similar to: Samba 3.0.37 license confusion

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Hello everyone, I'm not sure who to ask about this, but I have a licensing question. I'm writing a utility to allow Git to connect to SMB shares, which uses libsmbclient. I was thinking about using libgit2 in my program: http://libgit2.github.com/ . This library is licensed as GPLv2 only, with a linking exception to link to any program without restriction. My understanding is that, since

On 19 October 2015 at 18:12, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > One worry is that Apache 2 is incompatible with GPLv2 (is it incompatible with other licenses?) This is interesting, I did not know that... http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible

On 29 October 2015 at 10:25, Jonas Maebe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the previously voiced concerns of incompatibilities between the > Apache and GPLv2 license, I'd like to add one more thing. > > I work on a, at this time mostly LLVM-unrelated [1], "GPLv2 or later" > licensed compiler: the Free Pascal Compiler. Some

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 19 October 2015 at 13:57, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On 19 October 2015 at 18:12, David Chisnall via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> One worry is that Apache 2 is incompatible with GPLv2 (is it

Hi, I'm confused about my licensing obligation with respect to the Xapian SWIG bindings. I've got a python wrapper that sits above the standard Xapian Python/SWIG bindings, and I wasn't sure if the *intent* of the Xapian team is that my python wrapper - and any code that also uses my wrapper also falls under GPLv2. It seems unclear if the FSF's position on dynamic linking in

On 12/03/16 16:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:50:50PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> El 12/03/16 a les 12:37, Rowland penny ha escrit: >> >>> Well yes, but these are usually a mass market product and will no doubt, >>> in the fullness of time, get to use a version of Samba 4 seeing as how >>> 3.6 has been EOL since March 2015.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under the version 3 of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under the version 3 of

Hello, I would like to see Xapian used more widely in the PHP community. The major obstacle is that binaries of the PHP extension cannot be distributed. I've been reading earlier discussions on this and wonder if there's now an option. My starting points were https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/PHP%20Bindings%20Package and the discussion at https://trac.xapian.org/ticket/191. One comment

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc2 June 10, 2008 ================================= This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc2 June 10, 2008 ================================= This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preamble: Please help us testing this release candidate! If there are no major catastrophes, it will become the first major release of Samba 3.2.0. It might take a few hours until the files will be spread to all mirrors. ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preamble: Please help us testing this release candidate! If there are no major catastrophes, it will become the first major release of Samba 3.2.0. It might take a few hours until the files will be spread to all mirrors. ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc1

Hi, I have a licensing question: I'm curious if the fact maketree.py is GPLv2 causes any trouble for the rest of rsync (which is GPLv3 or later). -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html

It should probably not be necessary in my case to compile a custom version of the Cortado applet-the official binary works fine, and may be advantageous over a locally-compiled version (regarding compatibility with 1.1-era JVMs), as was mentioned in a previous message. My interest was to include the corresponding source code when distributing the official binary (i.e. as would be required for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Patience is the companion of wisdom." Saint Augustine ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first stable release of Samba 3.2.0. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Patience is the companion of wisdom." Saint Augustine ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first stable release of Samba 3.2.0. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under

Hi, I want to use library of samba that license is "GPLv2" in my program that is proprietary. The source code version of samba is 3.0.6. Is it possible to modify the license to "LGPL"? Thanks.