Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "smbd doesn't start anymore"
2017 Nov 13
2
Winbind error "Could not fetch our SID - did we join?"
On 2017-11-13 12:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:05:33 +0100
> Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote:
>
>> /etc/hostname:villach-file
>> /etc/hosts:# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
>> /etc/hosts:::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
>> /etc/hosts:ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
>>
2014 Aug 11
2
Winbind question
Hi,
I successfully set up an AD DC, and now, I want to join a file server as
member in this domain.
I followed this tutorial :
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server
All works fine, my server join my AD without problem, samba starts fine
and winbind too. But when I look at my domain users, the uid/gid
returned by winbind are in the TDB range instead of the AD
2015 May 26
2
Problems with joining a second DC to AD
Gesendet:?Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 um 19:06 Uhr
Von:?"Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>
An:?samba at lists.samba.org
Betreff:?Re: [Samba] [SAMBA] Problems with joining a second DC to AD
On 21/05/15 17:41, Stephan Mattecka wrote:
> Hi Rowland and Louis,
>
> I did try both of your suggestions, but nothing changed on DC2. I did check all the DNS-settings
2019 May 31
2
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 11:40 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Andreas Reichel wrote:
> > > > When adding me as the user with 'smbpasswd -a andreas', and entering a password,
> > > > no LANMAN hash is generated. The generated smbpasswd entry always contains 32 X as the first hash.
> > > >
> > >
2015 May 26
2
Problems with joining a second DC to AD
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Mai 2015 um 13:31 Uhr
> Von: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>
> An: "Stephan Mattecka" <ste-fun_s at gmx.de>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [Samba] [SAMBA] Problems with joining a second DC to AD
>
> On 26/05/15 10:42, Stephan Mattecka wrote:
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai
2014 Aug 14
2
Problem with roaming profiles (always synced but never read)
Hi,
I come to find new ideas about a problem which is blocking me since many
days....
I've an AD DC on Samba 4.1.11, and a file server (on Samba 4.1.11 too)
member of the domain. They works fine (apparently).
I've a Win7 Enterprise x64 client, joined to the domain.
I've created a new user 'foo' to test openning session.
When I log for the first time, my user get a local
2015 May 21
2
Problems with joining a second DC to AD
Hi Rowland and Louis,
?
I did try both of your suggestions, but nothing changed on DC2. I did check all the DNS-settings (resolv.conf and hosts), so that I don't think that this is the reason for the error-messages.
?
I did set the loglevel to 5 and will try to find the differences between both machines. These are just virtual machines to test the building of a AD-Domain before using it in
2014 Aug 12
2
Strange behaviour with "force user" parameter
Hi,
I'm in trouble with a share, I found that the problem comes from the
"force user" parameter in my smb.conf.
This is my smb.conf :
[global]
netbios name = filserv
workgroup = SAMDOM
security = ADS
realm = SAMDOM.FR
encrypt passwords = yes
log level = 8
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
idmap config *:backend = tdb
idmap config *:range =
2014 Jul 28
1
NFSv4 + Kerberos understanding
Hi,
I've a SAMBA4 AD Domain that works nicely. All my W7 joined perfectly
and all my Linux clients authenticates against kerberos part of SAMBA.
All work perfectly, now I'm trying to secure my NFS mounts by using
kerberos part of SAMBA.
My NFS server works and I can mount NFS4 exports without kerberos (and
without problem ;-) ), but when I want to mount a gss/krb5 export on a
linux
2017 Jun 29
1
samba-tool SIGSEGV
Hi,
Not sure if I should post in samba-technical or just samba list. Please advise.
Back in February I was trying to do a samba-tool classicupgrade but kept getting SIGSEGV:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-February/206409.html
I didn't progress much after that.
This week I've compiled samba-4.6.5 and installed that. Following the HOW-TO for classic upgrade
2010 Oct 05
1
Win7 cannot net use z: Samba share
Hi all
The symptom is:
> C:\Windows\system32>net USE z: \\10.10.23.219\share /USER:SMBUSER
> [password]
>
> System error 1326 has occurred.
