similar to: Any work on Samba service discovery in workgroups?

Le 25/10/2018 à 18:22, Giulio via samba a écrit : >> Is enabling SMBv1 on the Windows 10 side the only solution to get Linux share be visible for the Windows "Network" listing? > > Yes, it's the only way to see the samba computer in the computers' list. > > When using SMB>=2, network discovery will use a different protocol > (WSD/LLMNR) which samba

Hello, We have Samba 4.0.21 running on a Linux machine with a share configured. It doesn't show in Windows 10 "Network" listing of available shares, unless I turn on SMBv1 in the Window features (and reboot). Accessing the share by IP or hostname works, even with SMBv1 disabled on Windows 10. Windows 10 is of the build 1804. Is enabling SMBv1 on the Windows 10 side the only

Hai Harald, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Reindl Harald via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 5 maart 2019 13:18 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] getent not working after installing firewall > > > > Am 05.03.19 um 09:18 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Solution is

I tried to close everything I had open and filter as best as I could.. but left random lines in just in case it helps. 172.16.5.230 is my local machine and *.33.235 is the server. This is a slow save.. 13:48:39.852340 (60) 001F5B35DB28 Broadcast UDP - Other Ports 172.16.5.93 172.16.5.255 00:04:53.922946 293.922946 13:48:39.852605 (60) 001F5B35DB28 USC-IANA

Kirtland Air Force Base has denied approval for the use of R on its Windows network. Some of their objections seem a bit strange, but some appear to be legitimate. In particular, they have detected registry "vulnerabilities" which are detailed in the attachment. I know nothing about Windows registry vulnerabilities. If any of these issues are legitimate concerns,

Dear all, I am currently trying to use the "dlm" package for Kalman filtering. My model is very simple: Y_t = F'_t Theta_t + v_t Theta_t = G_t Theta_t-1 + w_t v_t ~ N(0,V_t) = N(0,V) w_t ~ N(0,W_t) = N(0,W) Y_ t is a univariate time series (1x1) F_t is a vector of factor returns (Kx1) Theta_t is the state vector (Kx1) G_t is the identity matrix My first

Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 27/08/20 alle 15:49: > On 27/08/2020 14:19, Piviul via samba wrote: >> >>> >>> Microsoft is enforcing more securitybut it's Microsoft that develop >>> NetBIOS and LLMNR and if it's enforcing >> security should enforce these protocols or remove them from their OS >> isn't it? > > Microsoft

On 27/08/2020 15:23, Piviul via samba wrote: > Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 27/08/20 alle 15:49: >> On 27/08/2020 14:19, Piviul via samba wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Microsoft is enforcing more securitybut it's Microsoft that develop >>>> NetBIOS and LLMNR and if it's enforcing >>> security should enforce these protocols or

Hi, I'm running 3.0.28a on Ubuntu 8.04 (their package). I've got security = ads and idmap backend = ad (smb.conf is posted below). I'm using libnss-ldap and have ldap in nsswitch.conf (also posted below) and ldap connected to the AD server. I have the drive mounted using acl and xattr_user options in fstab (acl is installed). I can connect to the share, I see in the logs that

On 4/11/2017 10:45 AM, David Holder wrote: > LLMNR, mDNS (aka Bonjour) can all provide IPv6 addresses but it might > not be possible to use them for example if the nodes involved are not > on the same link. And LLMNR is windows-only, mDNS is not supported by Windows, so the only inter-operable way is DNS? Are there any other name resolution systems? > Link local addresses should

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mgr. > Peter Tuharsky via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 20 februari 2019 10:28 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve > FQDN, only short hostname > > Well, the mystery is solved. It WAS Avahi, in a way...

Hi, I hope this hasn't already been discussed to death, but I didn't find the answer through Google. In short, my question is: how can I advertise a Samba server through UPnP/Network Discovery? I'm currently using Samba 3.2.6, but should be able to upgrade if needed. I am trying to build an IPv6-only network, for now just for testing purposes. The problem I am having is that

No, the point is.. User verfications Computer verification And Authentication. These are 3 different things. The differences, in terms. NTLM KERBEROS DNS-lookups and how this all works together. But i only type with lots of errors, this is better to read ;-) https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/windows-authentication/credentials-processes-in-windows-authentication I

It looks from str(SA) that Response IPS1 is a data.frame of class "anova", which probably cannot be coerced to vector. Maybe you can use unlist() instead of as.vector() Or something like SA[["Response IPS1"]]["as.factor(WSD)",] ## to select the first row only, even maybe with unlist() Without a better REPRODUCIBLE example, I cannot tell more (maybe some others

Apparently I missed a step somewhere! On DC01 /etc/systemd/resolved.conf says [Resolve] #DNS= #FallbackDNS= #Domains= #LLMNR=no #MulticastDNS=no #DNSSEC=no #DNSOverTLS=no #Cache=yes #DNSStubListener=yes #ReadEtcHosts=yes On DC02 it reads [Resolve] DNS=8.8.8.8 FallbackDNS=8.8.4.4 #Domains= #LLMNR=no #MulticastDNS=no DNSSEC=no #DNSOverTLS=no #Cache=yes #DNSStubListener=yes #ReadEtcHosts=yes So

Getting rid of netbios does not mean you should not configure it. You "should" configure it. And even if you disable WINS, LLMNR is still running, so you gained.. .. Nothing with disabling WINS. Just in this case make sure your NETBIOS names obey the DNS rules and https://support.microsoft.com/nl-nl/help/909264/naming-conventions-in-active-directory-for-computers-domains-sites-and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3179 Bug ID: 3179 Summary: sshd bind function and IPv6 neighbor discovery Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: ARM64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi all, At my work I`ve set up a VPN. When I connect to it, my colleagues see all the workgroups from my side of the VPN (I live on a campus with ~50 workgroups). Do you know how I block the workgroup discovery on through the VPN gateway? Is the broadcast done on a specific port? Is samba actively repeating the broadcast and their replies? Greetings Tjerk Jan

That is because.. Your not sending the DOMAIN\username but COMPUTER\username, so access denied. I know its something like that in the backgrond, but i dont code "Windows" ;-) So, this is the only part i use: net use g: \\server.fqdn.tld\share /persistent:yes /user:NT4DOM\%username% net use k: \\server.fqdn.tld\share /persistent:yes /user:ADDOM\%username% Stop using :

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Piviul via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 26 augustus 2020 14:38 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] accessing foreign AD users to NT domain > > L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto il 26/08/20 alle 11:48: > > That is because.. Your not