similar to: NFS FILE ID not unique when exporting many brtfs subvolumes

Hi, I have setup about a year ago a BTRFS RAID 1 filesystem on two 2TB Western Digital WD20EARS hard drives and I have created subvolumes that I mount regularly as I need them. I put mostly music, videos and various files on them as well as some Git bare repositories for my work files but for the last couple of weeks, there seems to be some activity happening on the drives for a few minutes and

brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM, <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > >>Just a completely different question...is there any plans

Hello, I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a production environment the same functionality as they would have on a Netapp NFS share. The O/S I will be using is CentOS 5 or 6 (max flex on which one) and the hardware is a disk array directly (12 SAS disks 7TB un-configured brand new) attached to a HP 580 G 7. I've done some reading on ZFS on Linux ,fuse-ZFS,

Hello, Looking for a apcupsd 3.14.14 rpm. Been getting communication lost errors. I read there was a problem with the 3.14.12 version regarding a usb connection which I'm using, but has been corrected in 3.14.14. I found a Fedora 25 Rawhide src version, but the link must be bad. Was hoping I could rebuild it for Cento 6. Looks like apcupsd no longer producing the rpms. I could build one

On 18/05/2019 10:22, Hendrik Friedel via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I a bit surprised to get no replies at all... > How come? Lack of information? Lack of clarity? > > Greetings, > Hendrik > No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs and quotas. Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf etc. Why are you using a filesystem that your

On 18/05/2019 14:19, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello > >> No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs >> and quotas. > I would have thought that btrfs is becoming more mainstream now. And > then, Samba and Quotas should be rather common... >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > >> Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf

Hello, just a simple question, my router has CentOS 6 with the apcupsd running, in the log of apcupsd I see this: 2018-02-01 19:05:54 +0100 apcupsd 3.14.12 (29 March 2014) redhat startup succeeded 2018-02-04 15:52:43 +0100 Power failure. 2018-02-04 15:52:49 +0100 Running on UPS batteries. 2018-02-04 15:53:00 +0100 Reached remaining time percentage limit on batteries. 2018-02-04 15:53:00

I have 4 partitions on my hard drive 1 = /boot on ext2 2 = Swap 3 = / on brtfs 4 = /home on btrfs The uuid on partition 3 on my last boot was cloned to partition 4, so when I try to mount either 3 or 4 they both mount the / partition. We tried 7182011 git, and the current version in the ARCH 1062010, and neither had an option for resetting the UUID that we could find.  Both partitions were

Hi, Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. are there any news? Thanks, Arman. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170817/df8afb76/attachment.html>

Yes. It is in the review phase . Actually Sriram implemented zfs snapshot and Mark implemented the brtfs and Mark merged these two patches [1]. Adding them in cc . Reviews are most welcome. [1] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17865/ Regards Rafi KC On 08/17/2017 05:22 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Hi, > Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. > are there any

Hello >No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs and quotas. I would have thought that btrfs is becoming more mainstream now. And then, Samba and Quotas should be rather common... > >Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf etc. Added at the end of this mail. >Why are you using a filesystem that your OS doesn't officially support ? That

Hello List, can anyone tell me how much time is acceptable and assumable for a multi-disk btrfs array with classical hard disk drives to mount? I'm having a bit of trouble with my current systemd setup, because it couldn't mount my btrfs raid anymore after adding the 5th drive. With the 4 drive setup it failed to mount once in a few times. Now it fails everytime because the default

On 12/24/2016 4:33 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > Looking for a apcupsd 3.14.14 rpm. > > Been getting communication lost errors. I read there was a problem with the > 3.14.12 version regarding a usb connection which I'm using, but has been > corrected in 3.14.14. > > I found a Fedora 25 Rawhide src version, but the link must be bad. Was > hoping I could rebuild it for Cento 6.

Hi there, I have an old server (home use now), and i just did a fresh install of 5.8 on it. But the disk is constantly noisy. When running iotop, there is nothing blaring out at me. (sample output) 1722 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.10 % auditd 3 be/7 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.00 % [ksoftirqd/0] 1724 be/2 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.10 % 0.00

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R > Pierce > Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2016 7:44 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] apcupsd-3.14.14 > > On 12/24/2016 4:33 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > > Looking for a apcupsd 3.14.14 rpm. > > > > Been getting communication lost errors. I

I ran into a panic while running find -xdev | xargs brtfs fi defrag ''{}''. I don''t remember the exact command because the history was not saved. I also started and stopped it a few times however. The kernel logs were on a different filesystem. Here is the kern.log:http://fpaste.org/9383/36729191/ My setup is two 2TB hard drives in raid 1. They are both sata drives so

I am using NFS over brtfs (vanilla 3.8.5) for heavy CoW to clone virtual disks with sizes 20-50GB. It worked OK for a couple of days, but yesterday it crashed. Reboot fixed the problem and I do not see any data corruption. I have a couple of different kdumps, I will include one as text and attach the other ones. I am using Fedora 18 with vanilla 3.8.5. The filesystem is created over a SAN volume

I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are there any how to's on how to do that?

On 28.12.2017 16:50, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Matt wrote: >> I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto >> a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are >> there any how to's on how to do that? > > I was under the impression that upstream was deprecating BTRFS. brtfs was only a technology preview in RHEL 7

Hello, >Is btrfs becoming more common ? In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and thus all (?) file systems that support checksums and scrubbing in linux; consequently all filesystems that are the choice of users who need this for ensuring data consistency. >You posted this: > >I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is not