>
My situation
I am using VirtualBox. Windows 7 Home is the host. Fedora 13 is the guest.
My goal is to cause the Fedora guest to expose an smb share to the Win 7
host and have the Win 7 host mount the share as a drive.
My procedure:
2016 Aug 03
4
FW: kerberos nfs4's principals and root access
You need for the apache keytab something like
Alias /webmail /usr/share/webmail
#
<Directory /usr/share/ webmail >
AuthType Kerberos
AuthName "Kerberos Login"
KrbMethodNegotiate On
KrbMethodK5Passwd Off
KrbServiceName HTTP
KrbAuthRealms EXAMPLE.COM
Krb5KeyTab /etc/httpd/conf/keytab
require valid-user
</Directory>
chmod 400 /etc/httpd/conf/keytab
chown
2009 Oct 02
4
smbd Crash
Hi,
I don't stop to have problems with samba :s ...
Now after having workaround the bug of scanning all LDAP users for each
connexion... smbd crash very often.
In some workstation log files i can see something like this :
...
[2009/10/01 16:28:12, 2] smbd/open.c:580(open_file)
baala opened file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal read=No
write=No (numopen=20)
[2009/10/01
2009 Oct 01
2
PDC witch LDAP and machine account lookup
Hey all,
i do have the following problem: i set up a PDC with Samba with an LDAP
backend. Everything works fine but the machine account lookup. If i try to
logon to the domain i have to create the machine account in
ou=People,dc=testing,dc=de. Everything works fine with this. But if i create
the machine account in ou=Computers,dc=testing,dc=de and change all suffixes
according to this the
2016 Aug 03
1
FW: kerberos nfs4's principals and root access
If not done, add the server to the AD.
Add the host and nfs to the COMPUTERNAME($) account.
And use winbind to refresh the keytab.
Stop samba,
remove the keytab, create the new with the new SPN's in it,
start samba.
And Use the second keytab for apache with only http as upn in it.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at
2012 Apr 17
0
samba 3.6.4 smbd dies on solaris 10 sparc64
Hi list,
Disclaimer: not a subscriber, not a samba expert, just trying to get samba
running on a Solaris 10 system.
We build samba 3.6.4 from source for various platforms. We link against our
own builds of cyrus-sasl 2.1.23, openldap 2.4.23, and openssl 1.0.0h. On
Solaris we also compile against krb5-1.10.1. Builds are done with GNU tools
whenever possible (gcc/ld/make).
The build host, as well
2016 Aug 02
3
FW: kerberos nfs4's principals and root access
It's ok
So, if I create a httpuser and an httpgroup in my AD and use these at
owner and group for my apache2 daemon, this one could access to userdirs
(while permissions granting it) ? But I need to cron 'kinit' to keep
valid ticket... ?
My local root user always can't access to the share, but my other
problem seems to be resolved.
Thanks
Le 02/08/2016 à 16:37, Rowland
2013 Sep 06
1
Problem with kerberos and GPO
Hi,
I have problem with GPO and dns/kerberos resolution
I do a samba -i -d3 to a log file and started on client: gpupdate /force:
lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /srv/samba/etc/smb.conf
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file
"/srv/samba/etc/smb.conf"
samba version 4.1.0rc2 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013
...
ldb_wrap open of
2010 Dec 06
1
Share Problem
Hi,
Like explained in my precedent mail (Permission Problems), I want to do
a share (called partinfo) with basic behaviour :
* everybody in group 'info' can create file into the share.
* everybody in group 'info' can modify file into the share (not only
owned files)
* only owner of a file can delete it/rename it !
I put a Sticky Bit on my share folder so I've got :
2016 Aug 02
2
FW: kerberos nfs4's principals and root access
** I truncate my initial mail below for size reason **
I've tried your tips but nothing better.... AD users can still accessing
share (ouf !!), but local users not more.
I can't find where it blocks....
Thanks for your help Louis,
Greetz,
Bruno
Le 02/08/2016 à 15:33, L.P.H. van Belle a écrit :
>
> You keep 2 ranges.
>
> One for the “local (linux) users”
>
>