similar to: Struggling to get DC Setup/Validated with BIND_DLZ

Hi I'm currently testing the replacement of a samba 3 with LDAP backend with a samba 4 ad-dc. For this, I have a fresh install of: - FreeBSD 10.2 - samba 4.3.3 - bind with dlopen-support: IND 9.10.3-P3 <id:bdaecad> built by make with '--localstatedir=/var' '--disable-linux-caps' '--with-dlopen=yes' '--disable-symtable'

Dear all, after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain. There is an error on using, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well. [root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.135.253'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV

Hello, Replication from backup Active Directory Domain Controler to primary Active Directory Domain Controler does not work, reporting error ' WERR_BADFILE '. The reverse works. * Linux: Raspbian, debian stretch lite * Samba version 4.5.12-Debian * DNS: BIND9_DLZ 9.10.x * Installed packages: ntp ntpdate samba smbclient winbind libcups2 samba-common cups ldb-tools bind9

Hi! I've got troubles with dynamic dns updates. Ubuntu: 12.04 / Samba 4.0.0 / followed off. howto Winsrv: Server 2k8R2 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# samba -V Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-94f11e9 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# kinit administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL Password for administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL: root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator

Hi all I have configured domain controler in debian 9 (samba 4.5.12-Debian). Dns is internal samba. locally works well (I think) but from another computer I can not query DNS. The problem is with samba_dnsupdate My configuration: smb.conf # Global parameters [global]     netbios name = DC     realm = BEWPHOTO.LOCAL     workgroup = BEWPHOTO     dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8     server role = active

Hello everybody, I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS; - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as DC to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End; - *king* has updated dns zones and

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >> >> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there is >> some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the top >> levels: FQDN and _msdcs.FQDN). >> >> Could this have to do with...

Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>> >>>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>>> is some entry for the

Hi, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.1.20'] force update: A samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: NS empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: NS _msdcs.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: A empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: SRV _ldap._tcp.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 389 force update: SRV

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

Hmm.. > >>>> Could this have to do with... > >>>> a) I demoted my initial 1st DC (seized FSMO roles) and got rid of > >>>> DNS entries via this script on the wiki? > >>>> b) set up the *new* 2nd DC on the hardware of the prior 1st DC > >>>> (with the same IP address)? This can be a problem yes, depending on the order of

On 10/12/15 15:13, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, >>>>> just again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> If I go through the DNS

; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Mayabe update/setup your TSIG key. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_enterprise/2/html/puppet_deployment_guide/generating_a_bind_tsig_key Im also wondering why RH is using : '--disable-isc-spnego' Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]

On 12/08/2019 20:19, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Rowland, > did read, actually cited the page it myself, but didn?t help me to identify the cause. > Kerberos credentials exists, dns users exists, file permission are correct. So either that is insufficient or I am blind.. > Regards, Joachim > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at

Hi Ole, Using internal DNS samba_dnsupdate does not work correctly, at least not every time. Someone modified this samba_dnsupdate tool commenting this line: os.unlink(tmpfile) which should line 413. Doing that he was able to get files generated by samba_dnsupdate to use them as argument of nsupdate command (without -g switch and with "allow dns updates = nonsecure" in smb.conf). I

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

hello, we've just upgraded from samba 3.6.6 to samba 4.3.0. We are using INTERNAL as dns backend. We have 1 domain and 6 DCs on 5 different sites. Replication between DCs is ok as we can see with "samba-tool drs showrepl". We configured them like it is described on the wiki and used the RSAT tool "Sites and services" to add sites, subnets, links ... But for the 4 DCs

I joined a Fedora Linux box running Samba 4.1.5 to a Windows Server 2000 domain controller as an additional domain controller with the command: samba-tool domain join adi.com DC -Uadministrator --realm=adi.com --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ The messages indicated that this was mostly sucessfull with the exception of the message: NO DNS zone information found in source domain, not replicating DNS

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca