similar to: samba versions as ad dc

Hi David Thanks you for reply, are you sure about this? Windows and Samba SMB byte range locking feature doesn't allow this by locking regions of a single file ? From: "David Bear" <dwbear75 at gmail.com> To: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante.colo at stwbrasil.com> Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:59:56 PM

A "good" acl manual. http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/ACL/linux-acl.html As i do prefeer the debian os, but i do really like the archlinux wiki. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Access_Control_Lists Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Frank Kahle > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 augustus 2016 13:55

Hi, I just upgraded in Ubuntu from the ubuntu-package samba 4.1.6 do a self-compiled version 4.1.12. If anybody else happens to have the same task (pdc, not ad), this is how it worked: # do all following as root sudo su - # remove ubuntu samba 4.1.6 aptitude remove samba # install samba 4.1.12 from source aptitude install build-essential libacl1-dev libattr1-dev \ libblkid-dev

I am trying to allow users with permissions in one group (DEV) to have full access to a folder that is owned by (QA). I have not been able to figure this out. Its running samba 4.2 in WORKGROUP mode (I can find everything for domain but I am not ready for that). Its running on freebsd on the latest nas4free build NAS with a ZFS file system.. Thanks in advance Frank Kahle FileCatalyst |

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

Is there a list of GPO functions that are known not to work with samba 4.1 ? We have a case where some settings in a GPO will get applied, and others don't. -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

I have been wanting to allow our routers to continue to serve dhcp thinking this would give us a safer fail environment. Now we are learning that our routers can handle creating a whitelist of mac addresses to use for dhcp leases. So we need to look at alternatives. I am wondering how many samba AD DC's also run dhcp -- and if there is a samba 'good practice' for managing dhcp. Yes, I

Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual nics and if there may be a

my first round of trying to compile samba 4.2 from source in an lxc container. Host OS is ubuntu 14.04 lts, and lxc template was the ubuntu template. This is a privileged container. good news, is the container seems to function well. Bad news is missing dependancies. So, in tracking down depenancies, here's what I installed in to the container apt-get install python apt-get install

Thank you for the excellent advice. so an lxc container should be a privilege vm. Do containers share the same file system like a BSD chroot jail? Or do they have a virtual disk image like vmware or virtual box? Sorry to be dense here. If you know of any good tutorials on making lxc containers, I'd like to read them. My thinking was that I would make an lxc container for the addc instance

Guys, I have a up and running Samba4 as an AD DC, along side with 3 Domain Controllers, like like: 1- Master - ubuntu-ad-1.sambadom.company.com - Ubuntu Trusty + Samba 4.1.11 + Bind9 2- Slave - ubuntu-ad-2.sambadom.company.com - Ubuntu Trusty + Samba 4.1.11 + Bind9 3- Slave - ubuntu-ad-3.sambadom.company.com - Ubuntu Trusty + Samba 4.1.11 + Bind9 4- Slave - pdwad-1.sambadom.company.com -

I currently have a samba 3.6 pdc. I would like to migrate that to a samba 4 dc. I haven't been able to google out all the 'samba migration' hits that meet my specific use case. Sorry if there is something blindingly obvious on this topic. Is it possible to set up a samba 4 dc, and have it capture the sambe 3.6 pdc info? Currently, samba uses tdbsam. (no ldap) It runs on an Centos

On 09/12/2016 01:17 PM, Jeff Sadowski via samba wrote: > This thread has me thinking about good ways to use python with web pages. > Maybe php or just flat HTML for the main page and have python work with cgi > to pass information with json's using AJAX > > Any thoughts on this? cgi is probably not what you want to do I doubt you want to make things complex by mixing php and

We had a samba 4.1.9 AD DC running since July. We have 3 campuses and brought up a secondary AD at another campus. This setup seemed to be running as expected. We could see our primary AD DC authenticating requests fine. We could see the secondary AD authenticating requests as well at our second campus. Then we started experiencing bandwidth issues between our campuses. Our metro-etherlink

Hello everyone I trying find what it happens on my Samba AD servers especially with shared spreadsheets, my personal opinion this feature on Excel is crap and unreliable but many people use it, how does Samba currently behave with this ? Is someone experienced any problem with this ? Frequently happens changes made by other user are lost the spreadsheet opens as read only , the shares are all

I went through the upgrade process describe here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba after grabbing the samba 4.1.13 source I configured, make and make installed the new source over the top of my existing 4.1.9 code. I expected that the install would copy over the top of existing python and binaries but this seems to not be the case. My first clue was running bin/samba-tool dbcheck

Hi, Sorry am new, so dont know if this is the right place to ask this question. Microsoft recently released a security update( KB 3161949) that disables netbios connection outside the local subnet. I have been using Samba 3.0.28 and since the name resolution doesn't happen after installing the patch, I cant connect to my shares anymore. If someone is using Linux samba4, can you please let

Hello, We're using Samba 4.1.11 as domain controllers and over the past two weeks I've run into several issues with unrelated Windows software, the problems of which all point to Kerberos authentication and SPNs as being somehow involved. If there are many more issues it might start to get politically difficult *not* to blame the DCs, and I don't want to point fingers at Samba. Are

Hi all. I am running Debian jessie server with Samba, which has joined the Active Directory domain. The domain controllers are Windows Server 2012 R2. After I upgraded Samba version from 4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2 to 4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u2, I'm facing the problem that I can't access Samba share by NetBIOS Aliases or IP Address. The Samba's NetBIOS name is mysamba, and I can access by

I want to have samba be the back end provider for authentication to a radius server. I found https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD and wanted to see if this is 'current' and works with samba 4.1.8 -- or if anyone is using it. I want to use RADIUS authentication on a firewall and have Samba be the source for the user accounts. I am using a pfsense firewall.