similar to: Multicast DNS required?

mDNS is not DNS mDNS (zeroconf/avahi) ( used for .local and .lan reserved tlds ) is an apple thingy.. mDNS udp 5353 DNS tcp/udp 53. Yes, dns tcp + udp. If and dns udp package is to large it switches to tcp. got that from wiets ( the postfix developer ) So i must believe him.. wiets is great.. ( and dutch ) :-)) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba

Hi, a totally simple, but maybe totally useless question: is there some (small) possibility to theoretically turn off the dns and service resolution provided by samba/netbios and use zeroconf/dns-sd instead? I know it won't be much help for windows users, because they won't find the shares anymore, but maybe there'll be a zeroconf implementation on windows someday? greetings fabian

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 04:47:05 -0400 > Steve Ankeny <steve_a at cinergymetro.net> wrote: > > >> What about the use of 'realm = RES.LOCAL'? > > > I have given up bothering about people who are unwise enough to > use .local. It must be splattered all over the internet by now that > .local shouldn't be

Hello, Can anyone tell me my shorewall is get hacked ? or local Lan computers got Virus ? please see the following log. http://www.wilson-kwok.com/shorewall.txt Please help --------------------------------- 現在你可輕易阻擋垃圾郵件，立即使用Yahoo! Mail 你就會相信! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express

Progress... On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service > now, i'm not "pro" systemd or con systemd, i use it but i set my

Hello CentOS, I'm curious... there seems to be a couple of default firewall rules that I'm not familiar with in the CentOS 4.0 # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD

Just I missed the correct IPv6 PTR record from the DNS.                                     Ok and whats obligated for a correct working kerberos environment. Ahh.. Yes... dns A and PTR records. ;-) so one thing fixed thats ok..     The PC, ( ipconfig /all ) looks good now.     Next.. your hosts files... > my /etc/hosts: > > # IPv4 and IPv6 localhost aliases >

All, I am trying to install puppet master version 2.7.13 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, and utilize stored configs. I followed the guide here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Stored_Configuration When I run puppet --noop on one of the clients, I get the following error: err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not autoload

I'm not sure if I would not advise to use .local, sometimes it seems to be needed to make a proper location for a running domain where even .cityname cannot accomplish what you need. To be honest I don't run Avahi and will not either. Avahi and mdns are actually only designed because of of bad DNS management by system administrators and have (Apple) users use all their features, the same

Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server As said before, running on .alocal for Avahi works perfectly and mDNS is only for small networks, and setting up some proper DNS

On 7/25/19 1:10 PM, hw wrote: >> >> Configure all dns servers as primary slaves (plus 1 primary master) for >> your own domains.? I have never seen problems with resolution of local >> dns domains when the Internet was down. > > It seemed to have to do with the TTL for the local names being too > short and DNS being designed to generally query root servers rather

Good Day All I have been trying to upgrade from samba 3 to samba 4.2.1 on Ubuntu 14.4 using the sernet-samba package. the upgrade seems to work fine and the samba4 comes up correctlly, I have also run the following script to get rid of bug https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=blob_plain;f=source4/scripting/devel/chgtdcpass;h=4f5ea15a80c2862daf170a5657658a8163174f8a;hb=HEAD I am able to

Hello All, I would like to add support for advertising Samba shares (browseable ones) on the local network using Multicast DNS. Multicast DNS allows applications to query/publish network services on the local link. I would appreciate if you could all please share your thoughts on whether such support would be welcome in Samba. If you know of existing efforts in Samba to include such support

On 08/27/2015 09:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 27.08.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> mDNS? Even if you are running DHCP which provides the Nameserver >> address? > > different worlds, a DNS needs to be asked, mDNS "Bonjour provides a > general method to discover services on a local area network" meaning > your fileserver automatically

I'm not missing the point, the point is that you actually cannot tell why .local should stay local always and forever. That's my point, you don't know either as you ask yourself already, "why should I config Avahi myself ?". Indeed stay in control of your network or stay out. 2015-01-05 13:02 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 05/01/15

Sending to you without the mailinglist is on the same level as proper administration of a network ? This is new to me and I'm sure to others too. What might be new to you is that Avahi runs on the domain it finds and not what it expects. That is how the protocol works, it searches, sees the domain of the protocol and goes on. So all Avahi users in a network will run on .alocal is you set the

Am 06.08.2016 um 08:53 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:42:32 +0200 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > >> >> Am 05.08.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 04:47:05 -0400 >>> Steve Ankeny <steve_a at cinergymetro.net> wrote: >>> >>>> What about the use of 'realm =

Would it be extremely difficult to do multicast over tinc? How about reliable multicast over tinc? This would be more traffic than multicast dns, but not _necessarily_ a great deal more. It would be for syncing some information among freeipa domain controllers. Would the tinc nodes need to be in all in switch or maybe even hub mode? EthernetOverIP over tinc?

Greetings, Unbound 1.4.20 OS X 10.8.4 - Server NSD 3.2.15 I have installed 'unbound' and it works nicely on my client (test purpose) - Client is MacBook Air. I have installed NSD (will be in replacement of BIND) on said client. All is good but when i try to start NSD Error --> nsd can't bind udp socket: address already in use. Everything is configured to bind to 127.0.0.1. #

Sure there is, Install debian, follow my howto and you will have success. Just, your using an .local domain, and thats a reserved name for apples mDNS (zeroconf) And should not be used. ( same for .lan ) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Use_the_.local_Top-level_Domain_for_My_AD_DNS_Zone.3F So the info is good, thats not the problem, finding it, is. Can you post your /etc/hosts