similar to: Excluding block device from mdadm scan at boot

Just rebuilt a C6 box last week as C7. Four drives, and sda and sdb for root, with RAID-1 and luks encryption. Layout: lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 931.5G 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 200M 0 part /boot/efi ??sda2

Hi Niki, md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? Regards Michael ----- Urspr?ngliche Mail ----- Von: "Niki Kovacs" <info at microlinux.fr> An: "CentOS mailing list" <CentOS at centos.org> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2015 08:09:13 Betreff: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5

I just upgraded my home KVM server to CentOS 6.0 CR to make use of the latest libvirt and now my RAID array with my VM storage is missing. It seems that the upgrade to mdadm-3.2.2 is the culprit. This is the output from mdadm when scanning that array, # mdadm --detail --scan ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=imsm UUID=734f79cf:22200a5a:73be2b52:3388006b ARRAY /dev/md126 metadata=imsm

Hi, I just replaced Slackware64 14.1 running on my office's HP Proliant Microserver with a fresh installation of CentOS 7. The server has 4 x 250 GB disks. Every disk is configured like this : * 200 MB /dev/sdX1 for /boot * 4 GB /dev/sdX2 for swap * 248 GB /dev/sdX3 for / There are supposed to be no spare devices. /boot and swap are all supposed to be assembled in RAID level 1 across

On 05/12/2018 05:37, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:50, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: >> In the rescue mode, recreate the partition table which was on the sdb >> by copying over what is on sda >> >> >> sfdisk ?d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb >> >> This will give the kernel enough to know it has things to do on >> rebuilding parts. >

Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a ?crit : > Hi Niki, > > md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? [root at nestor:~] # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 232,9G 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 3,9G 0 part ? ??md126 9:126 0 3,9G 0 raid1 [SWAP] ??sda2 8:2

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:13:26AM +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > I didn't see any issues with RAID. I think those problems arise only if > you have old RAID devices created with older CentOS releases than 7. Those > were probably created with 0.9 metadata version which may be a problem. > Currently 1.2 metadata version is created and I didn't see any issues with

Hello everyone. I'm trying to install CentOS 8 with root and swap partitions on software raid. The plan is: - create md0 raid level 1 with 2 hard drives: /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, using Linux Rscue CD, - install CentOS 8 with Virtual Box on my laptop, - rsync CentOS 8 root partition on /dev/md0p1, - chroot in CentOS 8 root partition, - configure /etc/mdadm.conf, grub.cfg, initramfs, install

We've recently discovered that libguestfs can't handle guests which use md. There are (at least) 2 reasons for this: Firstly, the appliance doesn't include mdadm. Without this, md devices aren't detected during the boot process. Simply adding mdadm to the appliance package list fixes this. Secondly, md devices referenced in fstab as, e.g. /dev/md0, aren't handled

'--no-degraded' flag in the first mdadm call inhibits the startup of array unless all expected drives are present. This will prevent starting arrays in degraded state. Second mdadm call (after LVM is scanned) will scan unused yet devices and make an attempt to run all found arrays even they are in degraded state. Two new tests are added. This fixes rhbz1527852. Here is boot-benchmark

Hello! On my server PC i have Centos 7 installed. CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810. There are four arrays RAID1 (software RAID) md124 - /boot/efi md125 - /boot md126 - /bd md127 - / I have configured booting from both drives, everything works fine if both drives are connected. But if I disable any drive from which RAID1 is built the system crashes, there is a partial boot and as a result the

Hello all, I have run into a sticky problem with a failed device in an md array, and I asked about it on the linux raid mailing list, but since the problem may not be md-specific, I am hoping to find some insight here. (If you are on the MD list, and are seeing this twice, I humbly apologize.) The summary is that during a reshape of a raid6 on an up to date CentOS 6.3 box, one disk failed, and

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 23:28 +0100, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > > on a Centos5 system installed with software raid I'm getting: > > raid1: raid set md127 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors > > md:.... autorun DONE > > md: Autodetecting RAID arrays > > md: autorun..... > > md : autorun DONE > > trying to resume form /dev/md1 Hi

Adding Paolo and Miroslav. On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Richard Landsman - Rimote <richard at rimote.nl > wrote: > Hello, > > I would really appreciate some help/guidance with this problem. First of > all sorry for the long message. I would file a bug, but do not know if it > is my fault, dm-cache, qemu or (probably) a combination of both. And i can > imagine some of

Hi I have a disk which two of the partitions are part of a RAID1 setup. I'm trying to rename the the second raided partition mdadm -E /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdc4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 1.2 Feature Map : 0x1 Array UUID : 83d7657b:ebfddcb7:36b0fa14:d29a350c Name : oldname:2 Creation Time : Tue Aug 30 15:25:10 2016 Raid Level : raid1 Raid Devices : 2

I'm confused about which UUID to use to identify a software RAID in fstab. lsblk -fs shows: md127p1 ext4 c43af789-82aa-49e9-a8ed-acd52b1cdd58 /y --- md127 ext4 39c20575-4257-4fd7-b5c8-8a15757e9e8e --- sdb1 linux_r hostname:0 af77830e-8cfd-9012-62ce-e57105c3bf6c --- sdb --- sdc1 linux_r hostname:0 af77830e-8cfd-9012-62ce-e57105c3bf6c

Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:50, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > In the rescue mode, recreate the partition table which was on the sdb > by copying over what is on sda > > > sfdisk ?d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb > > This will give the kernel enough to know it has things to do on > rebuilding parts. Once I made sure I retrieved all my data, I followed your suggestion, and it looks

In article <20190225050144.GA5984 at button.barrett.com.au>, Jobst Schmalenbach <jobst at barrett.com.au> wrote: > Hi. > > CENTOS 7.6.1810, fresh install - use this as a base to create/upgrade new/old machines. > > I was trying to setup two disks as a RAID1 array, using these lines > > mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdb1

Hi all, I have an odd interaction on a CentOS 7 file server. The basic setup is a minimal 7.x install. I have 4 internal drives (/dev/sd[a-d]) configured in a RAID5 and mounted locally on /data. This is exported via NFS to ~12 workstations which use the exported file systems for /home. I have an external drive connected via USB (/dev/sde) and mounted on /rsnapshot. I use rsnapshot to back up

I still don't understand how this relates to md125.? I don't see it referenced in mdadm.conf.? It sounds like you see it in the output from lsblk, but only because you manually assembled it.? Do you expect there to be a luks volume there?