Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[OT] mail address - centos mail list"
2017 Aug 24
3
dmarc report faild ?
Hello Together
Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain
on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems.
Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue?
C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243
Server: dns204.data.ch
Address: 211.232.23.124
Name: wursti.dovecot.fi
Address: 94.237.32.243
2017 Aug 24
3
dmarc report faild ?
In the same vein,
I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org.
Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a
DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report.
It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the
the of a DMARC report) pass...
Here is what I am getting :
This is an authentication failure report for an email
2017 Dec 10
2
hosting emails at home
Hello Mike,
Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a
dynamic one.
Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as
long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup.
Unfortunately, some ISPs are simply blacklisting full range of private
IP addresses just because they are not officials / commercials.
Kind regards,
Andr?
On
2023 Jan 17
1
submission_host auth
> Let's say we have dovecot + sieve plugin container.
> Dovecot configured to use remote SMTP submission host to send messages:
> submission_host = postfix.example.com:587
I reviewed my config to see how i did it. I think you are right and SASL isn't used here. I have dovecot and postfix on the same machine and in dovecot i set
submission_host = localhost:25
Then in my
2019 Feb 11
3
[fdo] PSA: Mailman changes, From addresses no longer accurate
Hi all,
We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques
from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike
in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and
outlook.com in particular.
It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break
DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow
domains to publish policies as to
2019 Feb 11
3
[fdo] PSA: Mailman changes, From addresses no longer accurate
Hi all,
We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques
from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike
in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and
outlook.com in particular.
It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break
DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow
domains to publish policies as to
2020 Jun 11
5
SV: handling spam from gmail.
I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot
is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email
headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu]
Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23
To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users'
Subject: SV: handling spam from
2020 Oct 08
0
Mail server troubles
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 17:50, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is probably a bit OT, but here goes.
>
> I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail
> addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS
> 7
> with Postfix and Dovecot, and it's a nice no-bullshit configuration with
2011 Dec 15
1
DKIM Verification failures
Hi,
-- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot
software --
I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM
Verification failure reports from:
root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report
for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com")
root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job
2017 Dec 10
4
hosting emails at home
I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a virtual
server in the cloud as my mx record and mail relay and have my home record
on dynamic dns. It's really effective.
On Dec 10, 2017 2:37 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com>
wrote:
> On December 10, 2017 2:49:35 PM EST, "Andr? Rodier" <andre at rodier.me>
>
2017 Dec 10
2
hosting emails at home
Which part? Hosting the email server at home or the relay in the cloud?
On Dec 10, 2017 14:53, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com>
wrote:
> On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote:
> >I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a
> >virtual
> >server in the cloud as my mx record
2024 Jul 20
2
openssh-unix-dev DMARC-related settings (was Re: scattered thoughts on connection sharing)
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote:
> The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature.
> In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think
> make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which
> does not; a footer with the list URL is added.
The real issue here is that the Mailman
2012 May 02
1
DKIM Pass - Fail
Hi Dear Community Friends,
it is few days now, i am trying to figure out why DKIM is working / not
working. Any assistance would be very much appreciable.
Server IP is not blacklisted ever, MX, PTR SPF, DKIM records are available
in DNS. why it is working at Gmail, why failing at Yahoo?
Gmail
dkim=pass header.i=@digital-infotech.net
Yahoo:
domainkeys=neutral (no sig);
2020 Oct 26
1
SV: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server
I have no problems with Gmail from Digital Ocean. But I have both spf, DKIM, DMARC and a reverse pointer. You need to not look spammy.
One advantage to using a VPS is your IP is unique. That is you don't share it with a spammer. Not so with hosted services.
? Original Message ?
From: M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu
Sent: October 26, 2020 1:06 AM
To: dovecot at dovecot.org; sebastian at
2018 Oct 01
6
email Server for CentOS 7
> On 29. Sep 2018, at 23:58, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote:
>
> Save yourself the effort, time, headaches and eventual bloody tears of impotent
> rage and just go with Google or some other provider. Running a mail
> server properly is one of the more difficult tasks and quite often not
> worth the time and trouble, especially if one is asking about it on a
2020 Oct 08
6
Mail server troubles
Hi,
This is probably a bit OT, but here goes.
I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail
addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS 7
with Postfix and Dovecot, and it's a nice no-bullshit configuration with SPF,
DKIM and DMARC.
The school sends quite a lot of email out to parents, and sometimes, mail gets
rejected:
2017 Dec 10
5
hosting emails at home
Hello everyone,
I have been using Postfix and Dovecot for my personal emails for years.
After being tired of reinstalling my personal mail server many times, I
am currently writing some Ansible scripts to do it automatically.
I obviously checked the other projects, and did not found anything close
to what I am looking for, so I am implementing it now.
The final goal is to have a box that once
2019 Feb 11
2
[fdo] PSA: Google dropping a lot of list email
Hi all,
There's a good chance that the people who most need to see this won't
see it, but here goes anyway.
Google is currently dropping a _lot_ of the mail we attempt to deliver
to lists.fd.o subscribers. The immediate cause is sending on mail from
domains with SPF/DKIM/DMARC policies which explicitly specify that
lists.fd.o cannot relay mail on their behalf. Every time we do that,
not
2015 Jan 04
4
DMARC test
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Test from Yahoo via Android
> >
> > --Gene
> > _______________________________________________
> > Syslinux mailing list
> > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com
> > Unsubscribe or set options at:
2015 Jan 17
0
DMARC test (request)
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
<snip/>
> > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties
> > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure.
>
> The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject
>
> We shall see how