similar to: dnsbackend options question

I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with Bind9_DLZ. I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software setup. First machine is working fine. At the moment this (second) machine is not joined to the other (until I get Bind running.) I have searched log complaints. Compared settings between the two machines and despite bind running on the first one,

On 2016-10-16 12:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:38:00 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with >> Bind9_DLZ. >> >> I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software >> setup. First machine is

I have multiple Win2k3 R2 servers and one Samba4 (Version 4.1.6-Ubuntu) additional dc. Active Directory Domains and Trusts is reporting this. To update the domain functional level, the domain controllers in the domain must be running the appropriate version of windows. Domain Name wuteveh.local Current domain functional level Windows 2000 native The following domain controllers are

Ah, ok, my thats where its different here. My setup is AD-DNS => eth0 Server_split_DNS (Proxy) eth1 => internet > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Joachim Lindenberg [mailto:samba at lindenberg.one] > Verzonden: dinsdag 30 juli 2019 10:44 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] split horizon and authoritative answers..?

On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of >> dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because >> systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - >>

On 11/28/2017 9:02 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:37:22 -0600 > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 >>> Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Last week,

Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - due to apparmor failures with bind_dlz. Here is the initial journalctl results: Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc named[16080]: starting BIND 9.10.6-Debian <id:9d1ea0b> -f -u bind Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc

On 11/28/2017 11:11 AM, Robert Wooden wrote: > Dale, > > Been using Ubuntu server for years in my AD. Discovered a long time > ago that apparmor is not needed for a server. (Someone is probably > going to argue the other that is should be but . . .) > > Do not quote me but, I have read that AppArmor is intended more for a > desktop environment. I have always disabled and

Hello dear Samba Group i try to install from repository Samba 4.10 on Ubuntu 19.04 - 64b with local BIND-9.11 Server. Lookop and Revers runnig .... after re-run Bind appair the following Error. /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_11.so failed to map segment from shared object "named[7726]: dlz_dlopen failed to open library

Hai,  Normaly i kick in sooner but im in bed fit by flu. :-(  You have to add the bind paths to the apparmor profile, or disable apparmor in total, just dont remove it, should work also. debian wiki or ubuntu wiki shows how.  But why are you using buster, imo really not safe,  if you wany a 4.7 for stretch use my apt. When im better i can have a look into your problem more closely. greetz

Hai, 1) apparmor, disable it, and try again, so we can confirm if its an apparmor settings. 2) winbind is starting from systemd while as AD-DC you should disable that. - stop the member parts of samba and systemd. systemctl stop winbind smbd nmbd samba systemctl disable winbind smbd nmbd samba systemctl mask winbind smbd nmbd samba - enable the samba-ad-dc part in systemd.

Hi Rowland, I get the same error messages even with the following smb.conf, generated by the migration process. [global] workgroup = LIN realm = LIN.COM netbios name = LINSERVER01 server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate idmap_ldb:use

Samba4 latest git, Ubuntu 11.10, bind9.9.0 Hi I have dynamic updates working but I've had to tweak apparmor: sudo aa-complain /etc/aparmor.d/usr.sbin.named This floods the logs with allow messages. I can remove this by: /etc/init.d/apparmor teardown Not ideal. Can I have bind9, s4 and apparmor at the same time? Thanks, Steve

> From: Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Date: 05/14/2019 02:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Workstations cannot update DNS > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > On 14/05/2019 21:36, Durwin via samba wrote: > > I am trying to get DDNS working, so workstations can update their ip.

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:27:56 +0200 Arcadie Cracan <arcadiec at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Rowland, > > I have commented out the 'idmap config' options, nothing changed. > Here are my bind9 configs: > > /etc/bind/named.conf: Nothing wrong there > > /etc/bind/named.conf.options: > options { > directory "/var/cache/bind"; >

Hi Rowland, Thank you. Yes to the first point. We are using Bind9 but to continue using it is not necessarily set in stone. If using Samba Internal DNS makes more sense then we can do that too. The question is do we need to do dns-upgrade and use Internal DNS, pre-migration? Then use internal dns during the classic migration? Also, I assume the bind9 service will have to stopped if infact we

On 07/25/2019 10:36 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > This probably means that you do not have the libnss-winbind links > and/or /etc/nsswitch.conf set up to return AD users (this is not > required on a DC, only if you want to use the DC as a fileserver). Not using it as a file server.? So back to the original question which is why am I getting a serverinfo error: athena:~#

I am trying to get DDNS working, so workstations can update their ip. The domain is msi.mycompany.com The DC server works, as well as group policies. I set rights to these files > chgrp bind /var/lib/samba/private/ > chmod 750 /var/lib/samba/private/ > chgrp bind /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab > chmod 640 /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab journalctl shows this. May 14 14:22:32

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:02:10 +0000 Praveen Ghimire <PGhimire at sundata.com.au> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Following the > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC, > ran some tests migrating from Bind9 to Samba Internal with the > following results > > Stopped the BIND, Samba-AD-DC services > > samba_upgradedns

Hai, @Rowland. Yes yes, you did say you hate systemd. :-) I had a hard(er)time on this one also but i got passed it. ;-) But you and everybody else on the list, please review this setup. And a very big thank you Rowland for the start of it. This should be a good base to start with as howto for ubuntu 18.04 systemd based. Any suggestion additions please add them, below is also the order