http://sites.google.com/site/alexandrecourtiol/home *"Science is

Currently, when mget() is used to get the value of a function's argument with no default value and no value in the call it returns the empty name (R_MissingArg). Is that the right thing to do or should it return 'ifnotfound' or give an error? E.g., > a <- (function(x) { y <- "y from function's environment"; mget(c("x","y","z"),

Dear folks. Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 distribution is not the most up to date version I should test this on, as it also limits how easy is compiling most recent versions of Samba, but I assume though this is not a tricky test, and should work as documented in both 4.4 and 4.2

Dear R community, I am a beginner to R and have a question concerning mget, about I could not find anything in the various documentation. I have a column in a dataframe x for which I want to get values in y: mget(x[,1], env=y, ifnotfound=NA) I receive an error mesage: Error in mget(x[, 1], env = y, ifnotfound = NA) : attempt to use zero-length variable name this is probably due to

Dear Rowland. So sorry, I did not get the responses to this e-mail address, got them by the purest change googling again. I'm sorry to disagree with your approach: 1-. In my most recent updates you should have seen I am compiling Samba4 from source. Began with packaged distribution, but considering it might be a bug, I decided to test myself. 4 different versions, same behaviour. This means

Hello R-philes: I have the following function that gets the output of mget() and converts it to a data frame to return. What I am finding is that the dimensions are wrong. Basically, I get: bridesmaid wed u see m gt lt like love X.0 dress pagetrack one go X3 get 1 56 35 27 30 24 20 20 23 28 17 25 16 16 28 15 26 Instead, I want something like: [1] bridesmaid

I'm posting this message in charge of Denis MARS (France), because he is not a subscriber of teh list and I worked with him about the same problem. Domenico Viggiani ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I worked on this problem since three weeks and now i really give up. Clearly i can't go further without your help. I hesitate to send you this bug

Dear Andrew. You are right, I should have taken a deeper look into the standard output during compilation. I did just assume source4 was the one for Samba4. Anyway, besides the source confusion (really, even if I had found the right one, following the code would have been out of my reach), I don't seem to find how that is related with the documentation issue, or the mput/mask/recurse

Dear all. I would like to propose a possible way to make mget and mput behave more or less the same way, rather that just changing documentation. Please, bear in mind this is a poor attempt coming from a person with no C skills at all, so other than testing that only filtered files are transferred, I have not gone further. Hope at least to have been able not to corrupt any pointer, but I'm