similar to: Winbind is "sticky" on one DC

Hi, we have updated our samba AD domain from 4.4.x to 4.5.x. The release notes for 4.5.0 included  "NTLMv1 authentication disabled by default". So we had to enable it to get our radius (freeradius) server working (for 802.1x). What would be the best way to change the freeradius configuration in such a way, that we can disable NTLMv1 again. The radius server is used for WLAN

It is an issue that I myself would also like to solve. I found multiple threads in samba and freeradius mailing lists. It seems that every couple of months there is question like this either here on FR mailing list and all point down to the same issue, that is: freeradius uses ntlm_auth (even when using winbind with newer freeradius versions, it also in the end uses ntlm_auth). And since

Hi, I want to know how to use ntlm_auth with ntlm-server-1 and freeradius, with the users login and password information in ldap. I have read documentation of ntlm_auth (only found the man page), docs and howtos about pptp and squid, i don't found about freeradius, and i'm experimenting with the options of ntlm_auth. I have configured freeradius+ldap+802.1X for a wireless lan, but i

I am having a problem with an Asterisk server, in that when it is receiving a call from another Asterisk server using an IAX2 trunk the phone rings for 10 ms and then there is a hungup from asterisk and then the phone rings again before another hangup. The funny thing is that after I really hang up on the calling phone it repeats this as if I am still trying to call. Any Ideas?

Hello, I am using ntlm_auth called from FreeRADIUS to authenticate users on a network with their Active Directory credentials. The problem I seem to be having is that ntlm_auth is taking longer than it should and I can't seem to get it to go faster reliably. Some background information: Users are connecting to a wireless network using 802.1x. That network sends requests to FreeRADIUS which

Hi, I?m trying to figure out how to practically use RADIUS to authenticate users. So far, I have only found documentation explaining that the idea is that users somehow magically need to authenticate against a RADIUS server via a device like a switch or a wireless access point before they are given or being denied access to a network. I understand that I have to refer to the documentation of

Chaps, I'm trying to get a radius server to authenticate to AD via the samba ntlm_auth program. I've just built samba vsn 3.0.21c with the following config parameters ./configure --with-pam --enable-socket-wrapper --with-ldapsam --with-syslog --with-ldap --with-winbind My smb.conf has global] workgroup = ADIR security = domain password server = 150.237.54.198 realm =

Hi, We are running a 3 DC samba AD domain, and use 802.1x authentication for the win10 workstations to access the wired network. We are facing the issue where, following windows updates, our windows clients keep changing back the 802.1x settings to the windows default, namely: to verify the server identity and do computer authentication only. The latter is no problem, but the first one

Hi Folks, I'm running Debian-4.0 Etch, installed last September from a DVD, and regularly updated as things arise. I have R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-11-25 r39997) installed (initially at the time of first installation of Debian, as provided by Debian), along with a variety of packages. I'd like to be able to connect to the CRAN repositories for Debian R, for updates etc. When I visit

So I have a loop with two blocks, a header (which points to return and latch) and a latch (which points to return and header). I have inserted a few new blocks, called H and F. Header now points to H and latch. Latch now points to F. H points to F. F points to Header and return. The PHI Nodes have been updated in Header accordingly, now coming from the preheader and F (instead of latch). My

Hi, I have a few remote user who use a PPTP based VPN. The server is running PoPToP (http://www.poptop.org/), and a pppd patched to support MPPE/MPPC for (some) added security. Currently, users authentication information is stored in plaintext in /etc/ppp/chap-secrets. I'd like to be able to put users into LDAP, and have ppp authenticate either directly against LDAP, or against Samba (with an

So essentially I'm adding a path inside of the loop. Is there a way to have llvm automatically create new IR and update the PHIs simply by adding a block like this and changing the DomTree? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:08 PM Subject: Updating PHI for Instruction Domination? To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu So

Not that I'm aware of. -eric On Feb 2, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Ryan Taylor wrote: > So essentially I'm adding a path inside of the loop. Is there a way to have llvm automatically create new IR and update the PHIs simply by adding a block like this and changing the DomTree? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> > Date:

Hi. Is there a 802.1x implementation (client and server) for FreeBSD -STABLE? Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Hi chaps, Since overnight, my puppetmaster has been crashing every now and then (it has crashed about 5 times this morning). We upgraded to puppet 3.2.2 about a week ago but the problems only started this morning. There was nothing in the logs so I ran it in debug mode and captured this: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/methodhelper.rb:14: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.7

Hello, everyone, I created a dense map like this: DenseMap<Loop *, int> ls; And I have a module which contains 3 functions: function F and it has a loop which is " Loop at depth 1 containing: %1<header><exiting>,%3,%5<latch> " function G and it has two loops which are " Loop at depth 1 containing: %8<header><exiting>,%10,%14<latch>

The Problem? Nowaday, SCEV called "Scalar Evolution" does only evolate instructions that has predictable operand, Constant-Based operand. such as that can evolute as a constant. otherwise we couldn't evolate it as SCEV node, evolated as SCEVUnknown. important thing that we remember is, we do not use SCEV only for Loop Deletion, which that doesn't really needed on nature loops

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200320/34cdec77/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- Hi all, I have encountered some issues with the preservation of the location of llvm.loop metadata (containing optimisation hints), and would appreciate some feedback on the issue. The IR language description states that

Hello all I need your support in a big decision in front of two alternatives related with *. I must buy an E1, in order to manage 30 channels, given this big price; or I could opt for a 15 BRIs without cost to replace the same number of channels, and the question that inmediatly emerge is : ? can asterisk manage 15 BRIs ? If yes to the latter, could posible somo guide, for instance, wich Digium

Hello, I am getting a GPG error with the ubuntu repository at the bristol UK mirror. When my source.list has this line: deb http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk/R/bin/linux/ubuntu/ intrepid/ On an "apt-get update" you get this: W: GPG error: http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk intrepid/ Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG D67FC6EAE2A11821 Vincent Goulet <vincent.goulet at