similar to: vfs_acl_xattr doesn't work unless all the inherit and map inherit acl parameters are set to yes, but want to set inherit owner = no

I'm about to do some testing with a an OSX 10.9 client connected to sernet samba 4.1.5 to see what things work and don't both from the finder and from the terminal with unix extensions = yes and no. Does anyone know of any show stopping issues that occur with unix extensions = yes and the latest samba (or 3.6.x, or 4.0.x a) and the latest OSX (or latest update with 10.7 & 10.8)?

Hi, Running samba sernet 4.1.6-7, I've noticed the load avg slowly / steadily creeping up (.e.g > 100). I'm now noticing that several smbd processes are at 100%. I don't actually notice that much bandwidth usage on the system (e.g. iptraf/iftop). Any idea what's causing this? Restarting smbd helps for a few days, but then the high load avg returns. Thanks, Sabuj

Hi, I've been migrating data from an old striped 3.0.x gluster install to a 3.3 beta install. I copied all the data to a regular XFS partition (4K blocksize) from the old gluster striped volume and it totaled 9.2TB. With the old setup I used the following option in a "volume stripe" block in the configuration file in a client : volume stripe type cluster/stripe option

Hi, Anyone know if the 1024 char limit for auth.allow still exists in the latest production version (seems to be there in 3.2.5). Also anyone know if the new versions check if auth.allow has been updated without having to restart glusterd? Is there anyway to restart glusterd without killing it and restarting the process, is kill -1 (HUP) possible with it (also with the version i'm running?)

In IRC today, someone who was hitting that same IB performance ceiling that occasionally gets reported had this to say [11:50] <nissim> first, I ran fedora which is not supported by Mellanox OFED distro [11:50] <nissim> so I moved to CentOS 6.3 [11:51] <nissim> next I removed all distibution related infiniband rpms and build the latest OFED package [11:52] <nissim>

Hi, I've got this strange problem where a striped endpoint will crash when I try to use cp to copy files off of it but not when I use rsync to copy files off: [user at gluster5 user]$ cp -r Python-2.6.4/ ~/tmp/ cp: reading `Python-2.6.4/Lib/lib2to3/tests/data/fixers/myfixes/__init__.py': Software caused connection abort cp: closing

Hi all, We're running gpfs 3.5.0.12 (5 total nsds & quorum servers, 2 nsds running samba), sernet-samba 4.1.4-7, and ctdb 1.0.114.7-1 and trying to get transparent failover to work from a windows 8 client. We have ctdb failover working, i.e. if I run mmshutdown on one of the nodes the IPs failover in a few seconds after the GPFS mount is unmounted. For our transparent failover test, I

Hi all, I have two rhel 6.3 servers running sernet samba 4.1.4-7 with winbind connecting to AD. They're also running ctdb. For some very strange reason I can't get one specific AD group to show up in the output of "id username" or the gid of that group to show up in "wbinfo -r username" for the user on one of the servers but it shows up fine on the other. The strange

Hi all, Does anyone have vfs_shadow_copy2 working with an alternate snapshot directory format? My snapshots look like this : drwxr-xr-x 55 root root 32768 Jan 10 12:37 20140113_12:00 drwxr-xr-x 55 root root 32768 Jan 10 12:37 20140114_12:00 drwxr-xr-x 55 root root 32768 Jan 10 12:37 20140115_12:00 drwxr-xr-x 55 root root 32768 Jan 10 12:37 20140116_12:00 drwxr-xr-x 55 root root 32768 Jan 10

Hi, Why does mkfs.ocfs2 take so long compared to gfs2 (pretty fast iirc), xfs (almost instantaneous), or ext3 (slow but still ok)? I'm using: # mkfs.ocfs2 -F -b 4k -C 4k -L san1 -T mail /dev/vg/san1 mkfs.ocfs2 1.3.9 Overwriting existing ocfs2 partition. WARNING: Cluster check disabled. Proceed (y/N): y Filesystem Type of mail Filesystem label=san1 Block size=4096 (bits=12) Cluster size=4096

Hi, I noticed that smbcontrol smbd reload-config or service smbd reload doesn't reload include files. Is there anyway to get a reload to reload files that have been included from the main smb.conf ? Otherwise it only looks like restart works, but that causes connections to reset, even in a ctdb/clustered environment . The only other option it looks like is to just put everything into the

On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote: > With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls into > account when delivering data - how can I activate > "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" > without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our > future file system won't be able to support acls. Sorry, but this is

Hi Ralph > On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote: >> With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls >> into account when delivering data - how can I activate >> "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" >> without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our >> future file system won't be able to support

Hello, We've been using samba 3.3.9 with vfs_acl_xattr for some time now, and we do have one issue - when someone moves a file from one place to another (in Windows), it keeps the old ACLs instead of inheriting the new ones. I understand why this is happening (moving as opposed to copying, which actually makes a new file, and thus attains new ACLs as well), so I would just like to know if

Sebastian Neustein wrote: > I have to migrate our data from one old samba server to a new one. Due > to various reasons we had to change some settings. Now I struggle to > get the acls right. > ?Previously the acls were stored via posix and extended attributes, > now they are stored only in extended attributes With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls

On 8/21/23 18:20, Sebastian Neustein wrote: > The storage has come a long way with various changes of the smb.conf. It > is possible that at the time of creation of a file/directory > vfs_acl_xattr was not active. This could mean that the directory does > not have any extended attributes written to it and ACLs are only defined > with POSIX ACLs. In this case I would need a

I have been reading through an old thread and to be honest confused.com root at zent1:~# samba-tool domain level show params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/shares.conf" ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=office,DC=zentyal,DC=lan' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003

Greetings, There are 2 imminent releases coming soon to a download server near you: 1. GlusterFS 3.2.6 - a maintenance release that fixes some bugs. 2. GlusterFS 3.3 beta 3 - the next iteration of the exciting new hotness that will be 3.3 You can find both of these in the "QA builds" server: http://bits.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/ There are source tarballs and binary RPMs

>From samba 3.3.0 release notes, it seems like samba 3.3.x is at least experimenting using xattr to store NT ACL, which can eventually provide better NT ACL support. I tried similar features with samba 4.0.0 alpha6, which works very nice. Is there any plan to provide same level of NT ACL support with samba 3.3.x? If there is such plan, any targeted date for that? Thanks, Ying

All, For our project, we bought 8 new Supermicro servers. Each server is a quad-core Intel cpu with 2U chassis supporting 8 x 7200 RPM Sata drives. To start out, we only populated 2 x 2TB enterprise drives in each server and added all 8 peers with their total of 16 drives as bricks to our gluster pool as distributed replicated (2). The replica worked as follows: 1.1 -> 2.1 1.2