similar to: CTDB 50.samba: ERROR: smb.conf cache create failed

ctdb 2.5.3 dual node file server with 4.1.9 serving AD domain Hi We have enabled the script at: /etc/cdb/events.d/50.samba but when we are the enabled node, it starts not only smbd but also nmbd. This doesn't make sense in an AD domain. I've tried disabling nmbd starting under openSUSE's systemd but ctdb overrides that, I've had a look at the script but can't decipher the bit

Ubuntu 14.04. 2 node ctdb in an 4.1.11 AD domain with 4.1.11 member servers on each node. winbindd is present but nss and pam are controlled by sssd. All OK, except that the event script which starts samba is not working. smb.conf [global] workgroup = ALTEA realm = ALTEA.SITE security = ADS kerberos method = secrets and keytab netbios name = SMBCLUSTER clustering = Yes ctdbd socket =

Ubuntu 14.04, ctdb 2.5.3, samba 4.1.11. CTDB is working with IP takeover between the 2 nodes. The machine is joined to the domain. Any help with the following errors would be most gratefully received. 1. connect to socket error: ctdb status 2014/08/16 15:32:03.248034 [23255]: client/ctdb_client.c:267 Failed to connect client socket to daemon. Errno:Connection refused(111) common/cmdline.c:156

Hi We have installed a two node ctdb cluster using glusterfs it works fine, but we want that the users be able to find the server in the network section of windows explorer. We are using fedora 23 and nmb doesn't start with ctdb i tried the following change in /etc/ctdb/events.d/50.samba *) # Use redhat style as default:

Hi there, I use Samba 4.9 since its releaseday and also had some troubles first due to the lack of informations in the wiki. Anyways... after some try & error i got it working and since i run the Cluster (non-production environment) had no errors except CTDBs monitoring of the Samba process did'nt work as i would expect it (RPC-Server was dead but CTDB did'nt complain and "ctdb

>> You don't have smbd/smbstatus installed from a package in /usr/ and the >> other left over in /usr/local/, or similar? In that case, they could >> be getting their configurations from different places... >> >> peace & happiness, >> martin > Hi Martin, > > No, nothing like that. Installing the Sernet packages obsoletes the > distro ones.

I have been working on a CTDB cluster on and off for a while now. I had it working great for a while. THen I decide dthat I wanted to change the configuration of my replicated volumes. I changed my DRBD configuration to match my desired configuration. Now I can get the CTDB to work quite right. I am able to join the cluster to the domain without issues. I can also list my ad users and groups using

Hello all, I've some CTDB issue which I'm not sure where to start... I follow this guide by steve which is nice. The different on what have is that I don't have drbd running... Also I've 4 x GE which is all Connected to a switch with different ip but same subnet This is suppose to load balance the traffic as under samba dns, they all have the same name. I'm only planing 3

> Interestingly I have a setup here for testing for rollout of S4 AD. > The file servers are in an AD domain and are running Sernet 4.4.5, so > one version older than production. I have tested the locking on these > and it works. The only difference I can find that in prod, > /etc/default/sernet-samba-ctdb contains these lines: > > CTDB_MANAGES_SAMBA=yes >

I suggest have a look in : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 i think that wil help you. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Martin Schwenke > via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 21 oktober 2016 11:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] CTDB and locking issues in

Hi Alex, On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:28:38 +0100, Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > It appears that samba is still using local databases and not clustered > > databases. > > > > What does "ctdb getdbmap" list? Is locking.tdb a clustered database? > > Do you have "clustering = yes" in smb.conf on all the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm trying to bring up a three node cluster using CTDB and SAMBA4 on a GlusterFS clustered file system. The filesystem itself seems to be working just fine, but CTDB doesn't seem happy. If I start a single node up: service ctdb start After about 10 seconds it becomes healthy, starts SAMBA and takes over all 3 IP addresses. However,

Hi all, I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on one of the servers, and compiled and installed samba 4.7.1 with: ./configure --with-cluster-support --with-shared-modules=idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad,vfs_glusterfs --with-systemd Trying to start ctdb on the updated server fails with "

Highlights ======= * Support for Samba 4.0.0 To use CTDB 2.1 with Samba 3.x, enable Samba3AvoidDeadlocks tunable * Set CTDB_BASE in eventscripts, so they can be run easily * Clean up orphaned interfaces * Do not restart NFS on reconfigure event * Fix RSN based recovery of persistent databases to avoid corruption * Re-factor and separate IP allocation algorithms Reporting bugs &

Hi, we run ctdb with samba on SLES11. It was running for some month ok but after an update of the system and ctdb it fails to run. I tried to setup a new ctdb setup on two other nodes and it still fails with the same error. After startup the status is: > ctdb status > Number of nodes:2 > pnn:0 10.94.43.7 DISABLED > pnn:1 10.94.43.8 DISABLED (THIS NODE) >

====================================================== "Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75." Benjamin Franklin ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. Changes since 4.5.1: -------------------- o Michael Adam <obnox at

====================================================== "Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75." Benjamin Franklin ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. Changes since 4.5.1: -------------------- o Michael Adam <obnox at

It is just a wrapper around select(2). Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> --- extras/mini-os/include/posix/poll.h | 1 + extras/mini-os/lib/sys.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 extras/mini-os/include/posix/poll.h diff --git a/extras/mini-os/include/posix/poll.h

Hi, yesterday i tried to setup Dovecot with Solr (3.6.2) + Tika (1.8) for FTS. i used a fresh Debian 8.0 system in the beginning with Dovecot 2.2.13 from the Debian repository. After i got some issues with Tika/Dovecot and i read on the mailinglist that these problems where fixed in 2.2.14+, so i tried 2.2.18. With 2.2.18 i get panics with big (ok... huge) attachments. Most mailboxes (and their

Hello I received an error like the following. I have two servers running on KVM. One is the database and the other is the application server. How can I solve this problem? ---: error: KERNEL: /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64/vmlinux DUMPFILE: vmcore [PARTIAL DUMP] CPUS: 12 DATE: Sun Jan 5 03:28:07 2020 UPTIME: 102 days, 10:45:21 LOAD