similar to: Question wrt. dovecot replicator

Maybe you could not delete the message instantly, but keep track of last seen UID. UIDs increase monotonically, so you can rest assured that next arriving email has larger UID. Then you can bulk delete mails that are older than one day. Aki > On October 20, 2017 at 8:01 PM Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Anyone has suggestions? The situation

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:10, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> wrote: > > Does the Dovecot NTLM mechanism work with MS Outlook? > > [ ] YES > [ ] NO > > Please check one ... anybody. > > ?Mark The URL on the wiki, which had probably been shared before with you; http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm suggests it does. The URL quotes: Step 5.

Hi, Anyone has suggestions? The situation also happends when I ?delete? a message from my Phone. It seems to get replicated instantly and the just deleted email is back in the mailbox again. I did remove HA Proxy support in the meantime to rule that out and I have enabled the default replication_max_conns. thanks Remko > On 13 Oct 2017, at 11:56, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org>

Dear Dovecot and community, We run a small email service for our customers, based on two machines that are made ?redundant or clustered? by using the replication feature of Dovecot. This works well, for most emails. Sometimes the following happends: Email to our support database arrives at the inbox. Every period a cronjob looks into that mailbox and parses the information and makes a support

Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: Hi Remko, > Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in > someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the > info@ credentials with the other > people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. That is self-evident and it is not a problem. I can't understand what you

Yeah but if you are uncertain about your own box my VERY STRONG advise is that you reinstall. IF your host is indeed owned, then you are a lot further away then just reinstalling, god knows what issues can arrise when a cracker exploits the system to do bogus tasks.. Then i say: Too bad for your time, sorry but it's like that -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org

forgot this addr. -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Remko Lodder [mailto:remko@elvandar.org] Verzonden: vrijdag 23 januari 2004 10:53 Aan: Nick Twaddell Onderwerp: RE: [Freebsd-security] ipfw + named problem did you tcpdump the packets so that you can

...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015" http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ ============================================================================ samba3 3.0.26a_2,1 <http://www.freshports.org/net/>net<http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount> <http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_all&method=match&query=net/samba3>=220 FORBIDDEN:

Hello Remko: sorry to bother you again,after e mailing freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org mailing list, got a reply by the list moderator rejecting my message,stating that there is no valid message from that address,sugesting yet another email address, it doubts the authenticity of your recomendation Remko, you sugested I should look into securing my emailserver installation by preventing unauthorized

Hello! I use tincd to interconnect 3 LANs: A, B and C. So long, it works fine: everybody reaches everybody. But I want a different behavior: A and B should be allowed to talk, as should B and C. I tried to simply delete the host-files on the nodes that should not be allowed to talk to eachother: A has a hostfile from B B has a hostfile from A and C C has a hostfile from B But this is no

Dear list, I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send email over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin way of sending mail to both master servers. I found out, that on one of the two machines, the email synchronisation is heavily delayed. Lets assume server A receives a mail from the MX; it synchronises almost instantly with the other

Still not quite right for me. Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during state=sync_mails (send=mails recv=recv_last_common) I'm not sure if there is an underlying replication error

I am running Dovecot 2.2.15 on Linux Slackware 14.1 and Samba 4.1.17 as the Active Directory/Domain Controller on the same host as Dovecot. Sendmail/procmail delivers mail to users' $HOME/Maildir. MS Outlook/IMAP is the client MTU used to connect with Dovecot to read mail on the Users' WIN7 workstations. I believe I have confirmed that MS Outlook will either ... 1) send the userid and

We have the same problem, with a twist. When Thunderbird deletes a folder, it is still shown by the GUI. Dovecot deleted the folder correctly, and the sunscriptions file is also correct. Some other times, on shared folders, Thunderbird refuses to delete; in this case, apple mail on iphone can delete successfully. This suggests that the problem is in Thunderbird's code. R On Mon, Feb 5, 2018

On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >> >> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication without those issues reported in this thread? >> #) do you get

Howyd all? Seems that I have been routed. Possibly by a physical B&E, but who knows? Probably some of you do.... anyways, some politically sensitive email was deleted from a user account and the line low -tr & inserted into my .xinitrc . Duncan (Dhu) Campbell

Quoting Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: >> On 11 Jul 2016, at 17:36, Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: >> >> Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: >> >>> You are not alone! >>> >>> On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >>>> Dear list, >>>>

> On 7 Jun 2018, at 07:21, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote: > > Still not quite right for me. > > Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) > Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during

On 29.06.2018 10:53, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: > > Hi Remko, > >> Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in >> someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the >> info@ credentials with the other >> people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. > >

On 29/06/18 09:53, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: > > Hi Remko, > >> Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in >> someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the >> info@ credentials with the other >> people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. > >