similar to: Samba 4 dns-resolv-prob with different subnets

Hello all, The prob is solved. The dns-answer only seemed to come from the asked nameserver. Between the two endpoints of the vpn the gateways have a transparent dns-proxy which forwarded my dns-request not the wanted dns-server but sent not-found-answers pretending to be the intended ns. Not easy to find such a pitfall :( Thanks again, -Peter -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peter

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:01:52 +0100 "peter.grotz--- via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks Rowland for your answer. > > these are sernet-packages from their subscription. > > There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs > (dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on > centos 7) > >

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:43:09 +0100 peter grotz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I forgot: this is samba 4.9.3 on centos 7 Where did you get Samba 4.9.3 from ? > > Thanks > > > Hello, > > I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join > I get the following: What are the other DC(s) ? Rowland

Hello, I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join I get the following: [root at dc-12 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -Uadministrator --server=dc-11 Password for [OBEL\administrator]: workgroup is OBEL realm is obel.lan Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding

> On 21/04/15 09:17, Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > > > > > samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot > > of time to release their new packages. > > > > But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there be > > another fine release? > > > >

Hallo, samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot of time to release their new packages. But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there be another fine release? In great expectation of a fine new sernet-samba-package-release -Peter

Hello Louis, > Datum: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:17:44 +0200 > Von: "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> > An: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 dns-resolv-prob with different subnets > pleast post your > /etc/hosts on dc-01: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.0.101 dc-01

Hallo, we have two dcs in one domain which is located in separate subnets. These subnets are connected by a routed vpn. How must I handle fsmo roles when one of these dcs fails and will maybe be repaired and reconnected? A transfer of the fsmo roles is not possible until the dc is repaired, so should the fsmos be seized from the other dc? Can anybody give me a hint how to handle this

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages are online :-) Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on > jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. > > > Gr, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >>

Hallo and Merry Christmas to all! I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2. The repo isn?t available any more, so can anybody help me here? Thanks in advance! Peter

Thanks Rowloand for the hint! I installed sernet-samba 4.7 and give it a try. Now I get: [root at dc-12 1]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC --realm=obel.lan -Uadministrator Finding a writeable DC for domain 'obel.lan' Found DC dc-11.obel.lan Password for [OBEL\administrator]: workgroup is OBEL realm is obel.lan Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding

may I extend the issue with some strange behaviour? Look here: installing the sernet 4.7 as mentioned above I can´t join the domain in a regular way. ONLY it works when I asked BOTH of the working DCs with 4.9.3 before I try without explicit naming of a server... ^^ Follow me here: [root at dc-02 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -U"OBEL\administrator" --realm=obel.lan

All, I hope you can help, I've searched the archives and found some reference to some file corruption problems, but with earlier versions of Samba to what I am running. Having replaced my old NT4 server at home (after it's boot disk died) with Samba running on SuSE 8.0 I've had 3 instances of files becoming corrupted when saved from my wife's Windows 2000 PC. What happens is

Thanks Rowland for your answer. these are sernet-packages from their subscription. There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs (dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on centos 7) dc-11 has all fsmo. joining with the old dc-01 and dc-02 doesn´t even work. dc-01 joins but gives me this: Deleted

Yello I use (or try to use :) wine 20010824 (installed from MDK rpm). If I try to run a app i get: #wine notepad.exe Warning: could not find wine config [Drive x] entry for current working directory /home/enrique/.wine; starting in windows directory. Loading required GL library /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 And nothing more happens. My system conf: Linux Mandrake 8.0, kernel 2.4.8-24mdk, XFree

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=562 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-04-27 02:41 MET ------- I asked you to post this with additional information to the mailinglists, so pleast at least include the information here or post it to the lists as I asked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -------

Hi all, I want to migrate from 2.2.6 to 3.0.10 (with ldap). Is it possible to change the SID in the ntuser.dat on the server-saved profile? -Peter

To the samba-people when can we expect a stable 3.0 release? I?ve heard of the massive changes using ldap between 2.2.7a and 3.0. Does it make sense to wait for 3.0 to change my systems to ldap? Thanks! Peter

Hi List, please consider the following scenario: (and pleast forgive if I have not googled enough but I was unsuccessful to find an app what exactly does what I want) machine A (office) is, where most file changes/downloads etc happen. and it has limited internet access (only proxy possible) Machine B (home) has low bandwidth, is NATed etc. So I would like to use an USB

With the increased number of "brute force" login attempts against port 22, I am concerned that an intruder may actually stumble accross a valid user/pass combination. To combat this, I would like to request an sshd_config option that would cause the running sshd parent process to keep track of login failures by IP address. If there are more than X number of login failures for a