similar to: CDTB On Samba 4.1.12 As Member files server.

Dear All, Need some help as I was trying to follow the guide below. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC Until the steps of ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid and my ldbsearch reply with such a result. ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/acl.so : /usr/lib64/ldb/libreplace.so: version

Hi, I am setting up a two node Samba cluster with CTDB in AWS in two different subnets. All IP ports are open between these two subnets. I am initially forming the Samba cluster with one node, then will add the second node after startup of CTDB. I am not using public_addresses for CTDB due to AWS not supporting VIP's. I am using 64bit Amazon Linux with two NICs defined, eth0 as the

Dear All, Any suggestion to the message below? Thank You. amtbsrv02 ~ # samba-tool domain join amtb-workgroup DC -Uadministrator --realm=KL01.AMTB-M.ORG.MY --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Finding a writeable DC for domain 'amtb-workgroup' Found DC amtbserver.kl01.amtb-m.org.my Password for [AMTB-WORKGROUP\administrator]: workgroup is AMTB-WORKGROUP realm is kl01.amtb-m.org.my checking

Dear All, I've some strange entry on my getent as shown below. It seem that There are some strange value UID/GID 4294967295 <-- what number is this? I get this info from my Domain member which serving as a files server. Also some different GID from Samba AD DC E.g wbinfo from AD DC (default configuration after classical migratation) --> AD DC have no winbind configuration. wbinfo

Dear All, Can help to advise if there are any name planing for dns? e.g: I've a domain amtb-m.org should my samba4 server be ad.amtb-m.org? OR should I create another non-reachable internal domain e.g: ad.amtb-m.lan For them? What is the benefit on this or that? Any documentation about that? Thank you.

Dear All, I was doing my sql server migration and found some strand dns input... Under host -l The mysqlsrv was with the following ip.(Haproxy not done yet will do it later when fixed this) mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.14 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.28 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.32 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address

Dear All, I've been upgrade from 3.6.x to 4.1.x (Member server) All Win 7 Pro 64. While in 3.6.x there is no such report on the issue,just people complain about the slowness While in 4.1.x there are random report on this issue not everyone but more to a particular person... That seem to be happening from 4.1.6, 4.1.11 and 4.1.12 And I've really no idea why or how. Any suggestion to

Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I'm new to dovecot and have been using sinces Fedora Core 1 release. My setup is as below. Server : dovecot Imap Maildir (was from courier-imap) (v 0.99.10 from fedora) Client : Mozilla mail 1.5 (rpm from www.mozilla.org with some additional patch to work with fedora) The Problem is like this. When the Maildir is in this format

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

Hello, I've got a two node CTDB/Samba cluster that I'm having trouble with trying to add back a node after having to do an OS reload on it. The servers are running CTDB 2.5.1 and Samba 4.1.4 on AIX 7.1 TL2. The Samba CTDB databases and Samba service work fine from the node that was not reloaded. The rebuilt node is failing to re-add itself to the cluster. I'm looking for

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

Dear All, Anyone have any hints on bugs affecting samba 4.1.11 acting as a member server? I've some complain about Office 2013/365 They said that network share are not available and force to exit and documentation recovery are not possible. (But as I can see the network are still working fine...) The same configuration on samba 3.6.x are working without problem. Below are my configuration

Dear All, Need some advise on a Missing DNS entry I've a missing DNS entry where it will now show on the RAST tools but still it can be query... I try ldbedit and it show below Do you think I should delete this record and recreate it again? or there is a better way. Thank You Regards, Min Wai ldbedit -e nano -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb --show-binary --cross-ncs -b

There is a 3 nodes ctdb cluster is running. When one of 3 nodes is powered down, lots of logs will be wrote to log.ctdb. node1: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414369 ctdbd[10129]: Recovery has started 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414944 ctdbd[10129]: connect() failed, errno=111 2018/09/04 04:35:06.415076 ctdbd[10129]: Unable to run startrecovery event node2: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:09.412368

My ctdb version is 4.17.7 Hello, everyone. My ctdb cluster configuration is correct and the cluster is healthy before operation. My cluster has three nodes, namely host-192-168-34-164, host-192-168-34-165, and host-192-168-34-166. And the node host-192-168-34-164 is the leader before operation. I conducted network oscillation testing on node host-192-168-34-164?I down the interface of private

Greeting, I've been using samba quite sometime, on the old server, I can retrive the user list for share-level access. When I migrate them all to the new server this function is not working any more. Anyone know what I am talking? Thank You p.s I've try to upgrade and downgrade samba, and it is mot working at all, it that my samba setting problem or it is related to other software.

Greeting, I've been using samba quite sometime, on the old server, I can retrive the user list for share-level access. When I migrate them all to the new server this function is not working any more. Anyone know what I am talking? Thank You p.s I've try to upgrade and downgrade samba, and it is mot working at all, it that my samba setting problem or it is related to other software.

Hi, That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-) Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Hello Sébastien Le Ray, > > The PC reply the following... > > The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user > name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: > a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greeting, ~ I've setup my Red Hat 7.3 With samba 2.2.5 to be a PDC. Which at the same time, I'm having the same problem like *problems on windows part <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103675771200004&r=1&w=2>*. Accessing from windows to Linux always not a problem. But I'm having a problem to access it reverse. (from Linux