similar to: ntvfs handler = cifs, CIFS-Proxy

Hello dear list, I need help with authentication configuration on samba. It is a little bit special ... We have a Linux-Server with all users/groups local configured. (nsswitch.conf points to passwd and groups) We have ONE share configured and under this shared folder are located separated project folders. On each project folder are set posix ACLs with two groups for read only and write

I have been trying to mount a windows file share so I can use it for remote storage particularly for my Deki Wiki attachments. Anyway, I seem to have a mount established by doing the following. 1. Added following line to /etc/fstab //fs01/wikidata /var/www/dekiwiki/attachments cifs user,uid=500,rw,suid,username=wikisvcacct,password=testpwd,domain=corporate 2. Then ran following command to

Hi you all I? getting the following error when trying to upgrade a samba 3 to 4 ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap server ldap://10.21.28.229 as "cn=administrator,dc=espmg,dc=lan" failed to bind to server ldap://10.21.28.229 with dn="cn=administrator,dc=espmg,dc=lan" Error: Invalid credentials (unknown) Connection to LDAP server failed for the 1 try!

-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: miranda <miranda at prodemge.gov.br> To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba3 -> Samba4 migration Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:21:09 -0300 Sorry , here i go : Original samba3 environment : root at centaurus:~# cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 \n \l root at centaurus:~# smbd -V Version 3.2.5 backend

Hi Meike, As far as I understood you are using ldapsam only when Samba is running as AD domain controller. And when Samba is running as AD DC, all user stuffs go to AD and so ldapsam. In the configuration you described I expect your users are existing twice: once in /etc/passwd as Linux users and once in Samba TDB as Samba users. As there is work to do to the change you speak about, why not

Hi, I am having some issues with a new server install in Singapore. Outbound calls work fine. Inbound calls are not picked up by Asterisk. Zaptel 1.2.25 and Asterisk 1.2.28 both built from source. libpri installed wctdm and zaptel load without error Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372933] Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372937]

Hello list, I am not sure if this is a bug or known already but I will describe it. I have two domain controllers running on 4.1.12/sernet which are linked together. I am using unison for bidirectional sync for the sysvol directory as described on samba's wiki, although in my opinion the problem I will describe in the following has nothing to do with the sync process. The sync occurs every

Hello, we use samba with ldap backend. All is working well. Now the user count should grow to about 3000 users in a mixed environment with PCs and terminal servers. So the most of the users typically have (more than one) sessions to different terminal servers. The smb version is (tragically) still v1 and a lot of the clients comes over a NAT gateway. To reduce the traffic to the remote ldap

Hello dear list, I have running a Samba 3 server (under SLES11) connected to an LDAP-Server and it is running well. But now, I like to migrate to Samba 4 and I've made a few tests before. The whole time I with Samba 3, I was surprised about the many ldap requests so that I thought about an additional local OpenLDAP proxy cache. But now with Samba 4 (with the same configuration like Samba 3,

Hello everyone. I joined this list because I cannot find an answer to my problem. The setup is this: I installed CentOS release 6.5 (Final) minimal version Updated all packages Added the server to the Active Directory domain as a member server using the method described here (using adcli, kerberos and sssd): http://jhrozek.livejournal.com/3581.html It worked, I tested by trying to connect through

Hello, I run samba 3.6 and I need to track problems for dedicated users. So I thought, I load at the end via include special configurations for the user separately. My question is, how does the smbd configure itself. Does smbd 1) reads the config completely and then it set the parameters in the process or 2) does smbd reads and set each parameter instantly? So can I use the following example?

Hi, I have a Samba 4 AD DC running for which I now want to create a file share on it and control permissions through windows. I provisioned the domain with this command: samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive --function-level=2008_R2 --use-ntvfs My share definition in my smb.conf is as follows: [Shared] comment = Shared Files path =

Hi, For several linux server on our network we want to allow the AD domain group called "MYDOM\Domain Admins" to login through ssh with their AD credentials. Our DC1 and DC2 are running on Debian 64bit using Samba 4.1.12/Sernet. I'm kinda confused, what exactly I need therefore. Do I need to setup a PAM_authentication as explained on that tutorial here?

Hi, Not sure exactly how I would word the subject line so appologies in advanced. We are trying to accomplish the following scenario: Location 1: PDC: fs01.loc1.example.com IP: 10.0.0.1 Location 2: SDC: fs01.loc2.example.com IP: 10.0.1.1 Clearly when we join the SDC to the PDC there is a naming conflict. The end result would be to have clients at each site resolve the fs01 name to

Hi, We are having some issues with LDAP authentication. Here is our setup PDC and LDAP(samba classic) = dc01 SambaClassic domain = stdom Member server = fs01 We migrated from TDB to LDAP. The old TDB users are able to login to the domain and access file shares without issues. Any new user created in LDAP is not able to access the shares. When trying to create shared drives for the new users

Hi, Our setup: Samba (classic) DC: cdr-dc01 Samba (classic) member server: cdr-fs01. This is also a file server AD realm: CDR.internal We migrated to AD and came across an issue with accessing shares. The shares in question worked pre-migrated. i.e using a windows machine a user was able to access that share. The share in question was locked down to just that user Post migration, we are able

Am 25.09.2018 um 12:37 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:08:00 +0200 > Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > >> Am 25.09.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:18:03 +0200 >>> Daniel Jordan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 24.09.2018 um 19:33

We had used Samba 4 alpha 17 for a long time and want to update our server now to Samba 4.0.x. The old Samba versions was using NTVFS and Samba 4.0.x is now using S3FS by default. So, what is the best practice now? Should we stay on NTVFS or should we switch to S3FS? The global part of our smb.conf looks like this: --- [global] interfaces = eth0 netbios name = PDC

Hello list, I'm stuck since 2 days and I have no clue how to troubleshoot and solve that problem. Any help really really appreciated. Scenario: ========= I am using Samba 4.1.12/sernet on DC1 (172.19.100.1) and DC2 (172.19.100.2) with default [netlogon] and [sysvol] share only. I installed an additional samba4 server with fileserving role which is called MEMBERSRV1 (172.19.100.3), which is

Hello, I've running a samba server: --------- * Samba 3.6.3 * using LDAP for users an groups part. of config: ---------- workgroup = Samba security = user ldap admin dn = uid=samba_user,cn=admin,o=company,c=net passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap01.company.net ldap suffix = cn=users,o=company,c=net ldap user suffix = cn=accounts