similar to: Rejoining a domain as a DC

Hello, I have been trying to rejoin a computer to a newly remade PDC on the same domain name using Samba 2.2.7 on RedHat 9. I get this error message everytime I try: Title: "Computer Name Changes" "The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "Quasar": Multiple connections to a server or shared resource by the same user, using more than one user name, are

Hello. We're having issues running Samba 2.2.8-a1, on Solaris 8 (SPARC) under Veritas VCS 3.5 clustering (HA active-passive). Every time we have a cluster failover (we're testing), we have to re-join the domain [ADS not NT] (e.g., 'smbpasswd -j XYZ -r XYZPDC -UAdminRightsUser%password'). Otherwise, we cannot connect to the shares, and 'wbinfo -t' returns 'Secret is

Hi list I have a query, I have a samba 3.0.21 with openldap, all my windows clients are joined to PDC. but suddenly now , all my windows clients uanble to login but when i do getent passwd on the server , i could see all my computer accounts . even when i do ldapsearch -x -b "ou=Computers,dc=msdpl,dc=com" , i could see the list of computer account names but my windows clients report

it is possible to change the name of the domain? ad.domain.local to domain.local Samba4 version 4.1.13 Thank you

Hallo When rejoining a dc to the domain I get the following error message: [2015/07/02 11:51:44.089786, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:729(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for

On 26/08/2019 13:44, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > It is interesting to see two members of the Samba Team disagree. Just because we are on the same team, this doesn't mean we will agree 100% of the time ;-) > Though I really appreciate the support provided by Rowland a lot, I definitely favor Andrew?s "If something isn't being cleaned up then that's a bug". I never

Dear Davor We receive an error message at the command "list domains" ntdsutil metadata cleanup connections connect to server <DC with fsmo roles> quit select operation target error: error at handling the input invalid syntax -> list domains But the command is correct! Am 02.07.2015 um 21:11 schrieb Davor Vusir: > You might need to do a meta data cleanup before

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:30:23 +0100 > From: Duncan Brannen <dbb@st-andrews.ac.uk> > Subject: [Samba] ldap pdc and rejoining domains > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.0.20030707171818.02689880@vulture> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > >

Hi, I want to upgrade samba 4.8.2 to samba 4.10.7. According to here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC#Rejoining_the_upgraded_DC best way is to rejoin the server after the upgrade. But also I need to upgrade the OS, in my case it means a new installation from the OS, because an upgrade is not possible, the old and the new version are to different. Can I do this the

Hello Rowland, find the answers in line. On 23/03/23 4:24 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 23/03/2023 10:21, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote: >> Hello Rowland, >> >> Find the answers to your questions & suggestions. > > Not all, where did the domain come from ? > Was it provisioned as a Samba AD domain ? > Or > Did it it start out as an

Hi, I'm resending this to the list since I cannot see it on the archive, for some reason... I recently upgraded two (running stable) systems from Debian Wheezy to Jessie. Samba version has not changed since on Wheezy I was using the one from wheezy-backports (v4.1.17), same as on jessie. These are 2 basic DCs without any additional config. Since the upgrade, every day at either at 10 PM or 8

On 23/03/2023 11:10, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > find the answers in line. > > > On 23/03/23 4:24 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 23/03/2023 10:21, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote: >>> Hello Rowland, >>> >>> Find the answers to your questions & suggestions. >> >> Not all,

Hi Jake. Thanks for the info. Where can I keep up to date on the symbolizer status? Our symbolizer is provided by the Myriad vendor and integrated into its host test environment. It doesn't do much: just look for PC string patterns and symbolize them using addr2line. Thanks, Walter On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:36 PM Jake Ehrlich <jakehehrlich at google.com> wrote: > Hey, > I

Hey, I work on fuchsia symbolizer stuff. I don't know if you guys already have an external symbolizer but I'm working on making one right now and I plan on making one backed by LLVM that can be run host-side or target-side. I'd like to contribute that back to llvm ideally. What do you guys have so far? I have a prototype in golang that just spins up an instance of llvm-symbolizer

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:29 PM Walter Lee <waltl at google.com> wrote: > Hi Kostya. Thanks for the quick feedback. I will work on addressing your > comments. > > In regard to initialization checks, I can eliminate most of them by > initializing the shadow memory very early, This will be a very good way to handle this. > but I still need to do something > in two

I have successfully installed Samba 2.2.7a as a PDC and has added the "add user script" to automatically create machine accounts. This worked very well when I added my client machine the first time. It successfully joined the domain and I was able to login as a user. I then removed the machine from the domain and put it in an unrelated workgroup and then tried to re-join the Samba

Am 30.04.2020 um 12:57 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 30/04/2020 11:44, Olaf Dreyer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I restored the last backup with the 4.11.6 setup. This is working >> fine and i can confirm that my AD is set up with a single forwarding >> zone, there is no _msdsc zone. On this 4.11.6 setup also the Windows >> DNS Tool does not complain. When

Hi Kostya. Thanks for the quick feedback. I will work on addressing your comments. In regard to initialization checks, I can eliminate most of them by initializing the shadow memory very early, but I still need to do something in two places, __asan_handle_no_return and GetFakeStackFast. Would it be ok to have guards for those two places only? Walter On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:10 PM Kostya

I'm trying to use the same hostname. The meta cleanup - I can't see the demoted controller in ADUC nor in Active Directory Sites and Services. Shall I try via ntdsutil? Regards, Kris -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of lingpanda101 via samba Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 9:09 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba]

On RAM... You chose the 32-byte shadow granularity to reduce the RAM overhead, but I am afraid this will actually increase it due to extra alignment requirements, especially if an average allocation on your typical application is small. The pointers are 32-bit, right? Given how RAM-constrained your environment is, maybe you should consider something more like HWASAN instead of ASAN.