similar to: 2.2.14 Panic in sync_expunge_range()

This panic happens with different users, and it also occured in 2.2.13 Panic: file imap-fetch.c: line 556 (imap_fetch_more): assertion failed: (ctx->client->output_cmd_lock == NULL || ctx->client->output_cmd_lock == cmd) hmk GNU gdb 6.8 Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is

We're seeing this: % doveadm force-resync -u USERNAME INBOX doveadm(USERNAME): Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 250 (sync_expunge_range): assertion failed: (count > 0) doveadm(USERNAME): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x817ad) [0x33ab08317ad] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(default_fatal_handler+0x3a) [0x33ab08318ba] ->

Hi! I got this error when build dovecot from source (rev 17627), configure it as imapc proxy (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapcProxy) and run imaptest with clients=2 or more, on latest stable version (2.2.13) and with clients=1 this error does not occurred. Jul 16 17:22:26 imap(user771): Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 250 (sync_expunge_range): assertion failed: (count > 0) Jul

Using build 70, I followed the zfsboot instructions at http:// www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/ to the letter. I tried first with a mirror zfsroot, when I try to boot to zfsboot the screen is flooded with "init(1M) exited on fatal signal 9" Than I tried with a simple zfs pool (not mirrored) and it just reboots right away. If I try to setup grub

Hi, I'm trying to create striped replicated volume but getting tis error: gluster volume create cloud stripe 4 replica 2 transport tcp nebula1:/dataPool nebula2:/dataPool nebula3:/dataPool nebula4:/dataPool wrong brick type: replica, use<HOSTNAME>:<export-dir-abs-path> Usage: volume create<NEW-VOLNAME> [stripe<COUNT>] [replica<COUNT>]

I am getting the following erorr message when trying to do a zfs snapshot: root at pluto#zfs snapshot datapool/mars at backup1 cannot create snapshot ''datapool/mars at backup1'': out of space root at pluto#zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 556G 110G 446G 19% ONLINE - rpool 278G 12.5G 265G 4% ONLINE - Any ideas??? -------------- next part

Following is the output of "zpool iostat -v". My question is regarding the datapool row and the raidz2 row statistics. The datapool row statistic "write bandwidth" is 381 which I assume takes into account all the disks - although it doesn''t look like it''s an average. The raidz2 row static "write bandwidth" is 36, which is where I am confused. What

Hi all, I currently have four drives in my OpenSolaris box. The drives are split into two mirrors, one mirror containing my rpool (disks 1 & 2) and one containing other data (disks 2 & 3). I''m running out of space on my data mirror and am thinking of upgrading it to two 2TB disks. I then considered replacing disk 2 with a 2TB disk and making a RAIDz from the three new drives.

I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users. for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users. and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and grant read only permissions to user2 and user3 how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that? my suggestion would be something like this, but as you can imagine it didn't work: # The general datapool

Ref: http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_bootable_datasets_happily_rumbling Ref: http://mediacast.sun.com/share/timf/zfs-actual-root-install.sh This is my errata for Tim Foster''s zfs root install script: 1/ Correct mode for /tmp should be 1777. 2/ The zfs boot install should allow you to have /usr on a separate zpool: a/ We need to create /zfsroot/usr/lib in the root partition and

woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway. and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755) but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or something like that? Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, "skull"<skull17 at gmx.ch> wrote: >> I want to

libvirt version: 3.4.0 architecture: x86_64 ubuntu16.04-server hypervisor: kvm,qemu when I want make a memery snapshot for a vm ,and I call virsh save ,but tell me this error: error: Failed to save domain 177 to /datapool/mm.img error: operation failed: domain save job: unexpectedly failed xml configure: <domain type='kvm' id='177'> <name>virt23</name>

When would it be necessary to scrub a ZFS filesystem? We have many "rpool", "datapool", and a NAS 7130, would you consider to schedule monthly scrubs at off-peak hours or is it really necessary? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I installed a Solaris 10 development box on a 500G root mirror and later I received some smaller drives. I learned from this list its better to have the root mirror on the smaller small drives and then create another mirror on the original 500G drives so I copied everything that was on the small drives onto the 500G mirror to free up the smaller drives for a new install. After my install

hi all, i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs recovery if disk errors occur. currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup: 2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks) 8 sata disks, same size, same type i have two pools: a) rootpool b) datapool the rootpool is a mirrored pool, where every disk has a slice (the s0, which is 5 % of the whole disk) and this

It might not be a fault in dovecot, as the user is accessing the folder locally with alpine while also running imap-sessions. However it would have been nice with a more graceful action than panic? The panic is preceeded by Error: Next message unexpectedly corrupted in mbox file PATH Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 152 (mbox_sync_read_next_mail): assertion failed:

I'm invoking R in batch mode from a bash script as follows: R --no-restore --no-save --vanilla <$TARGET/$directory/o2sat-$VERSION.R> $TARGET/$directory/o2sat-$VERSION.Routput When R comes across some error in the script however it seems to halt instead of running subsequent lines in the script: Error in file(file, "r") : cannot open the connection Calls: read.table ->

$ zfs list -t filesystem NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 840M 25.5G 21K /datapool datapool/virtualbox 839M 25.5G 839M /virtualbox mypool 8.83G 6.92G 82K /mypool mypool/ROOT 5.48G 6.92G 21K legacy mypool/ROOT/May25-2010-Image-Update

Hi all: It takes more than 10 seconds to create a vm on a Dell R830 machine, but it takes less than 2 seconds on other machines. This is not normal, so I turned on the debug log for libvirtd. I analyzed the log and found that the time was spent on libvirtd calling qemu. Thread 95225 calls the qemuProcessLaunch interface at 14:22:30.129 and then builds the emulator command line, but the

I have a xVm b75 server and use zfs for storage (zfs root mirror and a raid-z2 datapool.) I see everywhere that it is recommended to have a lot of memory on a zfs file server... but I also need to relinquish a lot of my memory to be used by the domUs. What would a good value for dom0_mem on a box with 4 gig of ram?